[mccookgazette.com] Fair ~ 78°F  
High: 83°F ~ Low: 55°F
Thursday, May 5, 2016

The Casey Anthony verdict

Friday, July 8, 2011

This case has consumed the public interest for the past three years. Casey Anthony was charged with first degree murder in the death of her 2 year old daughter whose skeletal fragments were eventually found in a field, six months after she was reported missing by her mother who waited a full month before reporting her daughter's disappearance to the police.

As I was watching the "talking heads," almost all lawyers, on television before the jury returned its verdict, they were almost unanimous in declaring that Anthony would be found guilty of first degree murder and most concluded she would be given the death penalty. As most of you now know, she was acquitted on all charges of having anything to do with her daughter's death and convicted only on the four charges of providing false information to law enforcement personnel, all misdemeanors. She was sentenced by the judge on Thursday to the maximum one year per charge, to run consecutively, plus a one thousand dollar fine for each charge. Because she's already been in jail for three years plus the accumulation of time off for good behavior, she will be released from jail next week.

I went to Facebook shortly after the verdict was announced and wasn't surprised to see almost unanimous displeasure with the decision with many people saying it is a sad day for the criminal justice system and the judicial system.

Although I agree with their dismay over Anthony going free, I have to take exception that justice wasn't served. Our system of justice and our judicial system have been in place since the founding of this country. We're assured by the Constitution of the United States of a fair and impartial trial, held in open court, by a jury of our fellow citizens. In a felony trial, a unanimous verdict by all twelve jurors is required to either convict or acquit. If even one disagrees with the sentiments of the others, no judgment can be rendered and it would be up to the prosecution to re-file the charges. If a unanimous verdict of not guilty is delivered, the defendant can never again be charged for that particular crime in the same jurisdiction under another Constitutional provision that prohibits double jeopardy. In other words, the prosecution cannot appeal a not guilty verdict, nor can it re-file the charges.

As was mentioned on television, it's hard if not impossible to get 12 people to agree on what they want for lunch but in a felony trial, that's the rule and it has always been the rule. Law enforcement did their job, the prosecution did their job and the defense team did theirs as well. The instructions given by the judge to the jury includes the admonition that the defendant's guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt for the jury to render a guilty verdict. Obviously, that did not happen. The case was entirely circumstantial with no direct evidence or testimony at all that linked Anthony to her daughter's death and that simply wasn't enough to convince the jurors of her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

In fact, one juror said that the entire jury was "sick to their stomach" over the verdict but they had no other option other than the one they chose. The same juror also said their verdict didn't mean they thought Anthony was innocent of the charge but they had to find her not guilty because the prosecution didn't prove its case.

In a felony trial, it doesn't matter what a person or a group of people "think" happened. It must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt and if it isn't, they are required by the judge's instructions to render a verdict of not guilty and that's what happened.

So the question is, did Casey Anthony get away with murder? I think maybe she did but the prosecution failed to prove that to the satisfaction of the jury and that's all that counts. It's always interesting to me when a jury rules what we think is the wrong way how outraged so many of us become until we're faced with a similar situation and then we want the same constitutional protections afforded us that we think should have been denied to someone else.

The jury saw all the evidence, heard all the testimony, thoroughly discussed the merits and demerits of the case over a two-day period in the jury room and reached a unanimous verdict.

That's the way our judicial system is supposed to work and because it did, justice was served even if we individually disagree with the verdict.


Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on mccookgazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Logic dictates that when being widely and soundly criticized for one's opinion, one should change the subject to something safe, some outrage that is widely agreed upon.

It is admirable that you didn't go with the "her father was a cop, so of course his fellow officers covered up the crime for her, as all good cops should do" stratagem that I know must have tempted you . . .

-- Posted by Spock on Fri, Jul 8, 2011, at 2:33 PM

Our criminal justice system is NOT perfect. However if a mistake is made it is better to let a guilty defendant off than it is to convict an innocent person. I just hope Casey Anthony NEVER has another child.

-- Posted by Big Chief on Sat, Jul 9, 2011, at 12:27 PM

no big deal if she does. if it gets burdensome, she can just throw it away rather than giving it to someone who could, and want to, nuture it.

-- Posted by doodle bug on Mon, Jul 11, 2011, at 3:26 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

Mike Hendricks
Mike at Night