[mccookgazette.com] Partly Cloudy ~ 35°F  
High: 63°F ~ Low: 42°F
Monday, May 2, 2016

The big potential of small scale hydropower

Friday, July 8, 2011

Hydropower is often thought to require massive dams and complex infrastructures to process millions of gallons of water to power entire cities. Small streams and irrigation canals are rarely considered resources to generate hydropower. In reality, the future of hydropower lies in these nontraditional sources.

Hydropower, the original green energy, remains the largest source of non-carbon emitting energy in the world. It provides low-cost electricity, reduces harmful carbon emissions, and accounts for 67 percent of America's total renewable electricity generation.

Dams and reservoirs have provided affordable and reliable energy for generations of Nebraskans. The ability to harness the power of moving water has paid tremendous dividends for Nebraska's economy. While it is vital to continue making the most of our existing hydropower infrastructure, promoting new efforts designed to produce hydropower from smaller sources is important.

The thousands of miles of irrigation canals, pipes, and ditches across the Third District create tremendous opportunity for new hydropower generation. Many irrigators want to use small projects to reduce electricity costs and generate much-needed revenue to repair aging infrastructure. Furthermore, increased revenues from the sale of this renewable energy could result in lower irrigation costs to farmers. Finally, irrigation water delivery would continue while utilizing flows for clean, emissions-free energy production.

In February, I reintroduced the bipartisan Small Scale Hydropower Enhancement Act (H.R. 795) to encourage the next generation of hydropower innovation. Recently, H.R. 795 had its first hearing in the House Committee on Natural Resources Water and Power Subcommittee.

Unfortunately, small scale hydropower faces unnecessary, overbearing regulations from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). FERC's current requirements, most of which are unnecessary or outdated, stifle innovation in the small scale hydropower field by making projects financially prohibitive.

One-size-fits-all rules limit opportunity for small projects to expand our sources of clean, renewable energy while also hindering entrepreneurship and economic development across the nation. H.R. 795 explicitly exempts conduit hydropower projects generating less than one and a half megawatts, which is enough power to supply energy for more than 1,000 homes, from FERC's permitting rules. Such hydropower produced in man-made water delivery systems does not consume or disrupt water deliveries and has no environmental effect on temperature or aquatic life. This commonsense approach would eliminate bureaucratic hurdles faced by small scale ventures to allow them to contribute to our nation's energy portfolio.

Hydropower, on both large and small scales, can and should play a critical role in our nation's clean, affordable, and reliable energy future. The Small Scale Hydropower Act, which is endorsed by the National Hydropower Association, Family Farm Alliance, and the National Water Resources Association, would help stimulate the economy of rural America, empower local irrigation districts to generate revenue and increase domestic energy production - all at no cost to taxpayers.

For more information about energy issues, the latest developments in Congress, or to sign up for my e-mail newsletter, please visit my website at www.adriansmith.house.gov.

Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on mccookgazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Here is an initiative I can fully support. I've long been of the opinion that the best adjective one could apply to technology of any sort was appropriate. Appropriate in type, scale and application. This makes use of a primary power source going to waste anyway and may be applied on small scales in localities otherwise not served by alternate technologies.Seems a worthwhile addition to a mix of alternate production means.Solar, Wind and this could mean dependable power at dependable rates generated near the point of use.I hope Representative Smith continues to pursue this initiative.

-- Posted by davis_x_machina on Mon, Jul 11, 2011, at 8:47 AM

What if a series of "canal" systems were to be built across nebraska connecting the river systems to one another, as to allow water to be diverted from one area of the state to another in times of need...and install small scale hydro-power locations throughout the infrastructure and provide energy whilst saving millions in property damage...just thinking.

-- Posted by cplcac on Mon, Jul 11, 2011, at 10:39 PM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

U.S. Rep. Adrian Smith
Washington Report