[mccookgazette.com] Fair ~ 49°F  
High: 70°F ~ Low: 35°F
Tuesday, Apr. 28, 2015

Moving forward

Monday, April 25, 2011

With the government funded for the rest of the fiscal year, Congress can focus on solving the other problems which daily impact Nebraska families, workers and businesses. While progress has been made in many areas, there is much work left to do. The price of gas continues to rise; onerous regulations hamper businesses; and government spending needs additional cuts. Moving forward, with the distraction of passing stopgap funding measures removed, our responsibility to the American people is to keep working together to tackle the big problems we face today or face bigger problems tomorrow.

Cutting More Government Spending

On April 18, Standard & Poor's (S&P), a financial services company which issues credit ratings for the debt of public entities, downgraded the long-term credit outlook for the United States from "stable" to "negative." S&P stated the reason for its new evaluation is the "very large budget deficits and rising government indebtedness." This rating is the most serious alarm bell sounded about the spending-driven debt crisis we face.

While important steps have been taken on the long road to get our fiscal house in order, including the largest year-to-year spending cut since World War II, we must continue doing all we can to put our economy on a path to prosperity. This path includes the honest conversation about how we cut trillions in government spending instead of billions.

Fixing Our Broken Energy Policy

The average price of gas is now 98 cents higher per gallon than this time a year ago. Rising energy costs cause substantial hardship for families, seniors, schools, and small businesses. The time to act on comprehensive energy policy is now, before prices at the pump soar to $4 a gallon or more. American energy policy is broken. For too long, it has focused on limiting energy production within our borders and making it more expensive.

Congress and the Administration must work together to develop energy policy which uses the abundant resources our country possesses. Sources like coal, natural gas, hydropower, nuclear, wind, and solar fill America's diverse, plentiful energy portfolio. A strategic, all-of-the-above approach to energy policy, which utilizes American engineering, ingenuity and entrepreneurship, will strengthen our economy and create thousands of new jobs, right here at home. More importantly, by encouraging conservation, incentivizing innovation, and responsibly using existing American resources, cost burdens on Nebraskans will be lessened.

Eliminating Burdensome Regulations

Job-crushing regulations, which prevent businesses from hiring employees, expanding product lines, or investing in new technologies, remain at an unprecedented high. For too long, Congress has failed to implement legislative oversight and allowed agencies to ignore its Constitutional authority.

We must stop unelected bureaucrats from enacting overly burdensome regulations on the American people, which is why 170 of my colleagues and I recently sent a bipartisan letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers to express deep concerns about these agencies' attempts to push through a dramatic expansion of the Clean Water Act. By the agencies' own admission, the "Clean Water Protection Guidance" released in December 2010 will substantively change federal policy with respect to which waters fall under the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and significantly increase the scope of the federal government's power to regulate waters. The EPA, the Corps, and other federal agencies, must be held accountable for clear overreaches and restrained in this era of out-of-control government.

For more information about these issues, the latest developments from Congress, or to sign up for my e-mail newsletter, please visit my website at www.adriansmith.house.gov.


Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on mccookgazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Dear Representative Smith:

Respectfully, sir, your statement here that the administration is pushing "a dramatic expansion of the Clean Water Act" is mistaken. These agencies are simply doing their job in explaining what water bodies are covered by the Act, and nothing they say can expand the law as it has been written by Congress and interpreted by the Supreme Court.

Beyond that, I would expect that the American people would support the full enforcement of the Clean Water Act, which has been instrumental to the remarkable improvement in our nation's water quality since its passage in 1972. I hope you can agree.

I'm also curious whether you know that 525,566 Nebraskans get at least some of their drinking water from suppliers that rely on headwater and other critical streams, and that -- under the status quo that your letter seeks to maintain -- it is now more difficult than it had been historically to protect many of those streams under the pollution control programs of the Clean Water Act.

I don't think it's "out-of-control government" when public officials try to protect the water we use from pollution. I think it's good government.

Sincerely,

Jon Devine

-- Posted by jdevine on Tue, Apr 26, 2011, at 3:11 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

U.S. Rep. Adrian Smith
Washington Report