[mccookgazette.com] Mostly Cloudy and Breezy ~ 55°F  
Flash Flood Warning
Thursday, May 26, 2016

Federal government must not bully communities on immigration

Monday, July 19, 2010

A battle is brewing between the federal government and our communities over illegal immigration, and the field of play is far from fair. Because the federal government has failed to secure our borders, state and local governments are acting in good faith to protect our communities by passing local immigration laws. The federal government is now challenging Arizona's immigration law in court. Such lawsuits are unfair to state and local governments because the federal government has virtually limitless resources.

Litigation comes with a huge financial burden for cities and states. As a former City Council member, County Commissioner, Mayor and Governor, I know the chilling effect this can have on local decisions. Having served in the President's Cabinet, I also know that if the federal government flexes its muscle or sues communities--or even threatens to sue--it can be daunting. Even if the Justice Department doesn't think it can win a suit, it can simply overwhelm local governments with lawyers and litigation.

That's why I introduced a bill that levels the playing field by requiring the federal government to cover the cost if it sues and the local immigration law is upheld. It sends a message to the Justice Department that if they want to take these communities to court, they must make sure their reasons are pure and based in law.

The federal government should be a friend to the states, cities, and citizens of our country, not an adversary. In suing these communities, the federal government is trying to send a warning to prevent other communities from taking action on illegal immigration.

The Administration is claiming federal preemption--that the federal government has sole jurisdiction over immigration law. Yet, even the Administration's own policies agree that the the feds should give careful consideration when deciding whether to use federal preemption. A May 2009 memo penned by the President says, "Preemption of State law by executive departments and agencies should be taken only with full consideration of legitimate prerogatives of the States and with a sufficient legal basis for preemption... Executive departments and agencies should be mindful that in our Federal system, the citizens of the several States have distinctive circumstances and values, and that in many instances it is appropriate for them to apply to themselves rules and principles that reflect these circumstances and values."

Despite this extremely high threshold, the Administration is suing Arizona because of its immigration law, and I'm worried the courtroom will be used as a national stage to scare others from considering similar laws. Rather than wasting its time suing our communities, the federal government should instead see the passage of local immigration laws as a wakeup call signaling that more robust border security and enforcement are needed at the national level. Until that time, my bill would ensure our state and local governments have a level playing field when facing-off against the vast resources of the federal government.

Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on mccookgazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

I wonder what part of the word """Responsible""" the Federal Government doesn't understand?? Responsibility does not contain the right to not do what one is responsible to do.

I suppose there is a place in the Constitution, that I have not seen, that allows the Federal Administration to Preempt a State Law, that allows the State to do the job that the Federal Administration is responsible for, but I cannot find it in Constitution, nor Amendments. Help, please, if anyone knows where it is.

I was taught, fifty five years ago, the People are the Owners of the State Governments, and the State Governments share, what responsibilities they share, with the Federal Government, with all Laws to be as required by the Constituency, up, not the leadership, down, especially when the Law tries to subjugate the People.

If I err, where do I err??

It appears that We The People are becoming Subjects of Them the Owners of the People, and our Congress is doing nothing they were 'hired' to do. I, for one, tire of seeing the freedoms of this country being flushed down the toilet of Socialism. Enough said. Pray for Israel, and now, also, USA. We both need God's protection; one from without, and we from within.

Senator Mike, Your Bill does not stand a chance of being seen, on any floor, but should it pass, it is We the People, who will pay the bill, no matter which option consummates. You work hard, as I understand; please work wisely, also.

-- Posted by Navyblue on Mon, Jul 19, 2010, at 7:52 PM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

Sen. Mike Johanns
Sen. Mike Johanns
U.S. Sen. Mike Johanns is a former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Nebraska governor and Lincoln mayor.

Address: 404 Russell, Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510

Phone: (202) 224-4224
Fax: (202) 228-0436

You may contact Senator Johanns by emailing mike_johanns@johanns.senate.gov. If you would like to receive a response from Senator Johanns, please ensure you include your name, full address, and phone number.