[mccookgazette.com] A Few Clouds ~ 47°F  
High: 70°F ~ Low: 42°F
Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Dogs that attacked had history of viciousness

Thursday, May 20, 2010

McCOOK, Nebraska -- One dog has been destroyed and another is likely to be after they attacked an elderly McCook man out for a walk earlier this month.

According to public records, the McCook Police Department responded to the man's cell phone call at 5:36 p.m. on May 8, while he was being attacked by the two dogs while going for a walk near the 1500 block of West 10th.

The man, who was treated at Community Hospital and released, declined to be interviewed for this story.

"He was walking down the sidewalk and did nothing to provoke the animals, which were running loose" said McCook Police Chief Isaac Brown. "His wounds were serious but not life-threatening" Brown added.

Both dogs were taken into custody and it was discovered that one of them had been ordered destroyed in Red Willow County Court on March 31, a sentence handed down from a citation issued on March 24.

The owner had been given 10 days to provide proof to city offices that the animal had been destroyed, according to court documents, which places the attack on the eighth day after the order.

The primary aggressor in the attack, which also was the dog that had been ordered destroyed, was received at the Humane Society and was quickly determined to be vicious to the point that it could not be cared for and was taken to a veterinarian to be destroyed.

The second dog is being held as evidence; however Chief Brown said he expected the court to order it to be destroyed as well.

"We have had a number of calls for vicious dogs for biting or attempting to bite -- it seems to be an increasing trend" said Chief Brown.

When asked if there was a trend regarding the breed, Chief Brown commented that "the vast majority, particularly within the last year are pitbulls or a pitbull mix of some kind."

The dog owner originally was found guilty of two counts of dog at large, a $40 fine, in January of 2004, then cited and found guilty again for two counts of dog at large, a $40 fine, in February 2006, and also found guilty for a single count of dog at large, a $20 fine, in August 2008.

These cases came prior to the March 24, 2010, finding of guilty for vicious dog, a $20 fine, and dog running at large, a $20 fine, which saw the court order the dog to be destroyed and proof provided to the city within 10 days.

He was also cited for no rabies tag and animals running at large but those charges were dismissed.

"We will be looking at immediate surrender of vicious dogs as a possibility for future cases" City Attorney Nate Schneider said in a phone interview regarding the incident.


Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on mccookgazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Just wanted to make the comment that ANY breed can become a problem if not contained. It comes down to being a RESPONSIBLE pet owner. You would not turn your 2 year old outside alone so why would you put your pet out alone? All dogs should be on a leash or contained when not in the owners control. My grandaughter was viciously attacked by a sweet border collie because he was old and sleeping and she came along and simply scared him. Just goes to show you never know. All dogs should be contained when alone for everyones safety including theirs. Great article by the way.

-- Posted by catlemm on Thu, May 20, 2010, at 3:11 PM

If the order was issued on March 31st and the owner had 10 days to show proof the dog had been put down, wouldn't that make the deadline April 10th not May 10th? What happens when someone doesn't comply with a court order?

-- Posted by heymicahs mom on Thu, May 20, 2010, at 7:15 PM

In McCook heymicahs mom, nothing.

-- Posted by Chunky Peanut Butter on Thu, May 20, 2010, at 9:28 PM

Well if the man who was attacked decides to sue in civil court it could cost him a lot.

-- Posted by Chaco1 on Fri, May 21, 2010, at 9:01 AM

who is the dog owner?

-- Posted by dennis on Sun, May 23, 2010, at 9:50 AM

While true that any dog can and will bite under the right circumstances, there are certain breeds nd crosses that have a statistically higher number of attacks. Pits are bred for an aggressiveness and tenacity that makes them very dangerous for a non professional to handle. I have trained dogs for over 40 years and regretfully have to say that pits need to go. This is not their fault. People breed and own them for these traits because they want to own a "bad ass" dog. Unfortunately we can't have the irresponsible breeders and owners put to sleep so once again it is the dogs who will pay for human stupidity

-- Posted by Rikkadog on Wed, Jun 2, 2010, at 4:30 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

Related subjects