[mccookgazette.com] Overcast ~ 74°F  
High: 77°F ~ Low: 58°F
Tuesday, Aug. 30, 2016

Using budget reconciliation for health care unwise

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Dear Nebraskans,

With the health care debate back in the spotlight, Americans continue to call for a new approach to health care reform. The original Senate bill was very partisan and costly, and required multiple special deals just to garner support from all Democrats. The bill is so ill-conceived that the House of Representatives to date has refused to even consider it. As this bill lingers on life support, Republicans stand waiting with ideas to confront the problems of cost and access on a step-by-step basis. Instead, it looks as if bipartisanship will be passed over in favor of a process called reconciliation to circumvent Senate rules and railroad through this deeply flawed, partisan bill.

Reconciliation does two things: it drastically limits debate and it allows legislation to pass with only a simple majority vote. Sixty votes are required for a reason: this threshold requires and indeed encourages greater cooperation and agreement. It fosters bipartisanship. President Obama agreed as recently as 2005, when as a Senator he stated that removing the 60-vote threshold would "change the character of the Senate forever" and that having "majoritarian, absolute power on either side" was "not what the Founders intended." Weeks later, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid also proclaimed, "The right to extend a debate is never more important than when one party controls both Congress and the White House. The filibuster serves as a check on power and preserves our limited government."

Reconciliation has never been used to pass a bill of this magnitude and on a strictly partisan basis. When it was utilized for tax cuts, 12 Senate Democrats supported it; when used for welfare reform, half of all Democrats approved. Using reconciliation to pass health care reform, which would overhaul one-sixth of our economy, has been rejected by all Republicans and a majority of the American people. It is an intolerable parliamentary trick to jam an ill-advised bill through Congress.

Some have been quick to blame the 41 Republicans for being obstructionist. Let us not forget that the Senate has historically operated smoothly when neither party had anywhere close to a 60-vote supermajority. How? By crafting sensible and thoughtful bills that enjoyed bipartisan support. That is how the Senate has always worked. Yet with such a strong majority, Democrat leadership decided to abandon bipartisanship entirely. They produced a health care bill that Republicans and most Americans view as terribly flawed. Now they want to double down on their one-sided bill, ignore compromise, and pass it with a simple majority using a method never intended to be used for such far-reaching legislation.

President Obama was right: the Founding Fathers were frightened of what they called "tyranny of the majority," and created the Senate so that cooperative agreements would be reached. It is my hope that Democrats will resist the temptation to use this parliamentary maneuver and instead return to the drawing board so we can give the American people a bipartisan bill they want and deserve.

Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on mccookgazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Obama will do or say anything to get elected or pass legislation so anything he's said in the past has no bearing.

-- Posted by hankherndon on Tue, Mar 2, 2010, at 2:04 PM

Many recent (last 20 years) reconciliation efforts by the republicans passed based on barely 50+ votes.. Why is it bad now?

-- Posted by mickhaney on Wed, Mar 3, 2010, at 12:17 AM

Reconciliation has been used for budget items and not for legislation especially legislation opposed by such a large majority of Americans.

The dems have 59 votes, if this is so good for the US they can't even convince Snowe, McCain or Collins to go along?

Do a little research and see what Robert Byrd said about the rule he wrote and the last time they tried to get healthcare through. They tried reconciliation on that one too.

-- Posted by Chaco1 on Wed, Mar 3, 2010, at 8:57 AM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

Sen. Mike Johanns
Sen. Mike Johanns
U.S. Sen. Mike Johanns is a former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Nebraska governor and Lincoln mayor.

Address: 404 Russell, Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510

Phone: (202) 224-4224
Fax: (202) 228-0436

You may contact Senator Johanns by emailing mike_johanns@johanns.senate.gov. If you would like to receive a response from Senator Johanns, please ensure you include your name, full address, and phone number.