[mccookgazette.com] A Few Clouds ~ 62°F  
High: 70°F ~ Low: 45°F
Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Broken promises not the way to fix health care

Monday, October 5, 2009

Dear Nebraskans,

Throughout his presidential campaign, President Obama routinely promised that no one earning less than $250,000 would see their taxes increased. In fact, he promised not to raise taxes for those individuals by "one single dime." Yet if the health care proposal currently being debated in the Senate Finance Committee were to become law, this promise would be shattered. I was very disappointed last week when a proposal requiring the fulfillment of this promise was voted down in the committee.

The Finance Committee's proposal contains an "individual mandate," which requires almost all Americans to have insurance. A report issued last week by the Joint Committee on Taxation and the Congressional Budget Office outlined the extent of the burden this would impose on the middle class. The report projects the federal government will raise about $2.8 billion via individual mandate penalties. The Finance Committee is depending upon the revenue from this tax to pay for health care reform. An astounding 71 percent of the money reaped from this tax--$2 billion--would be taken from those families earning $120,000 or less per year, or individuals earning $59,000. These are the very people President Obama swore to protect. This is a back-door tax increase, and a disingenuous way of dropping the hammer on the American people.

The most distressing part of this middle class tax increase is that the Finance Committee was given a chance to eliminate it. My Republican colleague and Finance Committee member, Senator Mike Crapo of Idaho, offered an amendment last week that would have required the legislation to abide by President Obama's promise. The language literally would have prevented the legislation from imposing any sort of tax on those who earn less than $250,000. Twelve Democrats voted against keeping the President's word, and essentially in favor of taxing the middle class. Only one Democrat voted with Republicans on this amendment, and unfortunately it failed 12 to 11.

In addition, the current legislation already passes costs onto state budgets by significantly expanding Medicaid coverage, which forces states to foot part of the bill. This would require states to either increase taxes or cut important programs.

The rhetoric of the health care reform debate is not matching the reality. Congress must put its "money where its mouth is" and keep the promises made to the American people. If this legislation passes, the middle class will find itself taxed on all sides. We'll face: a new health insurance system that passes new costs down onto states; an individual mandate that penalizes taxpayers directly; and a new 40 percent tax on many insurance plans, which is sure to be passed onto consumers through higher insurance rates. There simply has to be a better way than broken promises to reform our health care system.


Mike Johanns

Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on mccookgazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Give us an alternative? Bitch about progress.. Spout the tax increase? The American people elected Obama.. Thanks to backward states like Nebrska, who do not live in a Global society, and only have to worry about the latest farm bill, can this lack of progressive retoric be acceptable...

-- Posted by mickhaney on Tue, Oct 6, 2009, at 1:29 AM

While I understand that simply complaining about everything is not very productive, I've never understood the ideology of "since you can't do better, you can't complain." I know that there are a lot of people who can't write computer programs; does that mean that they shouldn't complain about problems within the program?

Pointing out problems or issues in the hopes that they will be acknowledged and worked on makes up a significant portion of troubleshooting. Complaining to improve something is not the same as complaining to complain, despite political bias.

Besides, mick, isn't it a bit hypocritical for you to complain about people complaining without providing an alternative? Your post does nothing to provide an alternative for Senator Johanns instead of complaining; you just badmouth his complaints and insult Nebraskans. Perhaps you are the one who should work on giving constructive criticism, instead of berating others for not doing the same.

-- Posted by bjo on Tue, Oct 6, 2009, at 10:49 AM

My alternative is to have government run health insurance like every other civilized country on this planet..

-- Posted by mickhaney on Wed, Oct 7, 2009, at 5:53 AM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

Sen. Mike Johanns
Sen. Mike Johanns
U.S. Sen. Mike Johanns is a former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Nebraska governor and Lincoln mayor.

Address: 404 Russell, Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510

Phone: (202) 224-4224
Fax: (202) 228-0436

You may contact Senator Johanns by emailing mike_johanns@johanns.senate.gov. If you would like to receive a response from Senator Johanns, please ensure you include your name, full address, and phone number.