Board member receives threatening letter on vote

Friday, November 21, 2008

Police are investigating a threatening letter sent to a McCook School Board member.

Shane Messersmith of the McCook Board of Education said he got the unsigned letter Nov. 14, that was mailed from a location in McCook. It has been turned over to the McCook Police Department.

Although not getting into specifics because of the ongoing investigation, Messersmith did reveal the general content.

Messersmith issued a written statement: "Basically the letter said there would be consequences if I didn't change my vote so that Gary Power was not sworn in at the next board meeting.

"I couldn't figure out what the letter was referring to since the board had already selected Gary to fill the vacancy at our Monday meeting. As far as I was concerned, the vote was final and everything was moving forward.

"It became clear to me late that afternoon when Larry Shields, school board president, called me about an upcoming special school board meeting. Tom Bredvick, another school board member, had just called Larry that afternoon and requested a special meeting on Monday, with the only agenda item to rescind the vote on Gary Power's appointment to the board.

"I put two and two together and realized that whoever had sent me the threatening letter knew about the upcoming meeting before I did, and the fact that I would have a chance to change my vote on Gary.

"It is unfortunate that someone has tried to subvert the democratic process that our forefathers set into place.

"During my campaign for school board two years ago, one of my goals was to set into place a system of checks and balances in the school. I feel this system has been implemented and it's working. Obviously this has bothered some people who are now trying to change the outcome of the school board vote.

"Where is this going to end? It's already consumed one board member. I refuse to be intimated by unsigned hate mail.

"We have three children in our school systems and I want to help ensure that they get the best education possible. No amount of threats will influence me from that objection."

McCook Police Chief Ike Brown declined to comment on the specifics of the investigation but said threatening communication of any kind is a violation of law, which could subject the individual person to criminal prosecution.

"It's always inappropriate and usually ends up counter-productive," he said.

At the regular meeting Nov. 10, McCook School Board members selected Gary Power by 3-2, as the replacement to complete the two years remaining in president Greg Larson's term, who resigned in September without explanation.

The voting process board members used had each member rank the seven candidates to narrow the selection down to the top two, who would then be voted on. Scott Johnson ranked as the highest candidate among the initial ranking and a tie-breaker for the second candidate was won by Gary Power by 3-2.

At the final voting, Power was chosen to fill the position with Messersmith, Diane Lyons and Larry Shields voting in favor and Tom Bredvick and Mike Gonzales voting against it.

Superintendant Dave Schley said in a previous Gazette article that two board members decided to revisit the issue due to discontent after the Nov. 10 meeting.

A special board meeting Monday will be at 6 p.m. at the junior high conference room, when board members will be asked to rescind their vote. The meeting is open to the public.

Comments
View 28 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Boy, some of the public have condemned Shane because they think he deciced his vote "prior" to the meeting, however this looks like it is another board member who has been speaking out of turn since Shane got the letter before he even knew there was even going to be a meeting, what is up with that?

    I also can not believe that someone has gone to the extreme of sending threats to him to get him to change his vote. Come on, you may not agree with the man but do you really need to threaten him? Kudo's to him for standing up and going to the Police with this letter. One has to wonder if this is the same person/people who were also said to be threatening Greg Larson. My advise to all of you is to go to the school board meeting and develop your own opinion and then go from there. Speak up there if you want to. You do not have to remain silent no matter what side you are on, but resulting to threats is not the right thing to do, and it is a crime. I think we all can agree with that can't we?

    I hope that our School Board members are able to vote on this and other issues with the best in mind for my/your children and that threats do not change votes...........

    -- Posted by McCook Gal on Fri, Nov 21, 2008, at 1:27 PM
  • I'm with you on this issue McCook Gal. Wake up McCook...I think this kind of behavior is uncalled for...threating a board member to get things done YOUR WAY!!! I really think this community needs to take a look at this...maybe you have all jumped the gun on Shane, Larry & Diane. Shame on whom ever thinks that they can threated a board member to change his vote. I really hope that person is prosecuted to the full extent!!! I'm sure if it was anyone within the current board or our current administration they have tried to cover their tracks. I guess I wonder how people live with themselves when they act in such a manner. Mr. Messersmith has been a board member that you can easily talk to and I feel he has our children and the patron's best interest at heart. I think those of you that are getting all worked up over a recall should ask these board members why they voted the way they did...you might be surprised that they did not plan this ahead of time and they don't have a secret agenda. That is more than I can say for whom ever sent the letter to Mr. Messersmith. Good for you Shane for bringing this information forward...it is about time that someone stands up to these people!!!

    I think this community did not understand the process in which Mr. Powers was selected...it was not an automatic that whom ever had the top votes should be voted on. That was not the intention of the tally sheets...it was to narrow it down to 2. In my observation, that means that the slate and scores were cleared and the board would then vote on the top two candidates. I don't think the scores from before should have anything to do with the outcome of how was selected. But here again the reporter from the gazette did not make that point clear. Very bias with your headlines and remarks. But, I guess we should all be use to that by now...not much has changed since the days of Reading First!!!

    -- Posted by Another Concerned Parent on Fri, Nov 21, 2008, at 1:56 PM
  • You could be right on the covering of the tracks. I understand that the buisiness manager is already lobbying for the Superintendant position. Can't think of a better way to get the job than to scare off all other applicants.

    -- Posted by Hugefan on Fri, Nov 21, 2008, at 4:26 PM
  • Sounds like this scenario is right out of the TV Guide. Someone has to be a jerk and threaten someone because of what they think. Reminds me of the game "Clue". Someone close to the situation is causing trouble.

    I wonder if the tides would turn if the shoe was on the other foot and the anonymous person was threatened???

    -- Posted by edbru on Fri, Nov 21, 2008, at 5:41 PM
  • I agree that sending a threatening letter is completely uncalled for, although I still commend the Gazette for posting the results of the election -- Scott Johnson was clearly ahead on the initial round of voting, so why not the second??? So, no, I don't believe anyone that has been following these developments, whether it's thanks to the Gazette or not, have jumped the gun... Except for the person who sent that threatening letter.

    -- Posted by What I think... on Fri, Nov 21, 2008, at 5:53 PM
  • Larry remember keep your friends close and your enemies closer. In other words don't turn your back on Shane or you could be the next one he tries to get rid of so he can be president. Shane did you use the right postage when you sent the letter.

    -- Posted by ddt4mccook on Fri, Nov 21, 2008, at 10:07 PM
  • ddt4mccook....I can't believe the comment you just posted....I guess you are blinded by our current administration and a select few board members, or maybe you are one of them...I hope you are at the meeting on Monday...you have obviously been lead in the wrong direction. I find if very sick that you would make comments about a threating letter coming from this board member himself. I guess you don't have a wife and kid's. This is not a joking matter...just people that haven't got their way so they have to use threats to manipulate the situation.This person should be ashamed of their actions!!!

    -- Posted by Another Concerned Parent on Fri, Nov 21, 2008, at 11:12 PM
  • Another Concerned Parent....You're right this is not a joking matter nor did I say that it was. What I did was gave a little heads up to someone I know about watching his back. Futhermore if you don't think Shane was behind the stepping down of Mr. Larson then you are the one who has been led in the wrong direction. Oh and yes I do have a wife and kids, no I am not one of the admin. or board members, and I think I will be at the meeting Monday night. One more thing if I am right about who sent the letter I will accept your apoligize on this site as I hope you will accept mine if I am wrong(and I hope for the sake of our kids I am).

    -- Posted by ddt4mccook on Sat, Nov 22, 2008, at 12:03 AM
  • I for one will be at the board meeting on Monday and certainly hope that we have several hundred people in attendance. ddt 4 you are exactly right about giving a heads up to other board members to be watching their backs with these three.

    I also have/had children in this school system and am a concerned parent. Sad that they are playing with our kid's education in this manner and setting such bad examples of public service. Any of you reading this that do not think that Lyons, Messersmith and Shields were not involved with what lead up to Larson's resignation then you need to remove your blinders and take a look at what is really going on.

    As for the threatening letter it is not a joking matter and it will be interesting to see what the police find in their investigation and if they will make the results of their investigation public. Self motivation, does that also warrant criminal prosecution?

    -- Posted by emidge on Sat, Nov 22, 2008, at 8:39 AM
  • I in no way support anyone sending threating letters, but if there is not a threat of violence and just a threat of getting a person off a board they serve on.. come on grow up, you chose to run and serve and this does come with the territory even if it shouldn't!!!

    So lets look at this for what it appears to be!! An attempt to make all of McCook feel sorry for a board member, or even better a couple of board members. First of all I have gotten my fair share of HATE mail that was unsigned, and I am sure many a politician, business owner, teacher, coach, police officer has. But guess what we don't go to the Press and CRY about it we get rid of it, because an unsigned letter means NOTHING!!!

    Second and most importantly, if you have ever spoken to Mr. Messersmith you know he does not speak the way this written statement to the press was written!! Strange that it smacks of a lawyer, wonder who has ties to a lawyer??? WAKE UP MCCOOK!!

    EXAMPLE: "It is unfortunate that someone has tried to subvert the democratic process that our forefathers set into place."

    If I am not mistaken the "forefathers" said NOTHING in the Constitution about public schools or school boards?? You would think even the small town politicians would check their facts before speaking. BUT if you have followed some of the board members they rarely think before they speak!!

    -- Posted by myopinion1 on Sat, Nov 22, 2008, at 9:34 AM
  • Obviously, a threatening letter is ludicrous. I don't think you're very far off track ddt4 and myopinion1, and I agree that Larry should keep his enemies very close, especially with what has turned into such a political problem. It's every man (or woman) for him/herself now!! I wish we could go back to the prior school board, before Lyons, Messersmith and Shields were voted on. They've caused so much scrutiny on the school board in recent that everyone has lost sight of the board's real job - taking care of our children's education. I admittedly and regretfully voted for Shane and Diane when they were first on the ticket and, if I knew then what I know now, I never would have. My sincerest apologies McCook! By the way, in reading the comments to all these articles posted by ACP and McCook Gal, I think their the wives of two of the board members under close scrutiny right now . . . just making an observation. My apologies if I'm wrong (and my sympathies if I'm right).

    -- Posted by MakingApoint on Sat, Nov 22, 2008, at 9:59 AM
  • Has anyone noticed that while we've been focusing on who sent that letter, we've completely overlooked the fact that Messersmith basically admits that he has been completely clueless about what had been transpiring since the last school board meeting? Does he not read the Gazette, our blogs, or even talk to the public?

    Here's what he said, "I couldn't figure out what the letter was referring to since the board had already selected Gary to fill the vacancy at our Monday meeting. As far as I was concerned, the vote was final and everything was moving forward...

    It became clear to me late that afternoon when Larry Shields, school board president, called me about an upcoming special school board meeting...

    I put two and two together and realized that whoever had sent me the threatening letter knew about the upcoming meeting before I did, and the fact that I would have a chance to change my vote on Gary."

    I'm seeing more than one problem in this article... Besides the "threatening" letter, what is Messersmith doing on school board if he can't keep up???

    -- Posted by What I think... on Sat, Nov 22, 2008, at 10:51 AM
  • I am not married to either Shane nor Larry, I can't not believe some people!

    -- Posted by McCook Gal on Sat, Nov 22, 2008, at 3:56 PM
  • The way this whole mess is going, let's all do away with the school board, stop with all the bickering, and start over with new people. If no one can be trusted, let's do the right thing.

    Do we not have guts to start something new??? Does the school system want this to happen??? Shouldn't a higher power stand up and tell them to all shut their mouths?? And shouldn't this person straighten out the wrong???

    What happened the loyalty to our children????????

    -- Posted by edbru on Sat, Nov 22, 2008, at 7:30 PM
  • The ones using this tool would this be the same democratic socialist that pay you to farm.A lot of use dumb down people pay a lot of taxes for your government subsidies.

    -- Posted by ddt4mccook on Sat, Nov 22, 2008, at 7:39 PM
  • This is why we need to hire a Superintendant that has absolutly NO ties to ANYONE in the current administration. The superintendant has the responsability to tell the Board when the are "Out of line". We need someone who has no agenda and some real Balls. That can only come from outside the system. Politics do not belong in the school system. If we have board members that desire power and control, they need to be gotten rid of and replaced with people that can use their own common sense, do their own homework, decide for themselves whats right and explain why they feel the way they do and vote accordingly. They can't always make the popular decision but they can't be afford to be manipulated the way this group has. The public might be uninformed much of the time, but they are not STUPID. And it's time to let them know. Let's make sure we do this in a reasonable fashon and not as a bunch of screaming idiot's. If someone has something to say, say it as an informed and in control individual. Ask the hard question and hold some feet to the fire. Then watch their eyes. The eyes don't lie.

    -- Posted by Hugefan on Sun, Nov 23, 2008, at 9:27 PM
  • Good comments, Hugefan.

    I don't think getting rid of everyone on the school board is the answer, edbru. If you've noticed what's been happening lately is that the board has been split with 3-2 votes. Those three are the ones that voted Gary Power to the board, they're the ones that nixed the recent request for intramural sports, they are the ones in cahoots! That's wrong.

    I understand wanting an ag and art program, but someone made the comment a while back about where the real money is... In sports. Whether you like it or not, it's the truth, so our board needs to serve all our students (ag, art, and otherwise) whether they like it or not.

    Hopefully the public will attend the special meeting tonight and the board members will realize we're watching and taking note! Then, if they continue down this road, something should defnitely happen!

    -- Posted by What I think... on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, at 10:32 AM
  • First of all, The superintendant has the responsability to tell the Board when the are "Out of line" is wrong, Hugefan. It is just the opposite, the Board has the responsibility to tell the Sup. when he or she is out of line. Secondly, have people in McCook, including the School Board, forgotten aboou the most important part of what they are supposed to be doing, taking care of our kids! As far as the hate mail, etc. I wouldn't be surprised if the letter sent to Mr. Messersmith came from....Mr. Messersmith. I know him, I know Larry Shields and I wouldn't put it past him to do that. I also have HUGE concerns about Mr. Powers being put on the board when the likes of someone such as Mr. Bennett, who has years of GOOD experience as a Sup. in the McCook School system doesn't even make the grade. This in itself tells me that there's some behin the scenes talking going on here. Greed and power are both terrible things. Let's get this thing squared away and get back on track to educating our students!

    -- Posted by McCook Supporter on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, at 11:44 AM
  • First of all, for Hugefan, please realize that the School Board hires the Sup. That means that the Sup. answers to the School Board, not the other way around. Secondly, it's a sad day when School board members neglect their duty and purpose to make political motivated decisions. We the people vote for those who we feel will best serve to educate our youth. Obviously, speaking for myself, I failed to realize that there are some members who I voted for that don't have the youth's best interest as a priority. I know each and every board member personally. Some I like, some I don't really care for. However, that really doesn't matter in this case. The entire board is responsible for the decision that was made. Now, as for that decision. I find it extremely hard to understand why a past Sup. with several years of experience who is now retired and has the time and energy (or he wouldn't have thrown his hat in the ring) to VOLUNTEER to serve out the term is not a finalist. Another individual with several years of administrative school experience under his belt is not considered. Yet, a private contractor who used to teach, who ran for a position on the school board and was NOT voted in is now suddenly appointed to the board. Again, lets keep the youth's best interest in mind here. Politics stink sometimes and I can sure smell the stench right now.

    -- Posted by McCook Supporter on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, at 7:11 PM
  • McCook Supporter, you should have been at the meeting tonight... It was something! Of course, students are priority, but when the people we vote into office, or in this case - school board, manipulate the process, something needs to happen.

    Can't wait to read what's in the Gazette tomorrow! Tonight just proved that two of our board members are not playing with a full deck, and I'm afraid one is sadly unstable.

    Kudos to Tom and Mike for handling themselves professionally!

    -- Posted by What I think... on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, at 10:18 PM
  • OK McCook supporter, this is where the misconception comes from. When a Board hires a Super' they are hiring someone who has had a great deal of higher education to qualify them to do the job. You don't just hire some guy that comes in wanting a high pay job. With the title comes the reponsability of being informed of ALL aspects of the educational system. This includes knowing the do's and don'ts of the legal prosses under which the Board must operate. So althuogh the Super' might work for the Board, it is his duty to keep them from stepping in the wrong direction. Board members can be anyone who gets elected regardless of their education. They cannot be expected to know any of the rules of conduct when they accept the seat. The problem always lies with some Board members thinking that the job is to RUN the School the way they think it should be run. This is a huge misunderstanding. A good Super' will lead the board toward the goals that they set forth.He or she should also use their experience to educate the board and tell them when they are doing wrong. This helps the Board to aviod situations such as they find themselves in now. Board members are only required to do the best they can to set policies that are recommended by the poeple they hire to give them the best information available. That job falls to the chain of command. A good board listens to the recommendations, does it's homework, and makes good decisions. So when I say that it's the Supers' job to tell the Board when they are "Out of line" I am not wrong. How else are they going to know?

    -- Posted by Hugefan on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, at 10:54 PM
  • I was at tonight's meeting and I have to commend Larry Shields for (finally) listening to the majority. Not one person stood up (besides Diane Lyons) in support of Powers' appointment to the board. You gotta hand it to her - she's determined - obviously, not for the good of our children no matter how many people came to the meeting to show and voice their concerns regarding the Nov. 10th fiasco. Shame on Shane Messersmith for setting his sights on personally attacking Gonzales! He had no point to make whatsoever. His unprofessionalism surely showed he should not be on the board. I didn't know if I should feel sorry for his lack of intelligence and professionalism or simply be disgusted with him.

    -- Posted by MakingApoint on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, at 10:58 PM
  • Sorry for all the typo's

    -- Posted by Hugefan on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, at 10:59 PM
  • Lyons and Messersmith completely missed the point last night -- they were determined to prove why Power should be on the board. That's not why the public is in arms here -- it's because of the way he was voted in. Scott Johnson was clearly their top pick -- the board AS ONE UNIT gave him the best score, but where the process is flawed is having to pick someone for second place. I can see that if there was a tie for first and second, but not a tie for second and third. Johnson had it by quite a margin, so for the three of them to ignore that and vote the second place person in just proved they had an agenda. It was an insult to every single candidate that applied, but they don't see that. Lyons and Messersmith, especially, thought this was about Power. They just don't get it, and I was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt to set things straight, but after last night's meeting, I'm convinced they shouldn't be on the board! And Shields may have came through last night, but he did it with a pout on his face and rage in his heart. Let's see what happens at their next meeting on December 8...

    It's a shame the public even feels they have to attend these meetings. We should be able to trust those we voted into office to do their job. We can't! (Well, at least not Lyons, Messersmith, and Shields!)

    -- Posted by What I think... on Tue, Nov 25, 2008, at 8:04 AM
  • ok, did anyone else notice the time line with this letter? ALL ON THE SAME DAY, Messersmith received 'the letter', Bredvick called Shields requesting the special meeting, Shields called Messersmith about the special meeting. Now, the last time I mailed a letter in McCook to someone in McCook, it took atleast TWO days to get there. So, the problem I'm having, is Mr. Messersmith's addition of "putting two and two together" just doesn't add up. The letter writer must have ESP to have known atleast two days prior to Mr. Bredvick calling Mr. Shields that it was going to happen. just a thought.

    -- Posted by BurntToast on Wed, Nov 26, 2008, at 6:59 AM
  • Hugefan...first of all, please read your original posting. "The superintendant has the responsability to tell the Board when the are "Out of line". Now, I don't know about you, maybe you live off of food stamps or something, but if I'm the Superintendent and a Board member acts up like Mr. Shields did, I'm DEFINITELY not going to tell Mr. Shields that he is out of line. THAT, Hugefan, is the responsibility of the rest of the School Board. Now, you also state that, "Board members are only required to do the best they can to set policies that are recommended by the poeple they hire to give them the best information available. That job falls to the chain of command. A good board listens to the recommendations, does it's homework, and makes good decisions." This I agree with. However, we currently have a Superintendent with no local ties who is doing a very good job. We still had the problems that we had. Is this the fault of the Super. I don't think so. I think it's the fault of people, like myself, being fooled by some of these people who I didn't think played the politics game. I voted for them in hopes that they would do what's best for the kids. Once they sit in that seat, politics seem to kick in and they change their agenda. Shame on me!

    -- Posted by McCook Supporter on Wed, Nov 26, 2008, at 3:22 PM
  • LOL LOL LOL I'm sorry but the food stamp reference was fun as hell! Anyway, that is the difference between individuals. If I had been the Superintendant at the time Mr. Sheilds went ballistic, I would have had to remind him of the speech he gave at the beginning of the meeting about what would and would not be tolerated. But thats OK that you say you wouldn't. Part of the problem is the fear that has been created over the past years and prevents even the faculty from speaking up. Threats of repercussions should a teacher express their opinion. Not the kind of relationship those two groups should have. But anyway I absolutly agree that Mr. Schley has, is, and I hope will consider continuing to do the job. I think we all know that a Super' search at this time would be fruitless. If he would consider another year extension until we can resolve the issue at hand, It would be a welcome load removed from the school.

    -- Posted by Hugefan on Wed, Nov 26, 2008, at 8:29 PM
  • Where is the police investigation on this? Haven't seen any follow up information on what the mighty McCook P.D. have done on this? Our tax dollars at work.....

    -- Posted by BurntToast on Fri, Dec 5, 2008, at 3:16 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: