Split school board passes on top candidate for replacement

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

The candidate who earned first place -- by more than six points -- was not appointed Monday evening to fill the vacancy on the McCook Public Schools board of education.

Instead, three members of the board elected the candidate who initially was tied for second place.

To fill the vacancy created when board member and president Greg Larson resigned in October, seven candidates were interviewed during the regular board meeting Monday and ranked by each of the five remaining board members on a scale of 1-7 (1 being the highest score, 7 being the lowest).

In the ranking process recommended to the board in two legal opinions -- a process that board members Diane Lyons and Shane Messersmith tried to sidestep -- the top two candidates, identified by their lowest scores, would be the final candidates for the open seat. The ultimate winner would be decided after board discussion and through a formal motion and vote.

On the recommendation of the schools' legal counsel, all activities associated with the appointment process would be conducted in open session. The scoring sheets would become public information.

Lyons made a motion to appoint a candidate without using the number scoring system and with only the vote of three members; Messersmith seconded her motion. However, acting president/vice-president Larry Shields and fellow board members Tom Bredvick and Michael Gonzales voted no to that motion.

Bredvick then made a motion, seconded by Gonzales, to follow the advice of the schools' legal counsel and require that each board member individually score/rank each candidate. The qualifications of the top two candidates -- the two candidates with the lowest scores -- would be discussed by the board, a motion/second made and a vote conducted. A tie would require that the board members re-score only the two involved in the tie.

The lowest/best score after interviews was candidate Scott Johnson's 10 points. Tied for second place were Gary Power and Sandy Krysl, each with 16 points.

Other candidates' totals were: Colyn Suda and Cloyd Clark, 21 points each; Harold Bennett, 22 points; and LeRoy Jaggers, 29 points.

This is how each board member voted:

DIANE LYONS: Gary Power 1; Harold Bennett 7; Scott Johnson 1; Colyn Suda 6; LeRoy Jaggers 7; Cloyd Clark 6; and Sandy Krysl 7.

SHANE MESSERSMITH: Gary Power 1; Harold Bennett 7; Scott Johnson 1; Colyn Suda 7; LeRoy Jaggers 7; Cloyd Clark 3; Sandy Krysl 1.

LARRY SHIELDS: Gary Power 2; Harold Bennett 6; Scott Johnson 2; Colyn Suda 3; LeRoy Jaggers 7; Cloyd Clark 6; Sandy Krysl 3.

TOM BREDVICK: Gary Power 6; Harold Bennett 1; Scott Johnson 2; Colyn Suda 1; LeRoy Jaggers 4; Cloyd Clark 2; Sandy Krysl 1.

MIKE GONZALES: Gary Power 6; Harold Bennett 1; Scott Johnson 4; Colyn Suda 4; Leroy Jaggers 4; Cloyd Clark 4; Sandy Krysl 4.

In the tie-breaker between Power and Krysl, the votes were:

Diane Lyons: Power 1; Krysl 7 (She ranked Power 1 and Krysl 7 in the initial vote).

Shane Messersmith: Power 1; Krysl 7 (compared to 1 for Power and 1 for Krysl in the first vote).

Larry Shields: Power 3; Krysl 2 (compared to 2 for Power and 3 for Krysl in the first vote).

Tom Bredvick: Power 7; Krysl 1 (compared to 6 for Power and 1 for Krysl in the first vote).

Mike Gonzales: Power 6; Krysl 2 (compared to 6 for Power and 4 for Krysl in the first vote).

In the tie breaker, Power's score of 18 was one point lower than Krysl's 19. Ducking his head, Shields mumbled that Gary Power was the winner of the tie breaker. Power's name was then placed among the top two finishers.

Following the tie breaker, Bredvick made a motion to appoint Scott Johnson -- who had finished in first place -- to fill Larson's position on the board; Gonzales seconded the motion. Bredvick and Gonzales voted for Johnson. Lyons, Messersmith and Shields voted no.

Lyons then made a motion to appoint Power, a motion seconded by Messersmith. Lyons, Messersmith and Shields voted yes. Bredvick voted no, and Gonzales -- who prefaced his vote with, "This stinks of politics" -- also voted no.

Shields quickly adjourned the meeting.


During his interview, candidate LeRoy Jegger told board members -- in an Arkansas accent that made people smile and broke some of the mounting tension in the room -- it is obvious from their actions and from reports of their meetings: "You're divided. I'm sorry -- but you're divided." But he said, with his experience as a superintendent of schools for 29 years in Kansas, he may be the candidate who could bring the board together.

" ... you are divided," Jaggers said. "I'm not going to say who. I can see it. I can read it in the paper."

Jaggers told board members his motive for wanting on the board "may be a little selfish," explaining that he doesn't know of any better way to make an impact on a community than by serving on the board of education. "I want to be a part of the board," he said. "All I know is school."

To the question, "What qualities make a good board member?," Jaggers said a good board member must listen, take everything into consideration and make decisions without bias. Jaggers said he believes in strong, up-to-date curriculum.

Jegger said the role of the board member is to follow board policy. "Let the administrators do their job," he said. "You just follow board policy."

Each of the seven candidates were asked the same questions:

1. Reasons for applying for the board vacancy.

2. What experience would you bring to this position?

3. What qualities do you believe make a good school board member?

4. What goals/visions for the school district do you have for the next six years?

Gary Power was the first candidate before the board: He said he is interested in education and attends board meetings. His son is in high school and he is curious about school and concerned about education.

Power said he was a teacher in the past and has been in business since 1979. He is experienced in athletics, he said.

Power said it is important that board members listen to patrons, teachers and administrators and then evaluate the information. A job, if it's done right, Power said, requires homework; it's important that board members take the time to do research, especially on items before the committees.

With today's economy, Power said, his goal would be to hold and maintain what the school has now. He's pleased, he said, with the return of the ag program and its new teacher, and with the Central art program, although, he said, the school district needs more art.

Power said he doesn't take a lot of time discussing items. "I'm pretty much to the point," he said.


Harold Bennett, McCook's superintendent of schools until his retirement in 1993, said it was appropriate that he kept a low profile after his retirement. His experience in the position as McCook's superintendent, however, would insure that he could come up to speed quickly. "I believe I have that experience, background and temperament to be a contributing board member immediately," Bennett said.

Bennett said his entire life's career has been in education -- from a rural school in 1950 to his superintendency in McCook. In 1996, he was elected to the board of governors of Mid Plains Community College area, and served two four-year terms. He was elected vice chairman three times and finished the final two years as chairman of the board. While on the board, Bennett served on instruction, facilities and personnel negotiations committees, and chaired the committee that rewrote board policies.

Bennett said he possesses "a genuine interest in young people and their future welfare," and has "an appreciation for providing a good education for all students."

About boardsmanship, Bennett said, "Although a good board member must be able to make sound decisions and hold to their convictions, they must be willing to compromise and support the majority board decisions." He continued, "They can't impede progress of the board."

Bennett said he has no specific "agenda," except to "help assure a sound, quality educational program for our community's young people, taking into consideration our community's resources and needs."

Bennett said it will be vital that the public school system continue to create partnerships with Mid Plains and McCook Community College.


Scott Johnson, who works for 21st Century Systems in McCook, said three of his four children are enrolled in McCook Public Schools. "I'm interested in school, in teachers, the administration," and the level of education available to every child. "The school drives the success of the community," Johnson said. He wants a school that empowers students to succeed, he said, and to know that after college graduation, returning to McCook "can be rewarding."

Johnson said he is a graduate of the University of Nebraska at Kearney, and as a business owner, has experience with business finances, budgets, management and personnel, and with interacting with the public.

He is detail-oriented, he said.

A board member must be committed, be trustworthy, decisive and consistent, Johnson said. He/she must interact effectively with fellow board members, administrators and the public. "He must listen to the tax payers," Johnson said. "He is a steward" of the tax payers' money.

Johnson said he would like to see an increased level of involvement by parents, and is concerned with safety concerns, pointing out that "McCook is not isolated, not shielded" from the problems of the world.

The district's new superintendent will have to be a "visionary," Johnson said.


Colin Suda said that although he "typically avoids situations where tomatoes can be thrown at me," he is interested in serving on the board as a way to become more involved in his children's lives, and, "because someone was there to do it for me."

Suda said that he has worked as an auditor of school activities in Kansas, and through his work experience at Southwest Public Power District in Palisade, is aware of the workings of a board.

Suda said a board member must be honest and have integrity and "a thick skin." He said he is aware that any decision can make someone unhappy, but, he said, a board member must vote his/her conscious and then, as in sports, move on to the next play.

Suda said he has no preconceived notion of where the school should be in the next six years, but he did say he would like it to move more in the direction of technology.


Cloyd Clark said he applied for the McCook school board vacancy as a way to "give back to the community. The work of the school and the board is the most important work in the community," he said

As a county judge, Clark said, he worked with young people, not all with criminal violations. "I dealt with lots of children and family situations," he said. As an active member of McCook's Rotary Club, he said, he sees the positive side of the community. "I have seen a broad section of young people and families," Clark said.

Clark said that he always enjoyed school, the university and law school. He has been involved also in adult education, training staff and judges. He has developed analytical skills that would be valuable to the board, he said.

Clark said he is a good listener, values education, works well with others and understands the role of the board and administration.

Clark said he has no agenda to bring before the board, but wants to continue long-range fiscal planning and a commitment to excellence in academics, sports and student leadership.

The school has more opportunities to make a difference than any other agency in the community, Clark said. He wants the McCook school system to give students the skills to thrive, hopefully in McCook, but also "anywhere they would go."


Sandy Krysl said he husband called her "a glutton for punishment" when she decided to apply for the empty board position. "I care about kids," she said. "Children deserve the best education we can offer them." She wants students to have a good educational experience, and want to return to McCook and raise their families.

Krysl said she has "a responsibility to give back to the community."

As a clinic manager and business owner, Krysl said, she has experience with dealing with the public, and is a good listener and effective communicator. She also has budget experience.

Krysl said a board's responsibility is to develop plans and then let administrators carry out those plans.

"I have a love for all kids," she said. "I want to help them do their best."

Krysl said that the selection of a new superintendent and the hiring of new teachers to replace those retiring are important decisions facing the board. She wants the board to have the tools needed to recruit young people and young families to McCook.

She wants to continue to raise the academic standards of students and maintain communication within the board.

Comments
View 48 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • How do you possibly rank the past superintendent at the lowest???? It sure sounds like there are three board members that have their own agenda and are not putting the best interest of the public or schools first. Let's hope they do not completely ruin our schools.

    -- Posted by Whoopie on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 12:18 PM
  • A bizarre process all around. So you let your future peers decide if you are good enough and then you have a perfect idea what they think of you? It is obvious there are factions within the board. You can tell by the voting. Either former Superintendent Bennett had to discipline the current board members when they were in high school or they plainly were threatened by the idea of having someone of his qualifications on their board. I'm not saying he had to be chosen, but how could he be rated so low? Two 7s and a 6?

    -- Posted by Viking on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 12:43 PM
  • I think that the board of education needs to now just get back to the basics of higher learning. We will now have a full board again and they need to stop their bickering and do what is right for our kids. Power at least talked about getting an art program back into the elementary school which we have been lacking for far too long. Looks like he supports the ag program also by his comments and I think that our entire town knows how important that ag is to this community. I think that we should give him our support and unless you have put your name in so be on school board should not just sit back and crab about it.

    -- Posted by McCook Gal on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 1:09 PM
  • Being a Graduate of McCook, I was saddened to see the results. Bennett has been a great leader in our community and has always put education first. Which should be the reasoning behind the school board !!!! There is a clear division in the school board and now after the elections I believe it will be even worse. Good Luck Tom stay strong !!

    -- Posted by Graduate2 on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 2:24 PM
  • I agree Whoopie, it appears that three of these board members have personal agendas which require a board that they can control and they now have.

    How do you possibly rank a candidate that was a past superintendent, a vice-chairman and chairman of the board of governors to Mid-Plains College who has experience with negotiations, school budgets and board policy with a 6, 7, & 7; and give a 1, 1 and 2 to someone who is curious about school? Unbelievable, just totally unbelievable.

    Clearly we as a school district are in for a long costly ride for our students over the next couple of years unless . . .

    -- Posted by emidge on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 4:03 PM
  • I think the school board did just fine with their appointment of Gary Power for the vacant seat. The "elections" were done well and within the legal parameters. I don't see how people can have a problem with a fair appointment of a qualified candidate who has the best interests of the school system as his agenda. Speaking of being having a bias, it appears that our McCook Daily Gazette has, in recent issues, been biased towards one or two of the current school board members and has been neglecting others.

    -- Posted by out-of-towner on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 4:34 PM
  • So, somebody who is "curious" about school is more qualified than somebody whose entire life's career has been in education? Wake up, people. Certain board members have their own agendas and they have nothing to do with our children!

    -- Posted by go against the flow on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 4:45 PM
  • out-of-towner; What part of this process do you consider to be "fair"? Board Members Lyons and Messersmith, as quoted in the story, are on record for wanting to ignore the recommendation of using the procedure in the first place!

    It's one thing to have a hidden agenda within an elected governing body, but these people aren't even classy or smart enough to try to subdue their intentions! Maybe they're just too brazen to care.

    I applaud each of the seven people who had the intitiative to apply for this vacancy in the first place. I'm sure each are well-qualified in their own right. If I were a sitting Board Member, I would be fairly ashamed of myself for allowing any fellow member for wanting to sidestep the legally suggested methods, and then vote to nominate a candidate who did NOT receive the best score to fill the position.

    Maybe a carefully worded letter to the State Association of School Boards or the Department of Education would be in order. If everything is on the "up and up", there wouldn't be anything to worry about. But if there are some "backroom politics" going on, and if the "good ol' boy" ways are still in place, it can be brought to light with someone higher than the local level.

    -- Posted by Willie B Wright on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 5:13 PM
  • I want to commend the 3 board members that voted Gary Power to the board. As a concerned parent these last few years over the direction of our current administration, I think is about time that we have a board that can get things moving in the right direction. I for one know the time that Gary has put in following what is going on in our school system. He attends most all board meetings. He is also well aware of all the current problems in the system. I don't think you have to be a former superintendent or a big name in the community to be voted on to this board. I think that standing up for what is right and getting a well rounded education for our children is far more important in a board member. I think Gary Power can help those board members that have that belief work to achieve that goal. It would really be nice to see our current administration held accountable. Let's work together to better our children's educations, lets give this board a chance to work through the many tasks that are ahead of them...and maybe just maybe we can get back to the basics of a well rounded education, with children that are respectful and are held accountable for academics and attendance (especially at the high school level).

    -- Posted by Another Concerned Parent on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 5:21 PM
  • This sounds like an election that was made up as it went along. Where do they come up with these types of elections?? I agree that some people have their own agenda. How can we argue with some people who think they know everything.

    I also hope that the best interest is in the children and their education and not other interests that don't have anything to do with the school.

    -- Posted by edbru on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 6:14 PM
  • The first thing you might notice is that when a teacher suspects that students are cheating it's usually due to identical scores or answers. Obviously there were some shared bits prior to the meeting. Even an uninformed reader could see the results of this process was entirely planned ahead of time. The actions of Lyons and Messersmith are not that shocking, but at least Sheilds put up a inept attempt to not be a blatent puppet. I just hope that a local anesthesia was used prior to the rings being inserted into these mens noses. How unbelievably embarrasing for them to have to now be seen in public knowing that they are just being manipulated into playing the fool. I really thought that some sort of self respect might prevent them from playing politics instead of just using their own common sense to make decisions for our kids. Why is it that they need someone else to tell them how they should think, unless someone has convinced them that it is neccesary to maintain a balance of power. Sounds a lot like the old city council. Doesn't it? Thanks to the Gazette for giving us complete information on this. I hope the reporting continues to point out the obvious blunders that are happening. And remember Board members. We are now carefully watching!

    -- Posted by Hugefan on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 7:39 PM
  • Hugefan...I don't think you have followed this issue very closely. If you had, you would have known that the board members you are commenting on actually are more honest than you give them credit for...the reason are current board is faced with these decisions, is because other board members ignored the truth or chose to not get involved with the issues at hand of the board member that stepped down. I believe these board members that elected Gary Power have no hidden agenda...they see a man that can help to bring this school back to the standards in which it use to be. I feel, in order for them to get anything done they need the majority vote...They have NOTHING to be ashamed of or to hide from in this community. As for the gazette...I think it would be wise for the reporter to report ALL sides not just what they think they hear or what will please the public. I know for a fact in recent years not all information has been accurate,people have been missed quoted and stories have been one sided. I think it is really amusing all the people that are fighting the newly elected board. What are you afraid of, accountably...policies that would make our administration accountable to someone, programs that would give our children a well rounded education, academic standards for all athletes??? I think we should all take a step back and give this board a chance to work for the better of our children.

    -- Posted by Another Concerned Parent on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 8:32 PM
  • What the heck are you talking about? Our standards? Our testing levels of our students is at an all time high you idiot. Maybe you need to pay a little more attention! The reason for my prior coments are in black and white on the page above. I can see for myself how they voted, I don't need to assume anything. It's all spelled out. Wake up and smell the coffee. It's boiling on the burner and smells like bull@#$#. And you know absolutely nothing about the former member, that much I gaurantee. As far as accountability, let's talk to Don Marchant! Nuff said.

    -- Posted by Hugefan on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 9:11 PM
  • Hugefan..I beg to differ...I don't think you have all the information on the test scores...they give you the information that you want to hear. Dig in a little deeper..you may be suprised just how the testing process occurs in the school system....I think there is a lot that needs to be changed before our test scores will be at an all time high. High by who's standards!!! On the former board member...I do know him personally...I do know how he was pushed out of the school board. So I feel your comments on calling me an idiot are way out of line. Whether Gary Powers was the top man after the initial tally has nothing to do with it...From the beginning the board was going to vote on the top two...and from the way I read the information that is in black in white...these 3 board members for what ever reason feel that Gary Power is the better man for the job. Just because we have 3 board members who are on the same page doesn't mean that they planned it ahead of time. I watched Don Marchant in action...he did absolutely nothing for our school system,he did not hold administration accountable...he just joined them for cold ones after the board meeting...I think that is why members of the board are working to change things and make sure the next superintendent has our children's best interest at heart...NUFF said!!!

    -- Posted by Another Concerned Parent on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 9:33 PM
  • It is obvious that self preservation of individual board members is more important than the education of the students. This whole thing is like a bad episode of "Survivor". Harold Bennett's experience is exactly what the board needs. Especially in this current economic crisis. The ultimate decision lies in the hands of the community. I hope the community organizes a recall and throws these idiots off the island. This is not some high school student council, this is the governing body of the future the community.

    -- Posted by embarrassed on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 9:50 PM
  • ACP, I can't believe you openly admitted the board is divided and one of the main concerns is getting a majority vote. I never knew the prerequisite to being a board member was choosing sides beforehand. I didn't see any of the questions as to which "side" any of the seven would lean nor did I see any responses as such. Your statement about choosing Mr. Powers to get a majority vote makes me think some of the board already knew which way he leaned. What about the others? Did the board know how they were leaning? I highly doubt it. This tells me the whole process was orchestrated and the results were predetermined. I expected more out of our elected officials.

    -- Posted by norm on Tue, Nov 11, 2008, at 11:13 PM
  • Strange how name calling twists thinking-- or maybeso that is it prevents thinking.

    Let us compare the lives of a Hitchcock County native and a man with nativity rooted in Frontier County.

    The Hitchcock boy grew up in reduced circumstances. A $150 per month "shotgun" along the Republican, with a widowed father who survived with handyman jobs around the area during winter, working the farms during other seasons -- plus four hours daily in the feedlots, loading and hauling manure.

    The boy applied himself at school, practiced basketball with a home-made hoop on a big cottonwood stump and worked wherever he could.

    He earned admission to a prestigous private college over in Iowa, and then to a New England Ivy League university, earning highest honors at both, while working "wherever" to survive.

    The Frontier County boy grew up an Army brat. His dad was a WWII vet, who stayed in and actually earned some serious brass on his uniform. The son avoided serious effort. In fact, partied hardy with people his father disapproved of.

    His father's C.O. got the boy an appointment to the West Point Prep School, where the discipline and determined teachers made him learn and gain admission to West Point for a four-year education, with uniforms, food, housing, medical/dental/vision care and a monthly salary, plus transportation provided summers and holidays to visit his parents. Usually he preferred to find a party, with lots of liquid refreshment and very friendly females. He managed to graduate, no honors or distinction, but he graduated.

    Both want to return to Southwest Nebraska and enter business.

    All any of us have to consider, which of these men would we want to pay $100,000 annually to start and keep our school district working, or help manage a city or county, or build our business?

    Do you choose the tipsy playboy cadet, or the fellow with hands wrapped around bootstraps?

    Think about it.

    The American people recently made a clear choice and some "Real Americans" continue wanting to reward the womanizing party animal.

    Would you hire a school principal who handed the mother of his three children divorce papers while she lay near death in a cancer ward?

    Would you hire a police chief who in his last post, shacked up with a much younger, rich playgirl and neglected his family?

    Several good Nebraska Republicans are probably resentful that this raving liberal prefers hiring a man with a lifetime of earned credentials, stable character and high morals.

    After a lifetime of farming and ranching and making payrolls in several businesses -- I still hire on merit, ability, proven intelligence and integrity and a positive attitude.

    Let any person walk in asking for my job, while condemming his previous bosses, blaming his ex-wife for his adultery, and telling me all other applicants are a bunch of lying thieves --

    and I will not hire them.

    How about you?

    -- Posted by HerndonHank on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 6:29 AM
  • I agree with Hugefan, this thing stinks to high heaven. When you have a candidate that unanimously scores higher by far than everyone else, and then you porposly choose someone else, someone is dealing from the bottom of the deck. There is no excuse for the way the vote went. Even in the second tie breaker vote, Mr. Sheilds scored Johnson higher than Powers, and then voted for Powers. How much integrity does that take. Don't tell me it wasnt a set up. I'm not that ignorant. Shame on you Larry, I thought you had more style.

    -- Posted by bison fan88 on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 8:39 AM
  • Bottom line is the school board was very shady in this whole process. How can our elected officials appoint someone who has been turned down by the voters of this district for the very same position. In his interview Mr Powers stated he felt it was very important to listen to the patrons, teachers and administrators and then evaluate the information. His next comment is "I don't take a lot of time discussing items,I'm pretty much to the point.????? I wonder why the district has not elected him before. He doesn't even pay attention to what he's talking about. Do we want this person listening to our concerns about the future of our school district. Did Lyons, Messersmith or Shields pay attention to any of this, did they truly feel because of his failed attempts at this position he was the one the public would want in this position. What exactly are his qualifications. The board members who wanted Mr. Powers in office are part of the problem small town governments create. They have their own agenda and do not have the best interests for the district, our teachers who serve this district, or the students who hope to be educated in this district. What is up with this board?? Under a cloud of secrecy, our School Board President abruptly resigns with no indication as to why. If an individual is an elected official, don't those who put their trust and faith in this individual deserve to know if something is out of line? Were improper practices behind this move???? Are other school board members behind this practice? We as voters of this district deserve these answers and we deserve board members who truly act as elected officials put in office with trust and confidence of the voters of the McCook School District. They have tried to pull one over on us. Ms. Lyons did not even want the the votes tallied because she knows that this is public record and when the public found out her motives it would create a problem. This is what we currently have for a school board. I work hard and am proud of McCook and our Public Schools System. My taxes help support this district. I do not want the three members and the appointed member mentioned above working for our district. We need young teachers to want to come to McCook and teach, not cross us off of their list because of the politics of this board. I want our veteran teachers to stay in McCook and continue to lead our youth into the future, and not leave because of the politics of this board. It is very difficult to recruit young educators into Nebraska because of our low pay scale situation, and now the McCook School District has its own drawback. The arrogance and ignorance of some of our current board members. We wonder sometimes why there is a shortage of citizens willing to serve the public, here is one of the reasons. We need Lyons , Messersmith, and Shields to be removed from the board now. We have systems set in place to take care of problems like this, we just need to take that action.

    -- Posted by Redbird1 on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 11:47 AM
  • It would appear that the interviews were not really needed, Mrs.Lyons, Mr. Shields, and Mr. Messersmith had already decided on who was going to fill the seat before the night even began. They have violated the trust that has been bestowed on them by the voters of this district and have once again made a mockery of our educational system. If they have any integrity left, which I doubt, they should resign their positions from the School Board immediately or the patrons from our district should remove them through a recall. Just a guess, out of towner or another concerned parent it is nice that you stick up for your husband!!!!

    -- Posted by Graduate2 on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 12:37 PM
  • I for one am in favor of a recall, let me know where I sign.

    I have been watching the action of the board since Shields and Messersmith were elected. If you recall they could not run their election on separate merits, they ran together. Stands to reasons they would vote together.

    Lyons, Messersmith and Shields you should respectfully submit your resignations from the McCook School Board. Mr. Powers you should declined the nomination. If any of you truly put the interest of the school district and our students first (1st) and not seventh (7th) then you will do what is right and submit your resignations.

    -- Posted by emidge on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 1:38 PM
  • With any election, there is room to debate the candidates, process and outcome. There was one on Nov 4 that I did not care for the outcome and I am still not sure that we have the best process. You have a board of 5 so each one is under a powerful microscope. McCook is a very small place, the odds of you literally bumping into these members are quite high. A legal process was followed and now you have to make your lemonade. If the result was not what you wanted, suck it up and figure out how to make the best of the situation. Again, a reference to the outcome from the past Nov 4th. Here is what you have that you did not have before: You now have a member of the board that has been on the outside looking in with no real allegiances to school's machine. You have a real life Maverick that prefers to measure twice and cut once. You have a very concerned parent of two students that will have guts to make a tough decision based on many, many years of experience. It may not be the most popular for the moment but Mr. Power will cast votes that will serve the greatest good. From reading prior articles and a few encouters with Mr. Power, I know that he was educated instate, taught in NE and CA, and has received the rest of his experiences around the world. I honestly believe, and time will prove me correct, that the other board members have a fear of Mr. Power. He is not conventional. He is not cookie-cutter. He is not typical McCook. This as bad as you think that it is. So many people have been upset with the Board in the past and yet you keep voting in the exact same type of people. Learn something here. Mr. Power will cause the board to work hard and be accountable. He has the years of experience to see people come in and out of these positions, see their policies, and has been around here long enough to see what has worked and what has not. While you may not see this as a success right now because of the process and consider yourselves lucky that the right person was chosen for the job. Do yourselves and the McCook School system a favor, take the time to see what happens here. If you have ever, I mean ever taken an interest in the Board of Education, give Mr. Power a chance to shake of the status quo a bit.

    -- Posted by LookingBack on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 2:22 PM
  • Hurray for extremely biased reporting! Now this does show a sorry state of our schools when one of the first things i learned in journalism at McCook Public Schools was to leave the biase OUT of the reporting.

    Also what you learn about with democracy is that Majority rules. Now Mr. Power clearly won over the majority of the board, and until someone can CLEARLY bring something forward that doesn't run on conspiracy and suspicion, I say, be quiet and lets give Mr. Power a chance.

    "Lyons made a motion to appoint a candidate without using the number scoring system and with only the vote of three members; Messersmith seconded her motion. However, acting president/vice-president Larry Shields and fellow board members Tom Bredvick and Michael Gonzales voted no to that motion."

    Then.... "Following the tie breaker, Bredvick made a motion to appoint Scott Johnson -- who had finished in first place -- to fill Larson's position on the board; Gonzales seconded the motion. Bredvick and Gonzales voted for Johnson. Lyons, Messersmith and Shields voted no."

    Oh look, both sides did it. But most of you didn't see that. Looks like Bredvick and Gonzales could have had a SECRET AGENDA! Conspiracy? Corruption?

    -- Posted by teejayP on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 2:45 PM
  • How do you get Biased reporting from the tally sheets above. Go back and read! Sheilds scored Johnson higher than Powers, and then did what he promised to do. Fold like a paper house in a stiff breeze. We've all seen this before. This isn't some new scandal, it's just Lyons business as usuall. You can visit with Gary in Phil's office or find him on the end of Diannes leash. He's been on board with that group for years. Again.....shame on you Larry and Shane. The two of you can fix this before it goes any farther if you have any self respect at all. It may be time to save face before all integrity is lost!

    -- Posted by bison fan88 on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 3:30 PM
  • I agree. With everyone wanting to see some calming of the waters, and all the talk about Board togetherness, it seems the Big 3 missed the perfect opportunity to prove themselves by appointing their own hands down favorite candidate in Scott Johnson. But instead played the back room method of remaining in "CONTROL". Nice job guys and gal. Good luck with the upcoming storm.

    -- Posted by Hugefan on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 4:48 PM
  • Kudos to you for the editorial tonight. I am so pleased that you took a stand concerning the proceedings of the school board. Their actions Monday night are a travesty of justice and a severe threat to the future education of our young people in McCook. k-flaska

    -- Posted by kflaska on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 6:14 PM
  • I'm so sorry McCook... I actually voted for Lyons, Messersmith, and Shields at one time. I thought a woman with education experience on school board would be a good thing, but I wasn't fooled twice! And you boys, it may be too late to save face, but you still need to cut those puppet strings for the duration of your term.

    I was disappointed after this last election when I discovered that Gonzales wasn't going to serve us another term, but after this last fiasco, I'm thinking he's a lucky man!

    My thoughts and prayers are with you, Tom. And good luck, Maury, looks like you're in for an adventure!

    -- Posted by What I think... on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 7:45 PM
  • The appointment of Gary Power to the school board is a total insult to the other applicants who presented themselves in a highly professional manner during their interviews. I appreciate the applicants for their dedication to our community. I am appalled and angered at the predetermined appointment of Mr. Power to the board. As for Mrs. Lyons and her puppets, I feel a recall is in order.

    -- Posted by insulted on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 9:08 PM
  • I hope that the football parents that forced Greg to resign have thier kids enrolled in the ag program at school. For the other parents that think the football program gets what the want, I don't know what the gate at the home games comes to, but I do know that the money goes into the school district for all to use. How many seats are you going to fill with a livestock show or an art show.

    -- Posted by ddt4mccook on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 9:41 PM
  • Did everyone who appears to be so upset with Diane vote in the election that occurred just one week ago? If my facts are right, Lyons received 2,146 votes compared to Mike Gonzales' votes of 2,094. A margin of 52 votes is keeping her in office for four more years and giving strength to the block of three (four?). It seems kind of silly to me to be talking about recalling someone that we just voted back into office a week ago. And remember, it was a resignation of a school board member that caused all of this turmoil to start with.

    -- Posted by mccook mom on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 9:50 PM
  • So what you are saying is it's OK for Lyons to have the seat because she scored higher than Gonzales, but not for Scott Johnson who scored higher than Power. Interesting concept there mccook mom. Somehow I'm confused.

    -- Posted by Hugefan on Wed, Nov 12, 2008, at 11:48 PM
  • I'm not defending her - I'm just saying that we voted her in office to make decisions for us. If the majority of us were upset about the decisions she has made in the past, we shouldn't have elected her one week ago. Any if she is recalled/resigns at this point, Shields, Messersmith, Bredvick, Powers, and Maury Green will have to decide who replaces her for FOUR years - the remainder of her term.

    -- Posted by mccook mom on Thu, Nov 13, 2008, at 8:12 AM
  • Do you really think that she will be the only one recalled? I'm leaning more toward 3 being thrown out and a special election being held to let the voters replace them. America seems to be geared toward Democracy. Or at least it's supposed to be!

    -- Posted by bison fan88 on Thu, Nov 13, 2008, at 8:42 AM
  • mccook mom, you can't blame Larson's resigning the cause of this recent turmoil, or the unfortunate fact that Lyons was voted back onto school board. It's the process that has caused this turmoil, and more specifically, the politics of three board members.

    -- Posted by What I think... on Thu, Nov 13, 2008, at 8:59 AM
  • REALLY those people on here saying that 3 of the board members have NOT acted at least unethically are in denial. Or possibly they are so corrupt themselves they see ignoring legal counsel, violating open meeting laws, and fixing the selection process of an appointment as being alright to do.

    I guess we live in a community where democratic ideals are lacking in some and sadly it seems at least 3 of our current Board of Education members fit that category!

    As for recalling someone who was just elected, recalls can happen anytime to anyone. You as an ELECTED official are duty bound to the electorate and if those officials choose to continue to act unethically they can be removed!!

    As for whoever said that this looks like what the city council did a few years ago, there is a parallel. You figure that out!!

    -- Posted by myopinion1 on Thu, Nov 13, 2008, at 9:29 AM
  • On Monday night I understood what Forrest Gump was saying.

    "Stupid is as stupid does"

    Forrest's version of the saying means that stupidity is not just a

    surface thing derived from a person's appearance. Stupidity is a

    matter of deeds, not looks. Like the other versions, it comes down to

    this: judge people by what they do, not by how they appear.

    -- Posted by Graduate2 on Thu, Nov 13, 2008, at 2:20 PM
  • Recall laws. Shields and Messersmith can be recalled now. Power can be recalled as soon as he is seated because he was not elected by a vote of the people. Lyons can not be recalled until June because she has to be seated at least 6 months after she was elected by law. It would take about 730 signatures on a petition to force a recall election. Anyone interested.

    -- Posted by lugnut on Thu, Nov 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM
  • As Lyons has not reached the end of her old term, could she not be recalled now with Messersmith and Shields?

    -- Posted by emidge on Thu, Nov 13, 2008, at 8:30 PM
  • I am sure there are more than enough willing to sign a recall. I have been disappointed in our school board and think it is time to end this. We know it will always be a 4-2 vote when Powers is seated. Not impressed with Shields/Messersmith from the beginning and have lost all respect for them now. They don't care about our kids and schools, just like to see their names in print and sound important.

    -- Posted by mrbj on Thu, Nov 13, 2008, at 9:40 PM
  • If anyone has information on the recall and where to sign, please post it here so I can participate. Thanks.

    -- Posted by go against the flow on Fri, Nov 14, 2008, at 7:59 AM
  • As per human nature, nothing about a recall will happen. A week or two will go by and people will forget this ever happened. People like to raise their voices when injustices are indirectly thrown at them, but when it gets to the point of actually doing anything about it, they don't.

    -- Posted by norm on Fri, Nov 14, 2008, at 2:49 PM
  • I think Diane, Shane and Larry took the Bison Football battle cry of "We are One" to literal.

    -- Posted by Graduate2 on Fri, Nov 14, 2008, at 3:16 PM
  • Norm;

    I pray you're wrong, but believe you are right.

    Look back at the flap created when Mr. Larson abruptly resigned. There was an awful lot of idle chatter, both in this forum and in the various eateries in town, of "...something needs to be done!" But as we all know, nothing was.

    This is turning out just like a playground shouting match...how appropriate the topic of conversation happens to be school-related!

    -- Posted by Willie B Wright on Fri, Nov 14, 2008, at 4:06 PM
  • Maybe not this time. I know an attorney has been contacted

    -- Posted by Hugefan on Fri, Nov 14, 2008, at 5:22 PM
  • SOMEONE NEEDS TO GET RID OF THE ADMINISTRATION=LAWS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED- Open meeting a little bit late.

    Standards of Conduct and Ethics is set forth in Title 92, Nebraska Administrative Code, Chapter 27STANDARDS OF

    CONDUCT AND ETHICS

    Management techniques: The educator shall:

    · Resolve discipline problems in accordance with law, school board policy, and administrative regulations and policies; Bligh v. Douglas County,NE.

    005.04C Each administrator shall:

    005.04C1 Support the creation of interest by providing the materials, equipment and

    encouragement necessary for the teacher to accomplish the designated task;

    005.04C2 Make reasonable assignment of tasks and duties in light of individual

    abilities and specialties and available personnel resources.

    CHAPTER 27

    005.06B Maintain consistency in the application of policy and practice;

    005.08E Explain methods and procedures of evaluation to those concerned.

    no explanation since their has been violations of the evaluation procedure for four years.

    005.04C Each administrator shall:

    005.04C1 Support the creation of interest by providing the materials, equipment and

    encouragement necessary for the teacher to accomplish the designated task;

    005.04C2 Make reasonable assignment of tasks and duties in light of individual

    abilities and specialties and available personnel resources.

    WHAT BECOMES OF ONE WHEN THE JUSTICE IS NOT FOLLOWED?

    How can McCookies live with them selves?????

    Hope your lives are going along wonderfully and I sure hope what comes around goes arounds.

    Prior edukator with dishonest administration.

    -- Posted by edukator on Fri, Nov 14, 2008, at 8:59 PM
  • Standards of Conduct and Ethics is set forth in Title 92, Nebraska Administrative Code, Chapter 27STANDARDS OF

    CONDUCT AND ETHICS

    You think they adhering to the open/closed formal meeting ploicies- a little too late.

    Management techniques: The educator shall:

    · Resolve discipline problems in accordance with law, school board policy, and administrative regulations and policies;

    Bligh v. Douglas County,NE.

    · Maintain consistency in the application of policy and practice;

    Its too bad teachers must teach under bad administrators,directors and supervisers that are not truthful.

    Prior edukator--

    -- Posted by edukator on Fri, Nov 14, 2008, at 9:12 PM
  • Hugefan please keep us updated as to when the petition will be available to sign. I know several people that are eager to sign, we just need to know where.

    -- Posted by emidge on Sat, Nov 15, 2008, at 9:33 PM
  • If each of you who posted comments of concern regarding the process the School Board used to appoint the new member (Mr. Power), PLEASE plan to attend the special meeting of the Board of Education on Monday, November 24th, at 6 p.m. at the Junior High Conference Room!

    If just that many people are in attendance, it will send a clear message to the entire Board that the parents, patrons, and taxpayers of this district will NOT sit idly by while "backroom politics" are played.

    Please plan to attend this special meeting in an effort to keep everything this body does above the table and in full view of the public and the media. Mrs. Lyons, Mr. Messersmith, and Mr. Shields showed sufficient evidence they would like very much to make the School Board a social organization by appointing someone they felt they could manipulate.

    This is your chance, citizens of McCook, to make your opinions heard without the time and expense of a recall election. Even if you do not speak up, just your attendance will send the right message.

    -- Posted by Willie B Wright on Wed, Nov 19, 2008, at 9:22 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: