Now why the G-3 chose to land at McCook is a more intriguing story. Shirley Wheelbarger, expediter, coordinator, secretary and friend who works at Red Willow Aviation, had earlier received a call requesting "catering." Not only does Griff offer most attractive prices for jet fuel, catering is available too on request and courtesy cars free for the use by the flight crew are a given.
The G-3 was carrying a load of golfers on a tour playing "interesting" golf courses around the US. They had just played the recently opened high roller invitation only golf course snuggled into the sand hills south of Holyoke, Colo. Holyoke has a modern new runway capable of handling large executive jets but little in the way of refueling or passenger services. You land and you are on your own.
Shirley had received a call from the hostess (we used to call them stewardess but somehow that appellation is no longer politically correct) on the G-3 crew hoping to arrange a menu of filet mignon, baked potato a couple appetizers and more. She in turn called Mitch and Candy at the Looking Glass to prepare the steaks and accompaniments. There were to be twelve steaks, each seared both sides and left raw in the middle. They had to be arranged three to each container and the potatoes, individually wrapped in foil, were to be kept warm. There were to be at least two unspecified appetizers. The G-3 has a full galley and the hostess would finish preparing a meal that would make any gourmet chef proud. Shirley related that the hostess was really nervous about the prospect of using an unknown caterer in the middle of Nebraska but she need not have worried.
The airplane arrived McCook Wednesday evening at 6:15 p.m. and departed completely replenished at 6:36 p.m.. Next stop Charleston, S.C.; they made it in two hours-twenty eight minutes. Best part, the hostess later called back to tell Shirley that the men on board wanted to make it known that the steak was the best they'd ever eaten! Not bad for McCook, Neb. Here in southwestern Nebraska we are privileged to eat the best steak in the world and assume that it is common fare. Few of us live like those who can afford to golf the world in a charted private jet but you know I don't think I'd trade places.
It is getting more fun to watch the players in our current political campaign ramp up the promises that each hopes will entice voters to get them elected. The latest is a promise by Sen. Barack Obama to give a tax cut to 95 percent of all taxpayers. That is interesting because at least 40 percent of all "tax payers" actually pay no federal income tax. Now to cut taxes for someone who pays no taxes in the first place is not much of an incentive, so the whole proposal didn't make much sense until I read the fine print. The Democrats are promising to create what they call "refundable tax credits." Translated meaning those who owe no federal income taxes when they file will actually get in return a check taken from the taxes that the rest of us have no choice but pony up to Uncle Sam. Talk about a ripoff!
The whole concept of income redistribution, a sacred obligation of left-leaning Democrats, Socialists and Communists is best exemplified in the Tales of Robin Hood. "Steal from the rich and give to the poor."
Sadly it has worked well in the voting booth since 1932.
That is the way I see it.




Maybe someone just needs to show me how the average American is better off financially when Republicans take charge ... and, by average American, I don't mean oil tycoons and fat CEOs.
yes i would be in favor of that. I will recieve no inheritance and I will more then likley have none to give.
If I want water, I go to the well because thats where the water is. If the gevernment needs money they should go to the people that have it.
The capitol comes from loans, not some fat cat rich person. The only reason they get into it is for more tax write offs.
Perhaps you are correct, lets keep soaking the middle and lower class.
then I'm guessing you are in favor of increasing capital gains and inheritance taxes. I bet your heirs would also be in favor of that. Amazing that some will always be in favor of "soaking the rich". Please advise me where you think capital comes from for investing in future business ventures, etc. etc.
There is no "class warfare". The middle class and the poor have no weapons aginst the powerful wealthy in this country. Everytime someone wants to increase taxes on the wealthy few they start screaming "class warfare". I'd vote for obama just to try to get universal health care.
well Abe, I'm guessing you are a proponent of "class warfare". I am interested in capital gains and inheritance taxes; guess who wants yours to increase.
He didn't mention that John McCain's tax plan would not only help pad the pockets of the wealthiest Americans, but is projected to increase the national debt by more than $1.5 trillion over Barack Obama's plan in 10 years -- some more of the GOP's "fiscal conservatism" at work. It's pretty simple -- only those who make more than $200,000 per year can say, "Obama wants to raise my taxes." If taxes are the issue, the great majority of Gazette subscribers would certainly be much better off under Obama's plan.
(The whole concept of income redistribution, a sacred obligation of left-leaning Democrats, Socialists and Communists is best exemplified in the Tales of Robin Hood. "Steal from the rich and give to the poor.")
Before the 'poor' is given to, however, much 'pork' must be paid for (oh excuse me, 'ear-marks' is the new term). Has anyone ever noticed that 'pork' and 'ear-mark' is the same? Ear-marking is the way pigs were identified, maybe still are. Just a thought.
I hope the golfers enjoyed the 'beef.' Now they know: Where's the Beef! (with no '?') ha