Anti- affirmative action signatures collected

Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Paid petitioner Tyrone Jones of Texas looks over legal requirements concerning collecting signatures at a local restaurant Monday evening.

By LORRI SUGHROUE

City Editor

A controversial anti-affirmative action petition drive made its way to McCook this week, as paid petitioners knocked on doors and milled around public places collecting signatures.

The petition, conducted by the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative in Lincoln, seeks to place a proposed constitutional amendment before voters in November that will prohibit all consideration of race, ethnicity and gender in hiring, scholarship or contracting decisions made by public agencies.

Petitioners have until July 5 to collect the 115,000 valid signatures needed to put the issue on the ballot.

The Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative is the Nebraska branch of The American Civil Rights Initiative, backed by Californian businessman Ward Connerly, a long-time critic of affirmative action programs. The group has been successful in California, Washington and Michigan.

Opponents of the petition, Nebraskans United, say petition circulators are using deceptive tactics in collecting signatures, by asking citizens if they would like to sign a petition that ends discrimination.

Nebraskans United has launched radio and newspaper ads denouncing the petition.

According to the Web site nebraskansunited.org, the petition is being bankrolled by outside interest groups who want to change the Nebraska Constitution for the worse.

If successful, the ban on affirmative action would harm women and minorities programs, such as breast cancer screening and domestic violence and that University of Nebraska students would be denied gender and race-specific scholarships, opponents say.

The Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative refutes those claims.

At its Web site, www.NebraskaCRI.org, it says affirmative action for certain economic and geographic groups would still be permitted -- such as the University of Nebraska still being able to give scholarships based on income and recruit students from specific parts of the state.

Paid petitioner Tyrone Jones of Houston, stopped at a local restaurant Monday night in between collecting signatures and said he agreed with the petition.

"The best qualified person should be hired for the job," he said. "It should make no difference whether you're black or white, male or female. There's two sides to every story."

Jones said he's been in Nebraska for three months, visited all 93 counties and missed 12 tornadoes

"This Nebraska weather is crazy," he said and added that his group would be leaving the area today.

Comments
View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • What part of the Constitution would the 'amendment' change? I know of no place in Federal, or State Constitutions that requires the mentioned considerations. Yes, we have had 'laws' placed into effect that forces us to consider everything but ability, or the wants and needs of the person providing an opportunity. If they want to change, or nullify, a certain law that restricts or takes away freedom, go for it, and petition for signatures to just that. Most 'petitions' I have been asked to sign, over the years, usually had an hidden agenda, that comes to light shortly after we are stuck with it.

    I agree, we should hire the 'best qualified,' without being forced to accept inferior ability because of dictates of wrong 'law.'

    What would happen to a scholorship fund, placed by a successful business woman, who wants young women to have a chance? Can a person 'not' do what they want with their own goods or finances? Ponder on the ramifications before signing anything that changes Constitution, please.

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Tue, Jun 24, 2008, at 9:18 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: