McCook Community Foundation
Login | Register
Overcast ~ 57°F  
[McCook Daily Gazette]
McCook, Nebraska ~ Sunday, September 7, 2008
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (3)

Christensen: Override doubtful

Thursday, April 3, 2008

There may not be enough votes to override Gov. Dave Heineman's veto of a increased gas tax that lawmakers approved in the state budget, said Sen. Mark Christensen of Imperial.

Christensen said he voted in the increase, that would raise fuel prices about a penny per gallon, because he believed in a self-funding system -- where those who use the roads pay for the costs -- and that the increase would help fund roads in western Nebraska.

"If we don't use the tax increase, it's Western Nebraska which will have decreasing road quality," he maintained at the McCook Chamber of Commerce Legislative Conference call this morning.

A self-funding system would be preferable than using cash reserves this year, he said, because if it's a tough financial year next year, real cuts would have to made. These would most likely come from the budgets of the University of Nebraska and the K-12 school system, he said.

"If there's a shortfall in the budget, the schools are hit," he said.

Heineman has vetoed the measure, saying now is not the time to raise fuel prices, with consumers coping with rising costs in food and other areas.

Another bill proposed by Sen. Deb Fischer of Valentine would change the way fuel taxes are levied and collected and would add another 3.3 cents per gallon.

Christensen said he opposed tax increases in general but stood by his assertion that this increase would benefit his district in the long run. Still, he welcomed opinions from his district concerning the fuel taxes.

"Let me know your position, I haven't had much input on this," he said.

Christensen also briefly discussed LB245, advanced on first round, which would require the fluoridation of human drinking water supply in any city or village with a population of 1,000 people or more. The proposed law includes a opt-out clause by a voter initiative before Jan. 1, 2009.

McCook already has enough naturally occurring fluoride in its water supply to meet standards, said City Manager Kurt Fritsch, but Christensen was unclear of how other area towns in his district would fare, such as Cambridge or Arapahoe.

He said he voted against the bill and explained that "I get nervous about another unfunded mandate."

Other issues he addressed included:

* One of his bills he introduced earlier session, LB 990, has been rolled into another bill, LB 1153. Christensen's bill would allow Special Ed students to participate in graduation ceremonies and receive a certificate of participation, then be able to continue school until they turn 21. About 95-99 percent of schools already voluntarily do this, he said.

* The State Fair will be moving to Grand Island, thanks to $21 million coming from University of Nebraska, $5 million from the state cash reserve, $7 million from the State Fair fund and about $8 million from Grand Island.

* LB 1157, that establishes a state-wide testing system to assess student learning, to replace the current method designed by districts, is now on final reading and is predicted to pass, he said. What happens once it leaves the Legislature is anybody's guess, Christensen added, regarding what kind of testing will be adopted.

A local testing system, developed by Paul Ekberg of Southwest Nebraska and being used by 96 districts in the state, is being floated as a possible method, he said, instead of using state dollars to pay for a test developed elsewhere.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable.

Thanks Senator Christensen! We appreciate all your efforts to assist our SW Nebraska schools in meeting the LB1157 requirements. Mark has seen the value in a Computer-based system and become a very "quick study" in this matter. For a "newbie" he has commanded a respectful audience with the long-time Senators. Online has stated many times, if our students are to be evaluated with a one-time paper/pencil test, our schools will not be measured accurately. Thanks Senator for your dedication to SW educators.

-- Posted by Online on Fri, Apr 4, 2008, at 3:38 PM

Professionals Urge End to Water Fluoridation

In a statement first released August 9, 2007, over 1,600 professionals urge Congress to stop water fluoridation until Congressional hearings are conducted. They cite new scientific evidence that fluoridation, long promoted to fight tooth decay, is ineffective and has serious health risks. (http://www.fluorideaction.org/statement.august.2007.html)

Signers include a Nobel Prize winner, three members of the prestigious 2006 National Research Council (NRC) panel that reported on fluoride's toxicology, two officers in the Union representing professionals at EPA headquarters, the President of the International Society of Doctors for the Environment, and hundreds of medical, dental, academic, scientific and environmental professionals, worldwide.

Signer Dr. Arvid Carlsson, winner of the 2000 Nobel Prize for Medicine, says, "Fluoridation is against all principles of modern pharmacology. It's really obsolete."

An Online Action Petition to Congress in support of the Professionals' Statement is available on FAN's web site, http://congress.fluorideaction.net

"The NRC report dramatically changed scientific understanding of fluoride's health risks," says Paul Connett, PhD, Executive Director, Fluoride Action Network. "Government officials who continue to promote fluoridation must testify under oath as to why they are ignoring the powerful evidence of harm in the NRC report," he added.

The Professionals' Statement also references:

-- The new American Dental Association policy recommending infant formula NOT be prepared with fluoridated water.

-- The CDC's concession that the predominant benefit of fluoride is topical not systemic.

-- CDC data showing that dental fluorosis, caused by fluoride over-exposure, now impacts one third of American children.

-- Major research indicating little difference in decay rates between fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities.

-- A Harvard study indicating a possible link between fluoridation and bone cancer.

-- The silicofluoride chemicals used for fluoridation are contaminated industrial waste and have never been FDA- approved for human ingestion.

The Environmental Working Group (EWG), a DC watchdog, revealed that a Harvard professor concealed the fluoridation/bone cancer connection for three years. EWG President Ken Cook states, "It is time for the US to recognize that fluoridation has serious risks that far outweigh any minor benefits, and unlike many other environmental issues, it's as easy to end as turning off a valve at the water plant."

Further, researchers reporting in the Oct 6 2007 British Medical Journal indicate that fluoridation, touted as a safe cavity preventive, never was proven safe or effective and may be unethical. (1)

Many communities rejected or stopped fluoridation over the years. See: http://www.fluoridealert.org/communities...

SOURCE: Fluoride Action Network http://www.FluorideAction.Net

References:

(1) "Adding fluoride to water supplies," British Medical Journal, KK Cheng, Iain Chalmers, Trevor A. Sheldon, October 6, 2007

-- Posted by nyscof on Fri, Apr 4, 2008, at 8:03 AM

Sure...go ahead and tax us some more! It's bad enough the gas prices are so high that we can't afford to drive two vehicles into town. Our children have to sacrifice their activities because it's too expensive to drive to town for them. No honey, we can't afford to go on a vacation this year because of the gas prices. Go ahead and tax us some more...increase the gas prices just a penny more...WHERE WILL THIS END! I commend the Gov. for vetoing this tax. Good for him! The State (just like individuals) needs to learn how to budget more effectively and learn where they need to cut back and reallocate. IT'S CALLED BUDGET AND SACRIFICE!

-- Posted by Rural Citizen on Thu, Apr 3, 2008, at 1:18 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Mailing list
Enter your email address to join our daily headline mailing list:
Video Kingdom