McCook Community Foundation
Login | Register
Fair ~ 85°F  
[McCook Daily Gazette]
McCook, Nebraska ~ Friday, August 29, 2008
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (5)

Online testing won't be part of statewide system

Thursday, March 27, 2008

An online testing system used by students in Southwest Nebraska would be the ideal way to achieve statewide student assessments, according to Dist. 44 Sen. Mark Christensen.

Unfortunately, there are enough votes in the Legislature for LB1157 to go through without it, he said.

The bill, sponsored by Sen. Ron Raikes and which Christensen has voted against, would mandate a statewide system of testing instead of the current method of districts coming up with their own testing.

LB1157 would amend the Quality Education Accountability Act that would include testing in grades three through eight and one grade in high school and also a statement of purpose that the system would "comply with federal assessment and accountability requirements."

According to Christensen, an online testing system developed by Paul Ekberg, technology adviser to Chase County schools, is being used by 96 schools, from Class A to Class D schools, such as North Platte, McCook, Cambridge and Chase County. An in-state provider of a testing model would be preferable than using one from another state, he said, adding that Sen. Raikes seemed surprised about the number of schools using Ekberg's online testing.

But to Christensen, the concept was a no-brainer.

"If it's working, why re-invent the wheel?" Christensen said. In discussions with teachers and superintendents in his district about a state-wide testing, he's found that "Teachers don't want another written test."

Although he said he understands how uniform tests can be beneficial, some schools can appear to perform poorly if other factors such as poverty aren't taken into account. In addition, Christensen said he would like to see an amendment that would create a committee of teachers for input on statewide testing.

In another school bill, Christensen said LB988, also introduced by Raikes, would change the structure of formula needs for school districts and would be back before the Legislature later today.

The bill would base school district budget authority on a new needs calculation that would compare school districts of similar size to determine a basic funding level.

This bill, if approved on final reading, would not affect the McCook School so much, Christensen said, as it would lower the expected increase in state aid. But schools in smaller, sparsely-populated areas such as Chase County, Benkelman and Hayes Center, along with a school district in Omaha, may lose a significant amount of state aid, he said.

The senator said he's been working behind the scenes and "digging into" the issues to see if the bill is fair for students in every school and believes that he will ultimately vote against it.

"I can't see voting against my district," he said.

The bill does include an amendment calling for a 95 percent stabilization to allow smaller schools to plan for the decrease. Final reading of the bill will occur sometime after Friday, he said.

Christensen weighed in on other issues, including:

* The location of the State Fair is still in limbo, as the matter has not moved out of committee yet. An agreement is still needed between the University of Nebraska and the State Fair Board but no definite location, whether Grand Island, Lincoln or elsewhere, has been determined yet.

* a new tax on gasoline, based on price and not amount sold, was approved on first round approval and would raise costs to 4.5 cents per gallon and garner the Roads Department about $30 million. Christensen the increase would be used for maintenance on state roads but not allow for new road construction.

* the vacancy left by the recent resignation of Ann Bleed, Director of the Department of Natural Resources will be difficult to fill unless the pay is increased significantly, Christensen said. It will be difficult to find an engineer to take the job and the responsibility it entails at the current salary of $109,000. The job requires a person with good public relation skills, he said, as the individual would have to be able to work with natural resources districts, irrigation districts, the legislature and the State of Kansas. Chrisensen had no word when the position would be filled.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable.

With all due respect, Dennis, no tests "increase student achievements". Tests simply measure student achievement. It seems to me that if test scores are available to teachers sooner and more frequently, it will help them do their jobs better. The saying goes "you can't manage what you don't measure." And what's wrong with a SW Nebraska enterprise making a million a year? That figure would be gross and I'm sure they have some considerable expenses involved in maintaining the STARS system? Better that investment go to a Nebraska firm than to pay an outside firm. I may be ignorant, but your arguments don't really hold up.

-- Posted by cowgurl1 on Tue, Apr 1, 2008, at 10:04 AM

Again, where is the outside documentation that the current STARS/online system has increased student achievement? Also does anyone know that if Mr. Eckberg has 96 schools and they all pay him between 10 and 20 thousand a year does that business really rack-up of a million dollars each and every year?

-- Posted by dennis on Mon, Mar 31, 2008, at 9:59 AM

LB1157 will pass! These questions exist: Do we want our students to be tested with a one-time 100 question paper/pencil test, with no immediate feedback to teachers/students and possess no opportunity for a retake? Or do we want them to test very close after initial instruction, have instant feedback for teachers/students so they can prepare for a retake, and is computer based? This decision isn't based on money, it is based on what is best for student learning. If the test is paper/pencil or computer-based there will be no cost to school districts. The computer-based system will be more cost and time effective then a time consuming hand tested and hand scored paper tests. It doesn't take a "rocket surgeon" to figure that one out!

-- Posted by Online on Mon, Mar 31, 2008, at 5:54 AM

I understand that Mr. Eckberg will lose tens of thousands of dollars if LB1157 is passed. Despite, Online's comments I would note that there is no documentation, other than STARS itself, that shows that Nebraska students are actually achieving more because of the tests. Our state has dumped millions of dollars into this project. Local districts say they spend between 10 and 20 thousand a year on the system plus the loss of teachers teaching time and loss of learning time because kids are testing. I am sorry if adults may lose their income but the focus should be on student achievement and fiscal responsibility of the NDE and local schools

-- Posted by dennis on Fri, Mar 28, 2008, at 10:35 AM

As a famous ESPN commenter states: "Not so Fast, My Friends". LB1157 might come to the floor on Friday. Even if it fails, Nebraska will have a State Test (LB953, last year)! Teachers need a mechanism to assess their students that is in the 21st(22nd?) century. A "Paper/Pencil" test given one time in the Spring, yeah right! Our students demand more than this and deserve immediate feedback via computer grading. Our teachers want to teach to the "needs of our students" and require immediate feedback, along with data to determine who needs a learner center approach. Why can't they have a second chance? I know of no job that evaluates you on a one-time situation and has no chance for improvement. Our State Legislators understand this and will require our Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) to provide these services. Nebraska State Legislature provides the directions through laws and our NDE is mandated to develop the "nuts and bolts" of the mechanism. If you want a say, write Senator Christensen or others(nebraskalegislature.gov) and reinforce their position on LB1157. It is time for our citizens to stand up and show we are innovators and no sheep in the State testing process.

-- Posted by Online on Thu, Mar 27, 2008, at 7:35 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Mailing list
Enter your email address to join our daily headline mailing list:
Kool Honda