Major changes expected if new state tests enacted

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Nebraska lawmakers' passage of LB1157 would change everything about the way Nebraska schools assess how well their students are learning and progressing.

Gayle Sharkey, McCook Public Schools' curriculum director, told school board members at their monthly meeting March 10 that LB 1157's passage in its final form and approval by Gov. Dave Heineman would require state tests of students' achievement.

Sharkey said state tests might be given once a school year, replacing, in McCook specifically, consortium-developed tests that are given throughout the school year and that allow teachers the opportunity to determine what, if anything, needs to be re-taught and retested. A one-time state test will eliminate the opportunity to re-teach and retest, Sharkey said.

A state test will eliminate STARS -- "School-based, Teacher-led, Assessment and Reporting System -- although the state test system will include what works from STARS. STARS will be phased out, Sharkey said, as will the peer review of each school's assessment process.

Supporters of a state test contend that it will save instructional time and broaden instruction, that it will level comparisons among schools and save money. Opponents believe that a state test will discriminate against small and/or disadvantaged school districts, and that it will narrow instruction as teachers may tend to teach only to the standards. Education money will also have to be spent to develop the state tests, Sharkey said.

Supporters believe that a state test will allow comparisons among states, while opponents point out that states will still be comparing "a patchwork" as states have different tests.

There are national standards and national tests, set by Ministries of Education, in most developed countries. Sharkey said. Other sets of standards include:

* Global standards -- To make comparisons among countries.

* Content Group Standards -- Set by organizations such as the National Council of TEachers of Mathematics (NCTM) and National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS).

* Professional standards -- Written by professional organizations to establish credentials.

* 21st Century Skills Standards -- Based on content knowledge as well as the skills to deal with complex problems of today.

On Feb. 27, after discussion by the Legislature's Education Committee, LB 1157 was placed on General File, the first stage at which a bill and its amendments, if any, are considered by the full Legislature.

On March 4, LB 1157 was advanced to Enrollment and Review Initial (for review after its advancement from General File), and on March 5, was placed on Select File and discussed again by the entire Legislature. Bills on Select File may be amended, returned to committee, indefinitely postponed or advanced to Final Reading. At Final Reading, the entire bill is read (or the reading is waived) and senators, without debate, vote for or against sending the bill to the governor for his signature.

On March 17, an amendment to LB 1157 was adopted on a 29-0 vote. This amendment which would require that a school administrator and a teacher join legislators on an advisory committee; that if no statewide math assessment is administered in 2009-2010, that school districts report assessment results in the same manner as reporting was done in 2008-2009; and that the Nebraska Department of Education can determine appropriate accommodations for assessment of students with disabilities or any student receiving special education programs and services.

Legislators did not advance LB 1157 by the time they adjourned Monday. There are two pending items:

* Senator Annette Dubas filed an amendment to require the statewide assessment for reading and math to include grades 4, 6 and 8 and one grade in high school. The bill currently requires the assessments to occur in grades three through eight, and one grade in high school.

* Sen. Cap Dierks has filed a motion to indefinitely postpone (kill) the bill.

It is not known when legislators will resume second-round debate of LB 1157.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Maybe it might make the teachers more accountable with what they are teaching. Pay more attention to the students instead of "leaving them behind" and only focusing on the children who succeed.

    -- Posted by FNLYHOME on Tue, Mar 18, 2008, at 1:15 PM
  • As you well know, Nebraska is required to have ALL of our students meet the Math and Reading standards by 2014. If we combine the STAR and Statewide-Tests this can be accomplished. But with a state test only, this is impossible. Remember making patterns on the achievement test (NRTs) answer sheets? I feel we should leave LB653 in place and allow NDE to do their thing. Teachers must assess students throughout the year and place grades on report cards. Rule 10 states we MUST teach and assess all state standards. They still have to test their students locally. Therefore, let's use the data to supplement our state test. I feel you would receive a more realistic view of student learning. Senators are wrong about the time required to do STARs. Our online consortia requires one day per year per tested area (Math, RWSL, SS and Science). No more is needed if schools are efficient with their time. We have already spent $25 Million to put this in place and perfect the process. Since NDE requires all assessments to meet 6 criteria and have completed onsite visits for Math and RWSL, WE can compare apples to apples. I would like to see LB1157 killed and let LB653 be implemented as is by the NDE. They know education!

    -- Posted by Online on Tue, Mar 18, 2008, at 4:17 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: