The first, Diane L. Rich, of Cambridge, is charged with embezzling approximately $58,000 on or about Jan. 4, 2004, through on or about July 21, 2006, from the Rural Housing Service, a program of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The maximum possible penalty if convicted, includes imprisonment of 30 years, a $1,000,000 fine, a 5 year term of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment.
(Advertisement)
|
The maximum possible penalty if convicted, includes imprisonment of 10 years, a fine of $250,000, followed by 3 years of supervised release and a $100 special assessment. Count II of the indictment charges that on or about June 26, 2007, through on or about November 21, 2007, Wilson stole United States Postal Service Money Orders. The maximum possible penalty, includes imprisonment of 5 years, a fine of $250,000, followed by 3 years of supervised release and a $100 special assessment.
Indictments are charging documents that contain one or more individual counts that are merely accusations, and every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.







If these women are guilty, I sincerely hope that they are justly punished. It seems that embezzlement lately is something you see happening more and more often. If these "white collar" crimes are properly handled by prosecution maybe this can stem the tide of future embezzlers out there. This really is no different than a burglar entering your home and stealing you blind.
The problem with these women is that IF they did this, they did it all wrong. If they would have just quit their jobs and gone on welfare, the government would have given them everything thing they'd ever want or need...legally. Unfortunately now they may have to go to jail IF found guilty. If they would have just asked the government, they'd be free women.
Yes, please, let's presume them innocent even though we all know they are guilty.