For Your Consideration

Posted Friday, October 21, 2011, at 8:35 AM
View 11 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I have had numerous emails that made sense, however it is easy to ***** and complane about things, and then hit the return key to send it on to all our constituents . This will not work, you have to take it to the streets and be heard by hundreds of thousands. Lets face it, we are either to busy with our everyday life or we can't do it because we work, or we are just sheep. My opinion

    -- Posted by Keda46 on Sat, Oct 22, 2011, at 3:15 PM
  • wont work because you cant get enough people to stand together. everyone elses congressman is a (insert whatever perjorative), but my congressman does a great job. Let us not forget the pork (ooooops, I mean "earmark").

    -- Posted by doodle bug on Sat, Oct 22, 2011, at 4:24 PM
  • *

    Too bad you don't think it would work Keda46 and DB. I just read a survey that 57% of those surveyed in an AP poll say the government needs changing... seems like the time for something like this is now.

    It's amazing to me that the political bloggers at the Gazette get hundreds of comments on their opinions seldom offering anything other than finger pointing at their "opponents", and all the response this blog gets is two folks saying it will not work because people are lazy.

    I guess we Americans are apathetic, lazy, and will get what we deserve. Makes me sick!

    -- Posted by Brian Hoag on Mon, Oct 24, 2011, at 11:11 AM
  • and congress has a less than 20% approval rating, but we keep sending the same (another expletive) to Washington. I am of the opinion they are only interested in re-election, not what is correct for the country. And I do vote! lol

    -- Posted by doodle bug on Mon, Oct 24, 2011, at 12:37 PM
  • *

    Sounds like a great idea, Brian.

    I saw an idea proposed that we reduce Congressional pay by the percent they spend in excess of revenues! Like this year, they overspend our revenues by 40% so their salary is cut by 40%.

    Corporations have had performance based pay for years. But they don't get to set their own pay.

    -- Posted by Boomer62 on Mon, Oct 24, 2011, at 4:59 PM
  • I guess we Americans are apathetic, lazy, and will get what we deserve. Makes me sick. Couldn't have said it any better myself. Sorry Brian, didn't intend to sound like such a pessimist. Get the ball rolling, let me know how that works out for you in five years.

    -- Posted by Keda46 on Mon, Oct 24, 2011, at 8:19 PM
  • Doodle,

    You do make a good point. However, I think if there is at least one thing everyone can agree on (even on this board!) it's that our government is doing a pretty poor job governing and has been for some time. The how's and why's may be irrevocably lost in the maw of talking points and partisanship, but if there is anything you might get a bunch of Americans to agree on, a way to replace all of congress at once (without M-4's) may be one.


    I am persuaded by behavioral economists who argue that people respond to incentives. This point surely isn't lost on Warren Buffet who has (arguably of course) the best working knowledge of the market on Earth. This idea is simply a way to incentivize the lowering of the deficit.

    No reason to think it wouldn't work. Given, as Doodle points out, you can muster the man/woman power to give it the teeth of a constitutional amendment.

    -- Posted by Benevolus on Mon, Oct 24, 2011, at 10:46 PM
  • I have always wondered if a term limit is warranted for the Presidency, why is it not also warranted for congress? I am one of those dummies who think term limits might have a positive effect on government. Staggered limits of course, not everyone every election cycle.

    -- Posted by doodle bug on Tue, Oct 25, 2011, at 10:26 AM
  • When a person is running for election, first time up, we need consider their promises on what they will do. OK, First time, Only Time!! From that point, on, we vote based on what they did, that they said they would do. If they didn't, we don't, re-elect.

    If, 'We the People' would only do that, eventually we would be trying to keep people in office, rather than them retiring, because only the Good-Guy could survive our vote. But, sadly, we don't do our job, and that emboldens our elected officials to not feel the need to do theirs.

    I am finding fault, but I'm looking in the mirror at the worst of the lot, me thinks. Try it, you'll hate it. (Pun). (^8

    There is only one person, I know of, too old and wimpy, to do anything about the problem, ME. So I leave it to the rest of you, to save ME, first, then yourselves. How American is that??

    My solution would be to restrict spending to 90% of revenue (which includes debt eradication), and invest the remaining 10% into an acceptable reserve, for catastrophic events. No more debt!! How impossible is that??

    Oh, and Regulate the Stock Market, in a way, no one can sell a company stock that they have purchased any stock in, for six months. Thus, knocking out the money ""Game,"" which has a crippling affect on the economy, daily.

    I'm done.

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Tue, Oct 25, 2011, at 1:20 PM
  • Navyblue wrote, 'When a person is running for election, first time up, we need consider their promises on what they will do".

    Well! in the words of Mearle Haggard, When a President goes through the White House door, An' does what he says he'll do.

    We'll all be drinkin' free bubble-up, Eatin' that rainbow stew.

    -- Posted by Keda46 on Wed, Oct 26, 2011, at 7:52 PM
  • Brian,

    I would be willing to give this a shot.


    -- Posted by wallismarsh on Wed, Oct 26, 2011, at 8:38 PM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: