[mccookgazette.com] Fair ~ 80°F  
High: 78°F
Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2017


Posted Monday, February 16, 2009, at 10:31 AM

Designated Driver?
A story out of New York caught my attention and I want to share. A man was arrested in Long Island New York's Suffolk County for DUI according to an AP report. Now a DUI bust isn't that unusual unfortunately, but the rest of the story is what I found compelling.

You see... this particular driver was convicted of DUI previously and had a breath alcohol device installed in his car to keep him from driving drunk. Unfortunately his latest arrest for DUI found him behind the wheel of a rental vehicle crashed into a utility pole.

On one hand, we don't have information about where the driver lives so he may have been traveling, or perhaps his personal vehicle was being repaired and the rental was a temporary replacement.

On the other hand, Mr Smith may be guilty of premeditated DUI. Did he rent because he was unable to get his starter controlled car running? Did he know he was going drinking and rented a car so he could get home??

Now I've never heard of premeditated DUI, but I also imagine that there is some law to cover the trangression. The way things often work in a situation like this is that the guy goes to jail, and another law is made to make this type behavior more punishable.

You can read the original story at... http://www.syracuse.com/newsflash/index....

Showing comments in chronological order
[Show most recent comments first]

Unfortunately there is probably not a law that covers this sort of behavior. If the drunk driving laws in this country were any where near tough enough, there wouldnt have to be. If you think about it, all drunk driving is premeditated. Everyone that has a drivers license knows that it is against the law to drive drunk, they know what the legal limit is, and they know about how much is too much, all of this information is in the drivers licensing book and several questions pertaining to this subject are on the drivers test.

When a driver gets behind the wheel of a car after drinking, they know they have been drinking, and they know it may be possible to test over the limit. They will use the excuse that they are not over thier personal limit, or that the testing machine is wrong, there is a limitless number of excuses. The fact is that your body will process 1 oz. of alcohol per hour, nothing will speed this up. It doesnt matter how big you are, how experienced you are at drinking, or how well you hold your alcohol.

If you cant find a ride home from the bar, maybe you shouldnt have been there in the first place. I know a lot of heavy drinkers, they drink, they have fun, they get crazy, but they dont drive even if they have to walk. I think 1st offense drunk driving should yeild at least 6 months in jail mandatory and loss of license for 1 year. If they do it again, ther is no reason to ever give thier license back.

-- Posted by seentoomuch on Mon, Feb 16, 2009, at 12:39 PM

I won't comment about motorcycle helmet use, but I will make a brief comment about tobacco use.

Tobacco was the number 1 cause of death in 2000 with 435,000 deaths. Alcohol deaths for the same time frame from all causes, not just drunk driving was 85,000. The MADD numbers mentioned are far less.

Now I admit that smoking is an individual choice as is drinking. But statistics show that the least educated and poorest of the population are most likely to smoke. We end up picking up substantial expense, for those that have no health insurance through higher taxes, and insured patients with higher health insurance premiums passed on to everyone.

No doubt we're paying for both vices but I think tobacco likely costs us more in the long run. I sure don't appreciate my expensive health insurance premiums when I know that tobacco use by others is partly to blame.

-- Posted by Brian Hoag on Tue, Feb 17, 2009, at 11:32 AM

Oops... I said that tobacco was the #1 cause of death in 2000 which is incorrect, but the total number is correct.

-- Posted by Brian Hoag on Tue, Feb 17, 2009, at 11:40 AM

I think wearing a motorcycle helmet should be a choice made by the rider. If you make a bad choice, most likely you will only harm yourself. Alcohol and tobacco use has been proven to cause harm to other people that did not make the choice. I dont have a big problem with smokers, I choose not to smoke, and if the smoke of another person is bothering me, I will leave.

We may not always get the chance to get out of the way of a drunk driver, the penalty for drunk driving needs to be much worse than it is now.

-- Posted by seentoomuch on Tue, Feb 17, 2009, at 5:26 PM

Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration:

The City Slickers
Brian Hoag
Recent posts
Blog RSS feed [Feed icon]
Comments RSS feed [Feed icon]
Hot topics
Welcome To The Party Comrade
(0 ~ 10:44 AM, Oct 26)

Sticks & Stones
(1 ~ 8:07 PM, Oct 22)

With Apologies To Dogs...
(0 ~ 2:03 PM, Oct 8)

See the Pope, Quit Your Job
(0 ~ 2:13 PM, Sep 25)

Where I Stand
(5 ~ 9:29 AM, Jun 10)