[mccookgazette.com] Mostly Cloudy ~ 30°F  
High: 50°F ~ Low: 25°F
Sunday, Dec. 21, 2014

Thoughts on Liberty

Posted Monday, February 7, 2011, at 4:46 PM

(Photo)
"Be not intimidated...nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your liberties by any pretense of politeness, delicacy, or decency. These, as they are often used, are but three different names for hypocrisy, chicanery and cowardice." - John Adams

One would have to be blind or stupid to see that in recent days, criticism of our current political establishment has been treated as hate, or racism, or a call to violence.

These are the labels leftists have always used to silence our natural revulsion to the theft of Liberty we are now witnessing on an almost daily basis.

I remind you of the shameful acts of the left in this country after the shootings in Tucson, their repugnant efforts to blame conservatives for the acts of a criminal mind. The evidence thus far clearly shows that the shooter/criminal was much more in line with leftist/pagan points of view than any conservative philosophy.

I would be guilty of the same type of tripe if I blamed the left for the shooter's actions. Each of us is responsible for his own actions, and that is the essence of Liberty.

Reminding us of how Liberty is lost, Thomas Jefferson once said: "We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debt, as that we must be TAXED in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labours and our amusements, for our callings and our creeds, we will have not time to think, no means of calling our miss-managers to account but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers...And this is the tendency of all human governments."

Jefferson continues, "A departures from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for another, till the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery...And the fore-horse of this frightful team is PUBLIC DEBT. Taxation follows that, and in its train, wretchedness and oppression."

Well said sir!

Yesterday, many of us celebrated the birthday of the last GREAT President America had, Ronald Reagan. A man who believed in the American people, a man who trusted American exceptionalism.

My oh my, how far we have fallen in such a short time.

Now we have Barack Obama. A man who is proud to proclaim our faults around the world. A man who believes that America, and thus Americans, must be subdued. A man who bows before dictators and then demands that you and I bow at the alter of government and give allegiance to the loss of Liberty. Barack Obama, a man who acts as though the American people are not capable of managing their own lives.

Reagan once said: "Politics is suppose to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first."

We sure see that today don't we?

I can understand what is going on in Egypt right now. I am leery of what will be the ultimate outcome, but I understand it.

Can you imagine what we would be going through after thirty years of Obama or Carter?

We'd be in the streets alright, if we weren't dead.

Isn't it so clearly odd that Obama hears the voices of those in the streets in Egypt, and yet slanders and maligns those Tea Party Patriots in the streets of the United States?

In the world of Obama, the average man or woman in Egypt is capable of self-government, but we in America are not. Obama tramples on Liberty as he works to control the everyday life of all you "bitter-clingers".

During the next couple of years, Obama's government and the propaganda media are going to lie to you on an everyday basis.

Work hard to cut through the lies of this cesspool administration, and the lies of Katie Couric and her ilk, and seek the truth.

Liberty depends on it.

Every dictator in history began his reign of terror with a so-called concern for the poor, and then worked to create more poor. Today we have over forty million folks in this country on food stamps. How is that possible? It is possible because liberals have worked hard to convince people that they need to take whatever they can get from government god.

As those infamous ladies standing on the streets of liberal-crushed Detroit demonstrated, Liberals have dumbed-down folks into thinking that they are entitled to "Obama's stash".

Gone is their independence. Gone is their Liberty.

They will be forever on the streets, looking for a handout they think they 'deserve'. They have lost the will to care for themselves, and to be responsible for their own actions. Now, they live in a world where everything that happens to them is the fault of someone else.

When you take away a person's right to fail, then you destroy their ability to achieve. It is a God given right to earn your own success or failure. No government has the ability to hand you success. But runaway liberalism can guarantee you failure.

In fact, Liberalism's only guarantees are failure, misery and poverty for all...save a few elites.

In the days ahead, the leftists will do their best to smear those who stand for the Liberty that the Declaration of Independence claimed for all.

Be extra careful in believing anything that comes from the media and government. Do due diligence and seek the truth.

The left will do their very best to intimidate us into silence. We must not be silent. They will try and label us as fear mongers and hate mongers. They will claim offense when we utter the truth. They will claim that we are racists, when it is they that practice racism.

We must speak out. It is our duty as Patriots to stand against those who seek to destroy the very fabric of our country. Do not be moved by the rantings and craziness of Liberals. Anything other then their alledged brilliance will offend them.

Listen to Patrick Henry, "Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly things."

Your very life irritates liberals.

Your very thoughts irritate liberals.

Your unwillingness to submit to government god irritates liberals.

They are already irritated, so why keep silent?

The country you save...may be your own.


Comments
Showing most recent comments first
[Show in chronological order instead]

Damu - admittedly then, your belief system is disbelief. So, you, what...believe in a void from which all matter and life suddenly sprang; and then try to link morality derived solely from your own point of reality which emanates from nothing?

-- Posted by Mickel on Sat, Feb 26, 2011, at 12:15 PM

@Mickel There is no belief in my system, its based on disbelief. I have no magical sky fairies or intricate mythology. You will have to excuse my skepticism of other peoples logical ability when they believe that bearded men in the sky dictate what happens on the ground.

-- Posted by Damu on Fri, Feb 18, 2011, at 6:22 PM

SW...??? I asked you to specifically name a rant that you claimed Sam had espoused...and you liken my question to some bestial equivocation? It may take me awhile to get that one to sink in.

Also, I didn't bring ideology into this debate...I'm re-reading the posts and it looks like you did. Could you at least try to fake being objective? I didn't bring up the question of gay or animal marriage either.

Damu - so what if Sam believes Christianity should be the only religion in the US or the world for that matter...you believe religion is a waste of time, yet you hold your own ideology as dear as Sam holds his. Religious freedom is about the protection of our beliefs and the freedom to exercise our right to worship (or not) in the manner in which we so choose. I don't agree with Voodoo...but I recognize that folks who believe it have the right to practice their faith. You want people to recognize your beliefs...the reciprocation of that recognition is in order.

-- Posted by Mickel on Thu, Feb 17, 2011, at 9:12 PM

@SirD I know facts are difficult things to deal with. Don't worry, with time it becomes easier to change your course. Believe me, I've been there.

-- Posted by Damu on Thu, Feb 17, 2011, at 12:54 PM

Wow! Again Damu! You are showing yourself to be quite the savory individual! I imagine that you are doing as great a job for your causes as mike does for his!

-- Posted by Sir Didymus on Wed, Feb 16, 2011, at 9:07 PM

Damu,

Please refrain from using the r-word.

-- Posted by SWNebr Transplant on Tue, Feb 15, 2011, at 2:02 PM

@Keda64 Your sentiments are in the right place. Your somewhat wrong on the religious portion though. The large portion of Christians in this nation effects people in a multitude of ways.

From electing oblivious retards to high office. To continuing the fight against equality for people with differing ideals from themselves.

-- Posted by Damu on Tue, Feb 15, 2011, at 8:40 AM

I'm neither republican or a closet queen, I'm just an older man that is somewhat set in my ways. Your right, if its consenting then what business is it of mine. If someone wants to marry there mother or father, sister or brother and its ok with them, it's none of my concern. I just can't help taking jabs once in awhile, sort of like you and the religious thing. Its none of your concern how people feel religiously, but that doesn't keep you from pissing on there parade.

-- Posted by Keda46 on Tue, Feb 15, 2011, at 1:04 AM

If the republican party is any indication, your much more likely to be a closeted (Fill in the blank with whatever you want) speaking out against something you disagree with, than speaking for it.

-- Posted by Damu on Mon, Feb 14, 2011, at 9:22 PM

@keda64 Lets make the question a bit more "spicy". If whatever act is done between two consenting adults, or a consenting adult and animal. What business is it of anyone else's?

I personally don't care if people are out bangin animals. Thats their prerogative. I also don't care if people are out with members of the same gender. Why would anyone?

-- Posted by Damu on Mon, Feb 14, 2011, at 7:02 PM

@Keda64 Fair enough. If what someone else is doing, doesn't effect you, and doesn't hurt anyone. Why would you care?

-- Posted by Damu on Mon, Feb 14, 2011, at 6:58 PM

Gosh! I don't know, you mean, like child molestation, or kill someone? It's not effecting me directly. If I may suggest, ask better questions.

-- Posted by Keda46 on Mon, Feb 14, 2011, at 6:23 PM

Why would anyone care what someone else is doing if it didn't directly effect them? I simply don't understand why anyone would care.

-- Posted by Damu on Mon, Feb 14, 2011, at 4:53 PM

LOL

For your sake, I hope she doesn't either.

-- Posted by Keda46 on Mon, Feb 14, 2011, at 4:00 PM

Keda,

According to Mickel's criterion there is no reason why I can't marry an animal, it doesn't say so in the constitution.

P.S. In the spirit of Valentine's day, I really hope my wife doesn't read this and think I consider her an animal :)

-- Posted by SWNebr Transplant on Mon, Feb 14, 2011, at 1:15 PM

The same thing could be ask about an animal, should you be able to marry one, if you both truly loved each other, why or why not?

Who knows? As fast as the world is changing, I could see it happening in a few centuries. I may not agree with it, but that hasn't stopped to many things that have changed that I didn't like.

-- Posted by Keda46 on Mon, Feb 14, 2011, at 11:31 AM

Mickel,

If that is your criteria for comparison, I would have to ask you what constitutionally guaranteed liberties are being infringed upon that led to this rant? Where in the constitution does it say we can't have debt?

What constitutionally guaranteed rights is anyone trying to take away, left or right?

If as you say to Damu this is just about differences in opinion or expression, what is wrong with leftists expressing their opinions?

I was merely referring to the problem that all ideologues seem to run into in that it is quite easy to point out the hypocrisy in their beliefs.

I will pose a question, should homosexuals be allowed to marry, why or why not?

-- Posted by SWNebr Transplant on Sun, Feb 13, 2011, at 8:31 PM

@Mickel I would necessarily say joy is the term I would use. Entertainment is much more accurate in terms of definition.

Whatever happened to that debate we had going on. You stopped answering :(.

Now, in regard to the 9/11 mosque. Sams entire argument against it was based on the religious pretexts he believed it was about. I think one could easily construe that Sam feels that Christianity is the only religion that has any place in America. I don't believe Sam would have any problems at all with the rescinding of freedom of religion in regard to Muslims.

-- Posted by Damu on Sun, Feb 13, 2011, at 4:49 PM

SWN...so could you specifically cite some liberties, guarenteed by the Constitution that Sam wants removed? Or, actually, to use your words...What specific guarenteed Constitutional liberties does Sam not agree with that he is ranting about?

Damu...Perhaps you are implying the blog about voicing opposition to the Mosque being built on ground-zero? I can see how poking holes in a Christian on this topic would create joy for you...but I have to tell you that there is no Constitutional amendment concerning church location. That is actually a private matter. However, voicing opposition to where a church is being built IS constitutionally protected. Just because you or somebody else doesn't like the opinion, doesn't make it wrong or invalid.

-- Posted by Mickel on Sun, Feb 13, 2011, at 1:04 PM

@Mickel Simply look at the 9/11 Mosque post from a while back.

-- Posted by Damu on Sat, Feb 12, 2011, at 2:50 PM

Mickel,

If you are referring to my post, I would direct you not to this post but to other posts Sam has made. I didn't mean to imply that he was ranting about liberties he doesn't agree with in this post.

-- Posted by SWNebr Transplant on Sat, Feb 12, 2011, at 1:24 PM

I'm still wondering where in the article Sam was ranting about removing liberties he doesn't agree with.

-- Posted by Mickel on Thu, Feb 10, 2011, at 11:11 PM

@SWNEBR I think your comparing apples to oranges in your example with McVeigh. I personally don't think killing innocents in any instance is justified. I'm just somewhat bewildered when people try to say the reason the middle east has so much anger towards the US is our "freedoms". The lack of knowledge on the publics part to the actions our government has taken over there is bewildering to me.

-- Posted by Damu on Thu, Feb 10, 2011, at 10:01 PM

Thank you gentleman for your perspective on this subject!

-- Posted by Keda46 on Thu, Feb 10, 2011, at 11:34 AM

Damu,

I think you are too generous in your estimation of the people in the middle east. You sound as if you believe the extremists are justified in their anger towards us. That same reasoning could apply to Timothy McVeigh, he felt he was justified in his extremism as well.

-- Posted by SWNebr Transplant on Thu, Feb 10, 2011, at 11:07 AM

@SWNEBR You hit the nail on the head. With the US's history in regard to foreign affairs. It surprises me that people don't understand that regions anger with us.

-- Posted by Damu on Thu, Feb 10, 2011, at 9:16 AM

Keda,

As with Hussein in the 80s or Mubarak or the Saudis, as long as they are our dictators we support them, the only problem comes if they are some one else's dictators.

-- Posted by SWNebr Transplant on Thu, Feb 10, 2011, at 7:41 AM

Speaking of Iraq, I'm asking a question, not arguing a point. How would Saddam Hussein ever have been taken out of power by anyone? The United nations Security Council began sanctions against Iraq, they began August 6, 1990, four days after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, and continued until May 22, 2003, after the fall of Saddam Hussein.

In this period of 12 years plus,"Richard Garfield, a Columbia University nursing professor ... cited the figures 345,000-530,000 for the entire 1990-2002 period" for sanctions-related excess deaths.

Do we just leave dictators alone and hope they go away, or does the first world countries do something about it?

-- Posted by Keda46 on Wed, Feb 9, 2011, at 7:44 PM

I also am not sure if we are loosing liberties, I think that was part of our stated purpose in Iraq, and I disagreed with that statement at the time and still do.

-- Posted by SWNebr Transplant on Tue, Feb 8, 2011, at 9:13 AM

Sam,

It was just your rant I was referring, using their rants as a basis. Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with passion.

Both Obama and you are ideologues in my opinion.

I think you can expand your honest liberal analogy to any ideologues, conservative or liberal.

Actually I would call Patrick Henry a ranter, doesn't mean I don't agree with him.

My point is that when you go on and on about how liberals taking away "liberties" while at the same time supporting the infringement of "liberties" of those you don't agree with you come off as a hypocrite, just as Liberals do.

I believe you have honest reasons that you believe in for your views, but I also believe whacko liberals also have reasons for their beliefs.

The reality of our situation is much bigger than any one sided view explains.

How am I intellectually dishonest? Because I don't agree with you 100%?

I think Jefferson has a valild point, it was not that idea that I was "rebuking petutantly"

-- Posted by SWNebr Transplant on Tue, Feb 8, 2011, at 9:09 AM

SW Trans - I have come to expect a bit more in your responses. Was Jefferson, Adams or Henry ranting? Or was it just me?

Typical? You don't think we are loosing liberties?

Is Obama an ideologue, or just me? I am beginning to suspect that you are intellectually dishonest.

But then again, I have never met an honest liberal, maybe you have. Introduce me to one will you?

Also, was Jefferson correct in his assessment, or is he worthy of your petulant rebuke?

You'd call Patrick Henry a ranter too wouldn't ya?

LOL

-- Posted by sameldridge on Mon, Feb 7, 2011, at 9:18 PM

Corporations should not be people. This should be common sense. Kind of gives you an idea who is pulling the strings on both sides.

-- Posted by Damu on Mon, Feb 7, 2011, at 8:47 PM

everyone in our government does what they accuse the other side of doing. Some are just better at hiding it or lying about it then others.

-- Posted by president obama on Mon, Feb 7, 2011, at 8:37 PM

Sam,

It's always interesting when any ideaologue rants about "liberty". Amazing that you feel justified in decrying "liberals" for taking away "liberties" when you are often ranting in favor of the theft of "liberties" you agree with.

Typical.

-- Posted by SWNebr Transplant on Mon, Feb 7, 2011, at 8:10 PM

And just what is my glass house Dawg?

-- Posted by sameldridge on Mon, Feb 7, 2011, at 7:25 PM

I love conservatives touting what a great man Reagan was.I'm not sure if that is wrought by self delusion, or some other equally idiotic mechanism.

http://www.politicususa.com/en/reagan-th...

I will give the man credit for the desire to abolish nuclear weapons, but he didn't appear to terribly useful in that capacity either.

-- Posted by Damu on Mon, Feb 7, 2011, at 7:00 PM

I just replace the words "left" and "liberal", with the words "right" and "conservative", and it makes for better reading. Those in glass houses should not cast stones.

-- Posted by president obama on Mon, Feb 7, 2011, at 5:29 PM


Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.


Hot topics
Aaaaaarrrgg!
(10 ~ 3:51 PM, Oct 23)

Elizabeth Warren's Eleven Tenants of Moonbattery
(7 ~ 5:23 PM, Sep 1)

The Politics of Divsion
(4 ~ 6:40 PM, Aug 13)

They Are in it Together
(9 ~ 8:47 AM, Aug 6)

The Savage Truth
(3 ~ 10:08 PM, Aug 2)