Cuddle Up and The Bare Facts

Posted Friday, April 30, 2010, at 7:22 PM
Comments
View 10 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    Comrade Loud - your attempt at profound thought is coming off more like a turd in a punch bowl, or malodorous flatulence in Church. Next, you'll be picking your nose and flicking buggers at kids.

    -- Posted by sameldridge on Sat, May 1, 2010, at 9:38 AM
  • Hey loud, since fundin hasn't helped you out, I don't think sams response was humor. Just so your hard drive didn't flutter

    -- Posted by boojum666 on Sat, May 1, 2010, at 2:51 PM
  • Actually the reason a topless (attractive?) woman bring out such an uproar is because of the liberal woman. Liberal women live their lives out of jealousy, or envy. They are especially envious of beautiful or attractive women. It is the liberal woman who believes attractive women climb the corporate ladder because of their attractiveness, or because of it, their sexuality. And let's face it, liberal women tend not to be as attractive, either in appearance or in personality.

    It is a survival thing, strong beautiful women, in appearance and personality, tend to be conservative, even shall we say, Christian, tend to attract strong conservative, Christian men. Their families tend to be larger, happier, and more successful. She knows how to keep her man focused of her and the family.

    The resentful liberal woman will attract emotionally weak men, conservative and liberal, men who they can control. Their men, and their children, tend to be "on guard" at all time as to not offend this unusually cruel creature. Eventually, due to their weakness, the men and children succumb to the god of liberalism, envy. I do believe we see this on these blogs.

    -- Posted by Chunky Peanut Butter on Sat, May 1, 2010, at 6:09 PM
  • "Comrade Loud - your attempt at profound thought is coming off more like a TURD in a punch bowl, or malodorous flatulence in Church. Next, you'll be picking your nose and flicking buggers at kids.

    -- Posted by sameldridge on Sat, May 1, 2010, at 9:38 AM"

    Gearjammer,

    When you choose this level of high road (Through the Lincoln Tunnel of expression) in philosophical debate, you don't need a censor.

    You need a custodian!

    -- Posted by HerndonHank on Sat, May 1, 2010, at 7:23 PM
  • Isn't BWI against the law? Now this is humor loud,just so you don't bust a capacitor

    (blogging while intoxicated) ;)

    -- Posted by boojum666 on Sun, May 2, 2010, at 2:52 PM
  • Liberal or conservative, who cares as long as they don't weigh 200 lbs. Right fellas. Unless you are into that sort of thing, and that's cool, too. Heavy chicks need love. Oh and chunky can you send me a pic, you sound like a pretty hot chick. But only if you are one of these conservative women, that you speak of. I bet Palin is a beast in the sack.

    -- Posted by Platinumtoaster on Mon, May 3, 2010, at 1:54 AM
  • Gearjammer,

    If you or the GAZETTE editors can review the comments on this blog and find any seriously socially redeeming virtues -- Please advise at to which ones and how.

    By the way -- having seen photos of the Boulder maximum-legal-skin couple, it is obvious why the neighbors are complaining.

    Beauty is skin deep -- UGLY IS ALL THE WAY THROUGH.

    -- Posted by HerndonHank on Mon, May 3, 2010, at 11:07 AM
  • *

    "Hmm. I am still just a bit confused as to how no one liked "grammy-mammies.""

    Maybe there just aren't enough grampy's on these boards to appreciate the grammy-mammies.

    -- Posted by SWNebr Transplant on Tue, May 4, 2010, at 11:02 AM
  • So according to our resident liberals, only those they deem as beautiful can be seen in public, or even on their own private property, in the nude, or at least topless. So much for social justice.

    -- Posted by Chunky Peanut Butter on Tue, May 4, 2010, at 5:07 PM
  • GI,

    For the profit seekers out there, possibilities are endless.

    >>Special kneepads for some to prevent bruising of the lower frontal-thighs and knees.

    >> Or as a total preventative for those same ladies, a modified velvet surfaced flexible handcuff to fasten certain pendulous appendages behind the neck when engaged in gardening, or rigorous exercise.

    >> A Sun lotion squeeze dispenser on a neck strap so it is always handy, even when going topless and with only the modest G-String.

    >>Day of the week DayGlo G-Strings or Brazilian dental floss bottoms to qualify for legal necessities in those restrictive communities such as Boulder subsidized public housing.

    The for profit possibilities are limitless, restricted only by how soon your conservative approach to restricting governmental control over American lives can be established.

    Reduce governmental interference:

    Curtail Big Government:

    Let everyone wear sidearms, and grant them the freedom to just shoot anyone who irritates or offends them.

    Restrict criminal trials in such cases to deciding if the deceased offended his or her killer enough to award punitive damages and cost of ammunition from the deceased's estate.

    By doggies, we'll stop this governmental interference with our lives yet!!

    -- Posted by HerndonHank on Tue, May 4, 2010, at 5:35 PM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: