[mccookgazette.com] Fair ~ 18°F  
Feels like: 9°F
Sunday, Feb. 26, 2017

Cuddle Up and The Bare Facts

Posted Friday, April 30, 2010, at 7:22 PM

Cuddle up! If men haven't already been feminized enough to suit you, news from the UK should cheer you up. Scientists may be able to deliver the ultimate in sensative manhood.

Yes indeed ladies, a dream come true. A simple nasal spray will now turn your man into a cuddle bunny.


The good news, (or is it?) for women is a spray, "Just a puff or two of the so-called 'cuddle chemical' and even the most macho of males is as a sensative as a woman."

I guess the Cambridge and German scientists have nothing better to work on then the world wide problem of male insensitivity.

"The findings raises the tantalising possibility that women could use the oxytocin sprays to help macho boyfriends get in touch with their feminine side."

Oh be still my emotional heart!

There's more ...

"Chauvinists could be turned into sensative souls happy to watch weepy films and critique outfits on shopping trips."

Oh the joy!

Guys, if your woman suddenly suggest you try a new health spray or something similar, be careful, or you could be on your way to a long shopping trip for clothes, and carrying a purse, (you know the "European shoulder bag".)

You can't make this stuff up.

The Bare Facts.

In Boulder Colorado a fifty-two year old woman apparently now has a "right" to garden in her yard topless, at her taxpayer subsidized housing.

Aren't the taxpayers nice?


"Catharine Pierce, 52, caused a stir last month when she tended to her garden down the street from a school and in front a a busy road wearing only a yellow thong and pink gloves."

Oh how nice.

The Boulder Housing Partners (taxpayers) "previously threatened to evict the couple becuase of their nudist ways" and because "Robert and Catharine Pierce have caused neighbors and passers-by to complain and call police about their nearly naked bodies."

Other articles in the Daily Camera confirm that this subsidized housing is indeed located down from a school, in a neighborhood with lots of children, and across the street from a park.

Some neighbors have threatened to move. ,

Perhaps if this goofy couple in their fifties worked harder, and ran around with no clothes on less, they could afford their own housing, with a tall fence, and get naked outside all they want.

The offended neighbors are handling this all wrong. What they need to do is this - drag out lots of lawn chairs and set them up for an audience to watch the free-spirited little nudist as she gardens in her thong and pink gloves.

Have ice-tea and lemonade ready.

Some neighbors have said there are teenage boys in the neighborhood - well super duper! Since there is a park just across the street, there would be plenty of room for young men and boys to sit and watch Mrs Pierce and she works away.

They may even learn a little bit about gardening.

If you click onto the article at the Boulder Daily Camera, you'll see this brave couple's picture with tape over their mouths.

You have to understand how nutty liberals think.

Here is a couple, enjoying the benefits of generous taxpayers, in a nice home, across from a park, close to schools, but they consider themselves as victims.

Not too long ago, a dozen or so women in Portland, Maine decided to take off their tops and parade downtown to demand that women be able to be topless like men.

They got attention, a lot of attention. Then some of these topless wonders got mad that men were gawking at their breasts. Well ladies, I got to tell you, speaking as just another guy, if you got them out, we are gonna look at 'em. Got it!

If you gals want to round around topless, go ahead. But men are going to look. The problem with nudists is this simple truth. Most often, the folks that want to parade around in the buff, are the last folks you want to see nude.

Showing comments in chronological order
[Show most recent comments first]

Comrade Loud - your attempt at profound thought is coming off more like a turd in a punch bowl, or malodorous flatulence in Church. Next, you'll be picking your nose and flicking buggers at kids.

-- Posted by sameldridge on Sat, May 1, 2010, at 9:38 AM

Hey loud, since fundin hasn't helped you out, I don't think sams response was humor. Just so your hard drive didn't flutter

-- Posted by boojum666 on Sat, May 1, 2010, at 2:51 PM

Actually the reason a topless (attractive?) woman bring out such an uproar is because of the liberal woman. Liberal women live their lives out of jealousy, or envy. They are especially envious of beautiful or attractive women. It is the liberal woman who believes attractive women climb the corporate ladder because of their attractiveness, or because of it, their sexuality. And let's face it, liberal women tend not to be as attractive, either in appearance or in personality.

It is a survival thing, strong beautiful women, in appearance and personality, tend to be conservative, even shall we say, Christian, tend to attract strong conservative, Christian men. Their families tend to be larger, happier, and more successful. She knows how to keep her man focused of her and the family.

The resentful liberal woman will attract emotionally weak men, conservative and liberal, men who they can control. Their men, and their children, tend to be "on guard" at all time as to not offend this unusually cruel creature. Eventually, due to their weakness, the men and children succumb to the god of liberalism, envy. I do believe we see this on these blogs.

-- Posted by Chunky Peanut Butter on Sat, May 1, 2010, at 6:09 PM

"Comrade Loud - your attempt at profound thought is coming off more like a TURD in a punch bowl, or malodorous flatulence in Church. Next, you'll be picking your nose and flicking buggers at kids.

-- Posted by sameldridge on Sat, May 1, 2010, at 9:38 AM"


When you choose this level of high road (Through the Lincoln Tunnel of expression) in philosophical debate, you don't need a censor.

You need a custodian!

-- Posted by HerndonHank on Sat, May 1, 2010, at 7:23 PM

Isn't BWI against the law? Now this is humor loud,just so you don't bust a capacitor

(blogging while intoxicated) ;)

-- Posted by boojum666 on Sun, May 2, 2010, at 2:52 PM

Liberal or conservative, who cares as long as they don't weigh 200 lbs. Right fellas. Unless you are into that sort of thing, and that's cool, too. Heavy chicks need love. Oh and chunky can you send me a pic, you sound like a pretty hot chick. But only if you are one of these conservative women, that you speak of. I bet Palin is a beast in the sack.

-- Posted by Platinumtoaster on Mon, May 3, 2010, at 1:54 AM


If you or the GAZETTE editors can review the comments on this blog and find any seriously socially redeeming virtues -- Please advise at to which ones and how.

By the way -- having seen photos of the Boulder maximum-legal-skin couple, it is obvious why the neighbors are complaining.

Beauty is skin deep -- UGLY IS ALL THE WAY THROUGH.

-- Posted by HerndonHank on Mon, May 3, 2010, at 11:07 AM

"Hmm. I am still just a bit confused as to how no one liked "grammy-mammies.""

Maybe there just aren't enough grampy's on these boards to appreciate the grammy-mammies.

-- Posted by SWNebr Transplant on Tue, May 4, 2010, at 11:02 AM

So according to our resident liberals, only those they deem as beautiful can be seen in public, or even on their own private property, in the nude, or at least topless. So much for social justice.

-- Posted by Chunky Peanut Butter on Tue, May 4, 2010, at 5:07 PM


For the profit seekers out there, possibilities are endless.

>>Special kneepads for some to prevent bruising of the lower frontal-thighs and knees.

>> Or as a total preventative for those same ladies, a modified velvet surfaced flexible handcuff to fasten certain pendulous appendages behind the neck when engaged in gardening, or rigorous exercise.

>> A Sun lotion squeeze dispenser on a neck strap so it is always handy, even when going topless and with only the modest G-String.

>>Day of the week DayGlo G-Strings or Brazilian dental floss bottoms to qualify for legal necessities in those restrictive communities such as Boulder subsidized public housing.

The for profit possibilities are limitless, restricted only by how soon your conservative approach to restricting governmental control over American lives can be established.

Reduce governmental interference:

Curtail Big Government:

Let everyone wear sidearms, and grant them the freedom to just shoot anyone who irritates or offends them.

Restrict criminal trials in such cases to deciding if the deceased offended his or her killer enough to award punitive damages and cost of ammunition from the deceased's estate.

By doggies, we'll stop this governmental interference with our lives yet!!

-- Posted by HerndonHank on Tue, May 4, 2010, at 5:35 PM

Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration:

Hot topics
Christmas for H.C.
(2 ~ 10:26 AM, Feb 2)

Living Righteously Through The NFL
(6 ~ 12:12 PM, May 29)

Having Fun In Liberal States
(24 ~ 5:47 AM, Jan 15)

(10 ~ 3:51 PM, Oct 23)

Elizabeth Warren's Eleven Tenants of Moonbattery
(7 ~ 5:23 PM, Sep 1)