|
|
Overcast ~ |
|
|
Some Words of WisdomPosted Sunday, November 22, 2009, at 9:27 AM
"Work as though you would live forever, and live as though you would die today." - Augustine "Og" Mandino "You must understand the whole of life, not just one little part of it. That is why you must read, that is why you must look at the skies, that is why you must sing and dance, and write poems, and suffer, and understand, for all that is life." - J. Krishnamurti "A man may fulfill the object of his existence by asking a question he cannot answer, and attempting a task he cannot achieve." - Oliver Wendell Holmes "The more you loose yourself in something bigger than yourself, the more energy you will have." - Norman Vincent Peale "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." - Martin Luther King "Our talents are the gift that God gives to us. What we make of our talents is our gift back to God." - Leo Buscaglia "Throughout the centuries there were men who took first steps, down new roads, armed with nothing but their own vision." - Ayn Rand "To put the world right in order, we must first put the nation in order; to put the family in order, we must first cultivate our personal life; we must first set our hearts right." - Confucius "...the middle of the road is very dangerous, you get knocked down by the traffic from both sides." - Margaret Thatcher "You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something." - Winston Churchill And finally - "For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Of whom the whole family in Heaven and Earth is named, That He would grant you, according to the riches of His glory, to be strengthened with might by His Spirit in the inner man; that Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith; that ye, being rooted and grounded in love, may be able to comprehend with all saints what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and height; And to know the love of Christ, which passeth knowledge, that ye might be filled with all the fullness of God." - Paul the Apostle It is my own sincere prayer that all of you take time to appreciate your families this Thanksgiving. Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Hot topics Trying to Understand Liberal Morality(19 ~ 10:26 AM, Mar 15)
Work In Progress
Consent by Shotgun
I Just Want You To Love Me
Decept-a-Cons and The Big Lie
|
Happy Thanksgiving to everyone!
A very good sampling from a wide range of outlooks and personalities.
Have a God blessed time of thanksgiving to all.
That quote from Ephesians is one of my favorites. I agree with Mickel. We appreciate you, and pray you will keep up the good fight.
Have a Blessed Thanksgiving everyone.
"Thanksgiving Day, a function which originated in New England two or three centuries ago when those people recognized that they really had something to be thankful for -- annually, not oftener -- if they had succeeded in exterminating their neighbors, the Indians, during the previous twelve months instead of getting exterminated by their neighbors, the Indians. Thanksgiving Day became a habit, for the reason that in the course of time, as the years drifted on, it was perceived that the exterminating had ceased to be mutual and was all on the white man's side, consequently on the Lord's side; hence it was proper to thank the Lord for it and extend the usual annual compliments."
Mark Twain
George Washington said, regarding Thanksgiving, ...it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favour..."
But Guillermo thinks he is smarter than George Washington.
Abraham Lincoln, said regarding Thanksgiving, "...announced in the Holy Scriptures and proven by all history, that those nations are blessed whose God is the Lord...But we have forgotten God. We have forgotten the gracious hand which preserved us in peace and multiplied and enriched and strengthened us, and we have vainly imagined, by the deceitfulness of our hearts, that all these blessings were produced by some superior wisdom and virtue of our own..."
But Guillermo thinks he is wiser than Abraham Lincoln.
Ronald Reagan said, regarding Thanksgiving, "In this spirit, Thanksgiving has become a day when Americans extend a helping hand to the less fortunate. Long before there was a government welfare program, the spirit of voluntary giving was ingrained in the American character. Americans have always understood that, truly, one must give in order to receive."
And, "Searching our hearts, we should ask what we can do as individuals to demonstrate our gratitude to God for all He has done. Such reflection can only add to the significance of this precious day of remembrance."
But Guillermo thinks he knows better than Ronald Reagan. Guillermo is of a "new" generation, a generation that urinates on American history, and tramples on traditions.
In Reagan's' Thanksgiving 1981 speech, the former President said, "let us recommit ourselves to that devotion to God and family that has played such an important role in making this a great nation, and which will be needed as a source of strength if we are to remain a great people."
But Guillermo thinks that we should bow to liberal hate, and submit to caustic leftist beliefs. In the tortured mind of Guillermo, America should kneel to his wisdom, and praise his vision of America.
I don't freaking think so.
There you are Sam, I hated it when we weren't talking. Just so you know, I didn't write those words (that's what those little thingies are at the beginning and end of the paragraph above the first and last word...it's also why I wrote Mark Twain at the end).
Nope, I just figured that since you were sharing quotes about thanksgiving some other perspectives deserved to be shared also....you know this being America and me being free to do so and all.
Here are a couple more:
"They made us many promises, more than I can remember, but they kept only one; they promised to take our land, and they did." --Red Cloud
"I celebrated Thanksgiving in an old-fashioned way. I invited everyone in my neighborhood to my house, we had an enormous feast, and then I killed them and took their land." --Jon Stewart
"You know that just before that first Thanksgiving dinner there was one wise, old Native American woman saying, "Don't feed them. If you feed them, they'll never leave." ---Dylan Brody
"Wait, we can not break bread with you. You have taken the land which is rightfully ours. Years from now my people will be forced to live in mobile homes on reservations. Your people will wear cardigans, and drink highballs. We will sell our bracelets by the road sides, and you will play golf, and eat hot h'ors d'ourves. My people will have pain and degradation. Your people will have stick shifts. The gods of my tribe have spoken. They said do not trust the pilgrims, especially Sarah Miller. And for all of these reasons I have decided to scalp you and burn your village to the ground." --- Paul Rudnick
Happy Thanksgiving to all........If I recall Guill said something in a past blog about be a lawyer,If so that explains allot....
Um, no I am not a lawyer
The dominant group huh? God's people? The oft hated Fredrick Nietzsche used to speak at great length about what has more contemporaneously been referred to as social Darwinism. In other words, the anti-ethical principle that "might makes right." Yessir, he was quite a mover and shaker in philosophy circles, right up until Hitler and his wild boys took him a little too seriously. We all know how that little practice of "might makes right" and forced social Darwinism turned out.
"What is good? All that heightens the feeling of power in man, the will to power, power itself. What is bad? All that is born of weakness. What is happiness? The feeling that power is growing, that resistance is overcome."
Of course, he wrote about "dominant groups" and those who "lost the game" in books like The Antichrist, and Beyond Good and Evil; he supported his arguments that "power is the end, not the means," based on assertions like: "God is dead." So while I appreciate that you are supporting your world view with respected philosophical arguments, your reliance and subsequent conflation of social Darwinism, Nietzschean philosophy, and Christianity is more than a bit confusing.
Although, I think you were right when you implicitly (and quite obviously unknowingly) linked the morality of American expansionism with the foundational philosophy of Nazism. Good form...actually you may understand Thanksgiving more than I gave you credit for.
Guillterra,
So quickly were you anxious to show your toxic view of America and Americans, that you make stuff up. In all of the quotes Sam had in this blog, I don't think any of them were about Thanksgiving. They were just good quotes, with Sam saying "Happy Thanksgiving".
But the hateful person that you are, you thought you take swipes at Thanksgiving, and Sam called you on it. Then you condescend. My oh my, what a brilliant and marvelous and talented man you are, in your own mind. To me, you are a small man, probably in more ways than one.
Sam, some time ago you said the Guillterra craziness would clearly demonstrate the hatred in liberals hearts, and the insanity of leftist thought. I have had friends and family members, not really in to politics, but after reading Guillterra's vile comments, as well as these other liberal haters, they are beginning to see the danger liberals pose to our country. I am understanding why you write and tolerate the Guillterras. You're in our prayers.
Poor Candy, I know it is hard for you to empathize,; to take another's perspective. It takes a grown up person to have never walked in another person's shoes but yet be able to truly feel sorrow for injustices committed against that person. I also understand that you have bought whole heartedly into a belief system that informs you everyday that not only has America done no wrong, but that America can do no wrong because, as Sean so bravely pointed out..."we are God's people."
The problem with your convictions, to quote Nietzsche again, is that they are "more harmful to truth than lies." Thus, when your perspective is challenged, by me or Mark Twain, you gnash your teeth and tear your hair because your entire life and everything you have ever thought is based on surreality, and so easy and thin is your perspective that one simple critique of Thanksgiving by one of America's greatest authors, brings out the worst parts of you.
Here is a small consolation: the pilgrims who conducted the genocide of native Americans weren't actually Americans (at least not until 1776), they were Europeans, (who, as we all know, never minded steering their ships across the Atlantic to discover new races of humankind and obliterate them).
Mr Inglaterra
News flash, Mark Twain is a fictional character. It isn't very wise to base your attack on Mr Eldridge on a fictional statement.
Newsflash Randy, Mark Twain is a pseudonym, a pen name, a fictional character is about the last thing Mark Twain was.
Yes, real or not real? Do you see the differance.
What is your facination with Nietzsche? You keep quoting him, do you have a thing for insane Germans? You are drooling over the 19th centuries whack job you must get a rise over the 20th century one then.
I have spent a fair amount of time reading the blogs and the lobs that seemed to be hurled at each other from both extremes. As you can see from my site name, I once was much like Sam and Duffer. I voted for Bush (twice), I watched Fox News, I went to a very conservative church that supported (and even secretly applauded) killing of abortion doctors and taught that the world was created 6,000 years ago. Mr McLoud, you would hav fit in very well there.
But then something happened: I started to ask questions. I did my own research and found out the things that people like Rush and Glenn Beck were saying were wrong, and hateful, and were meant only to create fear. In short, I began to think for myself. I began to see the consolidation of wealth in the hands of a few, and it made me shudder to think of what huge conglomerates with giant tax loopholes and tax breaks were doing to small businesses.
Now, I'm not saying that I agree with the likes of Guillermo or Carl. You two may have some valid points, but every time you participate in the insult games, I lose respect for you. Case in point, Guillermo, why did you choose to disparage Thanksgiving in this blog? Like someone commented, the blog wasn't about Thanksgiving really. I think sometimes you intentionally do things like that to antagonize. It makes for great comedy, but does little to further your cause. Now, you are right, America has made mistakes, and those mistakes should be discussed, but you take them to the point of making this great country the root of evil in the world.
Now Sam, don't think I will spend a lot of time defending you if do decide to devote any more of my time to this blog. Anyone who quotes (and I am assuming reads) Ayn Rand most likely has the intellectual capabilities of a teenager. Her grand theories and diatribes on self reliance were hardly applicable to any real world situation, and the contradictions in her reasoning are flawed to the point of ridiculousness.
I hope I can provide what seems to missing from these blog discussions: a view from the middle, which is where most Americans find themselves (Sam you are NOT the mainstream, and neither are Carl or Guillermo). And any of the right wingers on the board, just keep in mind that as you spout your talking points, I know exactly where you are coming from and where you get your information. Because I used to be you.
Randy, not every comment Guillermo makes can be tied to Hitler or abortion. Stop trying, it just makes you look silly.
Candy, I appreciate you folks very much.
I am "mostly" native American. My mother is native Indian, born on a reservation. Many years ago, mom taught my brothers and me lessons on life that included, of course, what happened to native Americans.
Oh yeah, there were treaties broken, promises made repeatedly, and then broken, lies, more lies, treachery and deceit.
I can remember a question mom asked us boys years ago. That question was, "do you want to hate all your life because of mistakes made by men you didn't even know, and circumstances you had no control over?"
Her solution, as a native American woman, was to embrace America, the good ideas, and the good people, and the good principles. She was a warrior, no doubt about it. There were at least two times that she had to sue, go to Court, to reverse racist and sexist workplace decisions. But she never complained, or berated the USA. No, she believed that if we would embrace the liberty that America offered, and carry God in our hearts, that God would look out for all peoples, of all colors.
Mom fought through the growing times for women's' opportunities, and was tremendously successful, all the time reminding us that liberty was the solution to our problems, not government, not bitterness, not resentment.
She also reminded us of the fact that we natives, we not perfect by any means. Mom was honest in her assessment of we natives. We were living like barbarians when the western expansion began. We were harsh to women and children and we stole and looted, and had little regard for anyone but ourselves.
To those that claim they hate America because of what early pioneers did to Indians, who asked you? Clearly you seek any reason to tear at traditions and foundations of this country while you strive for your liberal utopia.
My English ancestors came over here as indentured servants, economic slaves, so, if we listened to whinny liberals, I should be running around demanding my economic justice. Where's my check? Where's my check? And being hateful and spiteful.
Mom taught us that life isn't fair, however, the harder you work, the luckier you get. You get beat sometimes, you win sometimes. It would be wonderful if just once, liberals could spare us all from their phony righteous indignation.
Sam, this is the closest thing I think I have ever seen to showing genuinely how you feel with your own words. Your mother's story is inspiring, and her experience should be used as a shining example of perseverance.
reformedrightwinger - welcome. Sincerely, thank you for taking time to read and comment.
I enjoyed your frankness, so allow me to be frank as well, I don't like moderates.
Did I hear you right, you no longer are a believer? Or are you a moderate on God now as well? Jesus said, "I wish your were hot or cold. If you are lukewarm I will spew you out of my mouth."
I am mainstream, whether you like it or not. This is a center-right nation. I disagree with you regarding Glenn Beck, he is a patriot, and is doing the work the extreme media should be doing.
I am glad you ask questions. We all need to ask questions. However, it would be so nice to get some answers, instead of insults, attacks, smears, and lies.
I don't quite understand your puny attack on my intelligence. First off, I have never claimed to be intelligent. Second, I have never claimed to be a Ayn Rand disciple. Sure I have read Ayn Rand, but I do not agree with her every utterance. For example, Ayn Rand was an atheist, am I believe in the God of The Bible.
Also, I do not need defending. I appreciate defense when it comes, but I speak from my heart, and as best as it is possible within me, I speak the truth.
The truth needs no defense, merely an audience.
I also think you have bought a bunch of lies on wealth. You were nebulous in your attack, so I cannot be as specific as I would like.
If you start believing the liberals lies regarding wealth, then you'll end up envious. If you were truly once a conservative, then you know that liberalism will make everybody equally poor, except for the oligarchy of course. Is that what you want to be, a member of the oligarchy?
Well, thanks for your kind words about my momma. Really, I do appreciate it.
I'm glad to hear that you aren't a Randofile. I guess I drew from experience of other people who quote her. Her writings were one the beginning of my questioning of my political views.
But honestly Sam, saying you are center-right is like saying Mark Mangino has a little weight problem. Olympia Snow is center-right. Ben Nelson is center-right.
I'm sorry you don't like moderates, but I have come to realize that not everything is black and white, and no issue is inherently good or bad. Most people want to know both sides and not just hear "my side is correct, and their side is stupid" that seems to come from a lot of people on this board. I will listen to both sides of issues, and will most likely ask questions more than anything on this board.
Dadburn it all Sam,
I actually thought for the first little bit today, this was going to be a civilized confirmation of our great experiment.
One feller even came up with the male bovine excrement bit that "MARK TWAIN is a fictional character."
As old Tater Salad says, "You cain't fix stupid."
Mark Twain was the pen name for Samuel B. Clemans of Hannibal, Missouri -- who was this country's leading author and humorist for about 50 years.
Tom Sawyer, Becky Thatcher and Huckleberry Finn were all fictional characters he created.
The non-de-plume Mark Twain was taken from the steamboat era's depth-sounding "leadsman's" calls for water depth along the Mississippi.
Folks, as a long-time conservative businessman, who has in all probability created more jobs and small town business volume than any 12 of you Conservatives combined -- I have come to accept the knee-jerk ultra right bunch will never actually think about anything.
Sam, Claiming Glen Beck is center-right and actually a centrist is like saying the Pope is a practicing Orthodox Rabbi.
You remind me of Strom Thurmond claiming to be a moderate in all things, except those 200 items which really count.
Produce children with a black woman, but never recognize those children or give them his name.
Of Arkansas Dogpatch Mayor Orval Faubus standing in the North Little Rock High School doors and defying Eisenhower. [After leaving the governor's mansion, where he managed to manipulate award of virtually all of Arkansas'Interstate Highway contracts to cronies, Orval was mayor and greeter at a DogPatch tourist park. Sam, bet you have cussed those miserable roads from Memphis to Texarkana every time you made the trip.]
I know the worst miles I ever put behind the steering wheel of a diesel, was that Memphis-Texarkana run. My back and kidneys were sore for a week.
Anyway, folks, if you can't quit the belly-aching and moaning and groaning, join me in serving Thanksgiving Dinner at some Salvation Army close to you.
Bet you can't help with that for a half day without being eternally grateful for what you have. Do it for 30 years, and some of your uber-conservatives might begin to understand the reason for a religious philosophy.
And please stop worshipping all these public figures -- I knew Barry Goldwater before/during and after during his run for the presidency;
Reagan before he was governor; Ralph Brooks before he was governor.
Barry was a great drinking buddy, but did not author a single piece of important legislation during all his expensive years in the Senate.
Reagan as a first time candidate, delivered the speeches written for him and rushed back to his Pinochle game;
I probably disagreed with Ralph Brooks personally more than with Reagan and Barry combined, but he was intelligent, informed, capable and knew what he wanted to accomplish. Egotistic, you bet your sweet bippy. But, he earned every taxpayer dollar he ever received, even if I did not like him and the feeling was mutual.
But, I never called him anything worse than Ralph, usually Mr. Brooks because he had earned that respect by the time he was running McCook College and he never failed to respond with courtesy. Still respect the man. Still recall Barry with nothing but good memories and Reagan with dismay at the thought of anyone with such depth of ignorance holding high office.
With hind sight, even though he and his administrations were managed by his "kitchen cabinet" of millionaires, He still was a better president than both Bushes combined.
At least he did not do the great damage they both left.
God, what a bunch of assholes!!!!
Sam makes a sincere Thanksgiving wish to his readers, and 5 comments later the resident smartass start pontificating and politicizing!!!
I can't wait for Christmas to see what the windbag scoops up in response to "Merry Christmas"!! Careful what you say Sam!!
Thanks for the good wishes Sam, and we wish you a Happy Thanksgiving also!!! Stay safe!!
Well Duff, let me break your heart about Christmas a little early this year. During missionary trips to "pagans" the missionaries realized it would be easier to convert the "heathens" who hadn't any knowledge of the new "true God" if they could correspond their holy times with those of the heathens. Step one was manipulating the birth of Christ to align with the winter solstice. The actual birth of Jesus is widely considered to have been in the warmer months.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but Christmas could just as easily be called the Feast of the Solstice or even Naive Druid Day.
God bless America
Thanks for demonstrating my point, Carl! You are just as bad as PP the smartass. Can't let any opportunity to pontificate and deficate slide by, can you?
who is PP the smatass? If I'm to be compared in a negative fashion I certainly wish to be aware of the yardstick.
God bless America
Oh come on Carl!! The Pukelosi Punk, Iggy! Can't you keep up???? Not really a yardstick, just a steaming pile in the park!!!!
"Yes, real or not real? Do you see the differance."
Randy, Mark Twain is quite real. Flesh and blood. So is Samuel Clemens, wanna know how I know? Because a fictional character doesn't get to choose a nom-de-plume. For example, is HerndonHank or dufferxyz real? Of course they are, using a handle does not make a person any less real. And beyond that, even if Samuel Clemens chosing to write Mark Twain on his books, made him fictional, the simple act of creating a fictional character to present an argument on your behalf does not invalidate that argument.
Which brings me to my second response to you. It was Sean who unwittingly brought Nietzsche into this conversation when he evoked his "might makes right" and social Darwinism theory: that Europeans and subsequently Americans were justified morally in conducting their genocide because, afterall, we won and they lost. This is PURE Nietzsche.
Also, you might think any number of things about Nietzsche, but simply saying that he was crazy, therefore not valid, is illogical. An argument is determined to be logical or illogical, or valid or invalid, by the merits of the argument itself, regardless of the author. What you have done is commit an ad hominem counter-argument, which as we all know is a logical fallacy, and therefore an invalid retort.
"Case in point, Guillermo, why did you choose to disparage Thanksgiving in this blog? Like someone commented, the blog wasn't about Thanksgiving really. I think sometimes you intentionally do things like that to antagonize."
The opening and closing lines to this blog certainly are related to Thanksgiving, whether the quotes address the holiday or not. If it makes it simpler to understand, assume I was responding to either reference Sam made to Thanksgiving.
That being said, yes I not only admit, but openly support my intention to disturb, and offer a critical perspective of Sam's Thanksgiving advise. As duffer said, he was giving a sincere Thanksgiving wish to his readers, being one of those, I am certainly within my rights to provide him with an alternative perspective of Thanksgiving. I am glad it was upsetting, that was absolutely the point. But I do not, as you say, believe the US to be "the root of all evil." I simply believe that an honest person has the obligation to not be blinded by affection for something with the amount of power and influence of the US government. Also, it is incumbent upon us to constantly remind ourselves that not only are we not perfect, but as often as we have been a source of good in this world, so too have we done great evil in our history. Making this acknowledgment is how progress is made, and this is how progress is not undone.
Oh, I didn't catch that as I usually just ignore your senseless name calling blather.
God bless America
Don't look now, but PP just left another big steaming pile!!!!
You see Carl, duffer is not (ahem) very (how do I put this gently)...smart. And since Sam, or Rush, or Beck, or any other right wing screwball hasn't given him his counter argument to what you or I wrote, and because he lacks the (uh), you know...intelligence to formulate his own arguments, all he is left with are silly insults, that really aren't terribly insulting.
I have to agree GI, I find his witless insults to be funny except, of course, when he wishes me dead which he has done at least twice. The death wishes I find hilarious and a testament to his (cough) intelligence.
God bless America
See what happens when Pelosi walks her puppy in the park without taking along a do-do bag????
Thank you, Duff, for proving our point.
God bless America
Don't you mean "doo-doo" bag?
Ok Carl or Gill...which one of you is Duffer in disguise? Seriously, that much asinine drivel cannot come from a real person.
I'm starting to think Duff is Sam in hiding. Duff only comes out of hiding to call people terrible names who disagree with Sam whenever Sam can't refute an argument counter to his position.
God bless America
And there it is...
Thank you Carl - very "Johnny on the spot" of you. What a sad sad person you are. Pathetic.
I don't pretend to know the date when Jesus was born, but I am not ashamed to celebrate it in the winter.
knowledge of the new "true God"??? Wow, in quotes - How can someone that uses your tag line take a shot at the day we celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ?
The shame you must feel...
It does however shed light upon your past comments. "God Bless America" coming from someone claiming this garbage shows that you certainly have some personal guilt issues.
Seriously...how can you say something like "God Bless America" after every post and then say "the missionaries realized it would be easier to convert the "heathens" who hadn't any knowledge of the new "true God" if they could correspond their holy times with those of the heathens."
If you say "God Bless America" and we discover that you don't believe in the "new true God" (your words - not mine), then how can we trust that you believe in America?
Pathetic...transparent...shameful. You have zero credibility.
According to Randy the only people on here that ARE real are those who don't use handles. Sorry reformed, I know you thought that you were real, but alas, you are not.
Oh and I can't speak for Carl, but duffer certainly is not my alter-ego.
Like Danny Torrence's finger in "The Shining?" Or, like I said, maybe it's you or GI, trying to paint this over exaggeration of a right winger to make the people that agree with Sam look bad.
Husker,
Carl writes the facts. There is no birth record of Jesus. Nobody knows when he was born. The date for Christmas was selected to be as inclusive as possible for all the Pagan religions' holy days, that the Christian movement needed to incorporate in order to gain a toe hold.
Carl writing an accurate history of these events is not deleterious of a commitment to a God. Perhaps you wrongly assumed that when he writes "God Bless America" he means God (the Christian version) Bless America." Or maybe I am comletely wrong.
So Guillermo, you are saying that I am a figment of my own imagination? Well, I tell you buddy, I just punched myself in the face. And it hurt.
Maybe all three of us are the same person!!!!!
Sorry, reformed, your accusation does not apply, duffer is not me. Although, that isn't a bad idea.
Maybe we should all worship at the alter of Iggy, Carl, Hank and the rest of the free-loaders!!!
Reformed, at the risk of you dealing yourself more bodily harm:
Im not saying that, I was informed by Randyp that this is the case for people who write publicly but don't use their real names. What is worse is that nothing we write can be valid because we aren't real.
That is if we can ever determine if they believe in anything beyond their own narcissism!
"you guys can be real a******s and keep it smart"?????????????????? Are you Fredd in disguise??????
To the reformed right winger, I thought your comments were very interesting. I can understand some of your disquietude.
Before I address you comments specifically, I appreciate your clarity with people like Guillermo, Carl, Fredd, etc. They are not sincere in anything but acrimony.
We have something in common, I have been reading Sam's blogs for months now, and finally decided to chirp in because of this steady stream of hate coming from these liberals like the aforementioned.
I have read Sam's blogs, and while not always in agreement with him, he has a certain honesty of character, which I find refreshing. I also agree with him most of the time, specifically when it comes to tax policy, energy policy, liberty, school issues, In God We Trust, and respect for life.
I have not found anything that Sam has written that I would call extreme. I agree that the mainstream conservative values Sam writes about are in fact mainstream.
Take for example the typical liberal argument about abortion. Almost all liberals use this line. "I don't agree with abortion. I think it is wrong, BUT, who are we to tell a woman what to do?" Yet, liberals want to do exactly that in almost every aspect of our lives.
When it comes to wealth, I think you want to beleive that America is in trouble because the rich are greedy. I don't think so, I think we are in trouble because government has gotten greedy, further, groups who control government, like bureaucrats and unions have gotten greedy. That is my opinion, and I welcome yours.
We conservatives are mainstream. We may not agree on every single point, but we have the ability to work it out.
I happen to be a small business owner, you spoke of the big nasty corporations making it hard on small business. I think you, reformedguy, are dead wrong here. Government is the largest obstacle to success, not rich people or corporations. Government greed, and the liberal politicians need to control everyone is killing business in America, not rich people. Our current government has no business expanding.
Well Sean, if you are content to bend over, grab your ankles, and let them spew their crap, its your choice! I am happy for you!
Sean, I promise that we are a much gentler bunch to "grab your ankles" around. Did you see Brokeback Mountain? The Deer Hunter? These rednecks are brutes.
Speaking to conservatives, it's obvious what guillterra's game plan is. He lowers the level of the debate, hopes to infuriate, and ultimately discourage mainstream people from becoming involved or speaking out. In fact the formerconservative pointed that out. guillterra and his buddies attempt to intimidate anyone that agrees with Sam. You three bozos may want to try something different. I don't think your bully tactics are working.
Do you guys base your entire lives on what you see in movies??? Is that the extent of your life-skills, the powerful images on your latest one dollar rental from Wal-Mart???? If so, maybe you need to change your genre to those that are more aimed at your intellectual level, like SpongeBob!!!
You are right about one thing, Rednecks are brutal! But then, its only wishful thinking on your part! I don't think they would be interested in you!!
Hmmm, perhaps you haven't been reading this blog. So far the only people really debating anything are the Democratically leaning posters Candy. I will give some credit to Sam for actually participating in the conversation this time (something he seems to rarely do these days). BUt realistically, it is you and your ilk that have done nothing but attack, levy accusations, hurl insults, and act un-Christian.
GI,
I understand that, and yes I assumed he was refering to the Christian God. Otherwise he is bordering on religious bigotry.
Had I gotten on this site and referred to others religious beliefs in the same tone as Carl, labeled them as "the new true Jewish God" or "the new true Muslim God" and in such a condescending way, I would be labeled an anti-semite or a bigot.
So which is it Carl? Are you a fraud or are you a bigot?
All of the above!!!
Leo,
I have two examples for you. First, I worked for a specialized daycare for a couple of years. We dealt only with children with severe behavior problems or disabilities. We were able to become a 501c3, which is nonprofit status. Because of our status, we were able to obtain higher rates from the State. We needed these higher rates, and without them, we couldn't have kept and atrracted the professionals we needed to have on staff. Without those additional funds, we couldn't have kept our operation going -- an business that was needed in the community but couldn't have existed without the State funds.
I also worked for a locally owned business a couple of years back. The company had a wonderful reputation and treated its employees well. People loved coming to work every day and employees rarely left. The company was bought by a larger company. Layoffs began, and jobs began to be shipped overseas. Morale dropped and as the little fish was eaten by the bigger one, when the small business was swallowed up by the bigger business, the community suffered. Then the business was sold to another, larger company. Guess what? More jobs lost, more jobs overseas. In essence, big business has created a middle class in other countries at the expense of our own middle class.
And why was the company bought by a larger company, which in turn sold to a larger company still?? Could it possibly have had anything to to with regulations, taxes and mandates that the mom & pop could no longer afford to pay and still make a profit? (they were allowed the privilege to make a profit, weren't they?)
Big business has not destroyed the middle class in America, the government has done very well with that on their own! And, you ain't seen nothin yet!!!!
GI - You may want to do a little looking into the REAL story about Thanksgiving. The one where the Pilgrims worked in conjuction with their native neighbors for generations without bloodshed. The one about how the Pilgrims gave thanks on many occasion without the presence of the natives because they were...well...thankful to be ALIVE; thankful to be healthy; and thankful to have the opportunity to live without the yoke of oppression.
I know, I know, it's easier to be lazy and spew nasty venom programmed into a feeble mind by history revisionists. You once again show how you are not above that brand of antics.
I also know you will have your own special brand of venom to spew back to me. I'm sure your feeble minded lib "posse" will jump on the chum in the water and take it one step further. Libs are just that predictable.
However that will not stop me from wishing you and your posse a blessed thanksgiving.
Adieu.
What do you do Fredd, keep all your posts and cut and paste from blog to blog? Do you really ever have an independent thought or do you just continue to scoop the same old BS into a different pile? I suppose the next words of wisdom from you will be either blast Sarah Palin or tell us that Jesus was a liberal!
So now the procrastinator-in-chief has scheduled a meeting with the boys late at night to discuss Afghanistan! About time! Only been what, 16 weeks? Why do you suppose they want to meet at night? Have a "beer and war talk"? Don't suppose they are scheduled on C-Span? I'm sure there will be a photo op, though!
And Barney Frankenstein, Charley Dangle, and others want to have a "war tax!" Something tells me his left-wing buddies are getting a little impatient with their rockstar boy! There is a really strong message there if he is bright enough to hear it!
Wonder what part of GET OUR PEOPLE THE HELL OUT OF THERE he doesn't understand? All of it??
Back in 1803, the French and English were at war, and on a British Ship, far out into the Atlantic Ocean, the ships' lookout cried: "Captain! There is a French war ship on the horizon."
Quickly the Captain called for his aid. "Bring me my red shirt!" The aide retrieved the Captains red shirt, the Captain put it on, and the battle ensued, the British ship won. Later the aide asked the Captain about the red shirt. The Captain explained that he wore the red shirt in case he was wounded. He could hide the blood from the crew, and they would not lose heart.
The following day, the ship's lookout cried once more, "Captain! There are seven French warships on the horizon!" The Captain quickly turned to his aid, and said, "Quick! Bring me my brown pants!"
Courtesy of Bill Engvall.
Just thought we could use a little levity.
reformed right winger - Do you think it is possible to oversee business and not increase the size of government? If so, I don't mind that. I hate the idea of government taking over a function and doing it twice as bad.
Mickel - the story of Thanksgiving with the new settlers here was a great and powerful story. One that completely repudiates leftist thinking. They tried the communist way, and they damn near starved, almost half of them died. The following year, they tried capitalism, and it was wildly successful. That's why the left attacks Thanksgiving.
Don't you love the selective indignation of liberals. So upset over the treatment of Indians hundreds of years ago, yet, they yawn at the daily murder of three thousand precious children. It doesn't mesh. Their concerns, are what liberal concerns always are, political.
Liberals say they are concerned for women, yet in two areas, pornography and taxation, which directly affect women, they are silent. Prostitution is hard on the women who are victims of that trade. And over taxation steals much of the income women work for outside the home. And with the left, it's political, power games and mind trips.
Yet, we are asked to believe that these angry leftists voices against Thanksgiving are rooted in some deep spiritual feelings for the Indians. We know better.
I must agree with our middle of the roader on this one. Guillermo and his pals act like the USA is the root of all evil, and so I can understand the anger coming from duff and Sean. Folks are getting damn tired of these constant liberal attacks against America and Americans.
The mistake allot of us make, is that we assume that there is some logic behind liberal thinking. There is no logic behind liberal thought, only envy.
To the formerrightwingerguy, I am going to take a little time to read again your comments. Maybe we can agree, more than we disagree, we'll see. I'll be glad to get back to you. I actually had some grandpa duties today, and I fell behind in my reading.
"GI - You may want to do a little looking into the REAL story about Thanksgiving."
Fredd's question is apropos. The real story of Thanksgiving? Hmm, as told by whom? The pilgrims? I have already heard that account Mickel. I urge you to listen to the OTHER version of Thanksgiving, the stories told by the ones most greatly affected by the Pilgrims' greedy desire for more land.
"The following year, they tried capitalism, and it was wildly successful. That's why the left attacks Thanksgiving."
No this is goofy. I have never in my life heard a communist/capitalist argument attached to Thanksgiving until now, so there would be no way for me to attack Thanksgiving on those grounds. ESPECIALLY, because the genocide conducted by pilgrims deteriorates the holiday all on its own. Res ipsa loquitor.
Uhhmmm, thank you?
First of all, Husker, I am neither a neither a fraud nor a bigot. Also my religious beliefs, as I have stated befire, are a personal matter between myself, my friends, and my family and my beliefs have no impact on my political views as religion has no place in politics.
The reason for putting new true god in quotations is simply because to the people being converted, the Christian God was indeed new and they were expected to abandon belief in what they previously knew as their "true God(s)."
Secondly, it is quite easy to believe in America regardless of one's religious views. A country "of the people, by the people, and for the people." is a very inviting idea for people of all faiths.
Lastly, in light of the religious intoloerance that so often attacks everyone not professing to be Christian on this board, allow me to remind you that the pilgrims fled their homeland and came to the shores of what is now the United States of America to found a new nation in which there would be freedom to practice one's religion without persecution. This being the case, it seems that Thanksgiving should be regarded as a chance to embrace the notion that people, regardless of their religious beliefs, should be treated equally and offered the same respect.
God bless America
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Sarah Palin supporters
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKKKgua7w...
You have never heard the truth about Thanksgiving Guillermo becuase you are a product of educational brainwashing, and you got a bucket load of brainwashing. I understand, like Sam has said, that Palin scares you liberals. I certainly don't expect you to be man enough to admit it, because I have seen no evidence of manhood from you thus far. Let me pull a Guillermo here. I have had my many Democrat friends read your comments Guillermo, and they don't want anything to do with your insanity. The vast multitudes of Democrats that I know don't hate America and Thanksgiving the way that you do.
Mr. Leibowitz, your comment regarding your religous beliefs. That may be the single biggest load of crap I have ever heard. Not only that, you're as wrong as you can possibly be. I for one, will not let phony believers such as you, pretend to speak for people of faith. You are a phony. You may be the second most brainwashed person on Earth, next to your buddy Guillermo.
Hey Monte - don't you find it odd that we keep hearing the word genocide from these Obamunists? Yet, they shed no tears for the daily murder of thousands of innocents.
Hey, I'll pull a Guillermo as well. When we point out the murder of thousand of babies that occur every day, Guillermo says it's "not murder." He tells us it's just a little 'o medical procedure. Okay, so this Western Expansion wasn't genocide. It was just some folks figthin' over a little 'o land.
Thus the phony leftists are on display. They bemoan and cry with great anger over Columbus, yet they cannot even recognize true victims of cold blooded murder right before their eyes.
How can one explain such nitwittedness?
To be a liberal, you simply ignore truth and let animosity rule your thinking like a political dog in heat. Here in the mainstream of thought, people like you and me, look honestly and soberly at facts to draw the right conclusions. That takes intellectual honesty, and intellectual honesty takes effort.
And........... friends, fellow conservatives, seekers of knowledge, and good folks everywhere.
I do not mind heated debates, I don't care if you call me a name, if that is what you believe. I have the right to challenge your word, and I will. You have a right to challenge mine. We need to keep our intensity, but be careful of using curse words to say how you feel about another person.
This is a nice newspaper, and they are kind to let us bloviate. I fear that our leftist adversaries will use any one thing, or one statement, to hurt us since their arguments fail.
Let us not be timid, let us be smart.
Having said that, I think I hear way to much on the civility of political debate nowadays. I don't know how we can be civil when dangerous forces have seized power in our land, and daily are robbing us and working to make us slaves of the state.
That is hard to do for regular folks. So we get intense, and we fight like hell. The left tries to limit our debate by saying that we have to be nice to them while they try and ruin everything.
I just ask you (and me too) to be careful with the rhetoric. Please continue to take on the nefarious comedians on the left.
"Arguing online is generally just a halfhearted attempt to stimulate the part of our brain being choked by productivity in another window."
-Anonymous
Time to teach you mal-educated cretins again:
Genocide: the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/g...
To which national, racial, political, or cultural group do unborn fetuses belong? Certainly not ALL abortions are the result of overly strict, stupid religious teachings. Just as not every abortion performed is done so by young white women.
Abortion is not genocide my intellectually challenged friends, because there is the little thing called THE DEFINITION OF THE WORD standing in its way.
Guillermo, whatever semantics you want to use, abortion has killed tens of millions in the last forty years.
Your assertion that the United States has engaged in the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group, is false.
You want to excuse the killing of our own babies using fancy words, that is unacceptable. A nation, a people, that would go along with this nonsense, are easy prey for further government atrocities, which is becoming more evidence daily.
You speak out both sides of your mouth, so I must agree that your indignation is political in nature, not altruistic.
"To which national, racial, political, or cultural group do unborn fetuses belong?"
The human race gi...the human race.
How do you sleep at night? Unborn humans are not deserving of any of your criteria or definitions of murder? Does that make it easier for you to condone their executions? Since they don't fit into the Webster's dictionary definition, they musn't exist and their deaths are acceptable.
You are a cold human being...sad.
Carl Leibowitz's "God" bless Carl Leibowitz
Leo,
Who is playing semantics? I gave you the DEFINITION of the word. If you want it to mean something else, it is you who is playing semantics. I am sorry that the word genocide doesn't cover what it wants you to. I believe language is fluid and I know that definitions change. I propose if you want abortions to be thought of as genocide you work tirelessly to change the definition. There is of course the slight problem that woman terminating a pregnancy is not exterminating an entire population. There is also the slight problem that genocide presents an existential threat to a HOMOGENEOUS culture or society, based on racial hatred, or political tactics, and abortion fits neither of these criteria. You fools have your work cut out for you.
Husker23,
No, abortion is not murder. Abortion is not genocide. Abortion is choice, abortion is freedom, abortion (according to the US Supreme court, and I agree) is Constitutional. A woman removing a mass of congregated cells from her own body, be it a tumor or a fetus, are both her own medical choice. It is the responsibility of a progressive society to protect the freedom and choice of women, not impose patriarchal restrictions of them. The banality of the right's "daddy knows best" mentality is exactly what is wrong in this country and the world.
So you were the equivalent of a tumor in your mothers belly...hmmmm...hard to argue with that.
As were you..or are YOU special somehow?
Only special in the sense that MY Mother made the right choice...how about yours?
Sometimes you completely miss the point of the argument by making up false counter arguments.
"The banality of the right's "daddy knows best" mentality is exactly what is wrong in this country and the world." - Yes gi, it is only the males in this country and around the world that are pro-life...my wife, my mother, my grandmothers opinion of abortion mean nothing to you...they aren't even factored into your argument. Are we back to that "evil white male" fight again.
Women who are pro-life??? Blasphemy.
Well I wouldn't know it she had chosen otherwise, would I?
I never said that it is only males that are pro-life. I said that patriarchal impositions are a detriment to the freedom of women. Women can support patriarchy, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I stand by that whole-heartedly (so does history by the way). Muslim men subjugate women in similar (albeit more extreme) ways. Their culture puts heavy pressure on what women can and cannot do, and the result is that women have very little freedom to act as rational agents; free to make decisions with their bodies as they see fit. But Muslim women STILL support their own subjugation, just like your mother, grandmothers, and wife.
Also, you didn't have an "evil white male" fight with me. I don't think ANY group of people are inherently evil, but certain circumstances of life push people (or groups of people) towards evilness.
So...women that support patriarchy postitions must be "subjugated" or "pressured" and thus (in your world) their opinions are less valuable than women who don't? Only the women that choose abortion are truly free??
Your inference that my Mothers, grandmothers, wifes choices were not theirs or that they were "subjugated" is insulting and you are...well...not worth it...
You are the lowest form of human being I have ever witnessed.
Rmont, I am curious as to how my religious views are a load of crap to you. Also, could you inform me as to how I could possibly have been wrong?
I'm dying to know.
God bless America
fredd...you don't need any help from me to make you look a fool...your stupidity speaks for itself with each of your posts.
Sir Duffus,
When you call me a FREELOADER --
You are a miserable, lying, sorry excuse of a worthless human being.
NOW, IS THAT PLAIN ENOUGH?
I am pushing 80 years of age, and for the past THREE-QUARTERS OF A CENTURY [Since 1937], I have AVERAGED WORKING more than 14 hours daily, six days weekly, about 51.5 weeks annually.
For the past three years, my typical day has been 5 a.m. through 9 p.m., seven days weekly, trying to prevent losing my own investments from being eaten by the Bush/Cheney/CitiGroup/BofA/Merril-Lynch/Lehman Bros financial fraud.
While at the same time helping blue collar Americans save their homes and small businesses.
Without knowing their lives and backgrounds, I would never call anyone a slacker, or lazy or freeloader -- Have even been known to help many of that kind of person, knowing their ways.
This has included working complete decades without a vacation, sometimes operating three businesses and personally working 80 hour weeks between them.
It is your kind of sorry-assed excuse of a living person who is the major problem in America.
You don't know what the HELL you are talking about, but you will BS day and night.
From your own words, DUFFUS, there is no doubt you are an IDIOT.
Well, Husker, I guess you should have thought about leaving mothers out of the conversation, but then you had to go and get this little gem in there:
"So you were the equivalent of a tumor in your mothers belly...hmmmm...hard to argue with that."
How quickly you forget your OWN horribleness...Christian (or do you only apply that when it suits you?).
Once again, I never said anything about the value of the women in your life's opinions. You seem to love strawman arguments so let me try one on you:
The women in your family are absolutely subjugated, by men like you who have told them throughout history that they need to stay home and take care of YOUR babies, make YOU dinner, cover themselves in public, God forbid if they have sex before they are married because that would bring shame on YOU. Men like you hate choice for women because your religion is joke, and by proxy so are you.
How was that? Get the picture? Try to stay on the topic, and quit making things up. Oh and if you don't want me to criticize the women in your life, a) don't start something you aren't man enough to finish, b) don't bring them up in the first place.
By the way, for those trying to understand why one business can absorb another -- even a larger business.
IT IS CALLED THE IRS CODE.
To be specific, carefully crafted portions of the IRS TAX CODE slipped in during the various Republican administrations and GOP controlled House and Senate terms -- Starting with Ike, then amended and amended and amended.
How do I know?
From reorganizing numerous small and large businesses across the U.S.
A "bankrupt" Colorado operation, sold to two NYC corporations for a combined $13-Million.
The business entities brought $8-Million from one publicly-held corporation, primarily for the customer list and intellectual property, copyrights and fee-simple titled property.
The corporation brought $5-Million from another even larger corporation, for the "carry-forward tax losses of $7.8-Million. Those nice folks wrote off those tax losses of their new subsidiary during the two subsequent years, and each quarter paid a share of the $5-Million, clearing $2.8-Million before spending a dime.
With small businesses from Coastal California farm towns to eastern Pennsylvania and Virginia, through the Great Basin, Southwest Deserts and Rocky Mountain states; repeatedly I got the business back on its feet and sold it at a nice profit for the owner -- more than 90% of the time selling to a "group" of "chain," which used the IRS tax code to buy with 15-30 Cent tax dollars.
The result, millions of small businesses have been swallowed, because the code allows big business to buy them with tax dollars.
Highly profitable smaller firms can buy in reverse, because they either invest with those dollars or send them in as taxes.
That is why businesses are being swallowed -- big fish eating little fish.
gi...you just can't see the picture from your high horse can you?
#1 - My comment was directed at you being a tumor - not your mother - tongue in cheek in reply to your asinine view that a fetus is equivalent to a tumor.
#2 - It doesn't bother me that you are attacking someone of which you have absolutely no knowledge (my mother, grandmother, wife). That's what you do...that's what you've done since you've begun blogging.
It bothers me that you pressume that any loving, motherly human emotion is "subjugated" and "pressured". Any woman that chooses life is somehow brainwashed into being a care giver...you poor lonely little man. It bothers me that you put so little value on human life. For that you are the lowest of low.
I'm going to do a little pressuming of my own strawman...you were never hugged, told you were special, or given butterfly kisses. Did nobody put a band-aid on your bruises when you had your first bicycle crash?
I am sorry that you never experienced the true motherly emotions and care that the rest of us have.
You really need to face it...some women want to be mothers...even though yours didn't.
Fredd...you are the poster boy of why late term abortions shouldn't be attempted.
Haha, butterfly kisses? Told I was special? No wonder you are confusing piety with self-righteousness.
In response to #1: you are a liar, and a terrible Christian. Now be a good momma's boy and admit you brought mothers up first.
In response to #2: I did come out swinging, and haven't stopped since. No apologies there. But I was asked by a McCook native to give a look to the abject stupidity coming from gutless morons like you on this blog. That is what I have done. I'll match your vim, and I won't stop until you do. You have a problem with my world view and you decided to attack me and my mother, rather than the argument, merely on those grounds. That makes you weak, and I have no qualm exposing you as such.
My love of humanity is not in question to any degree. I have volunteered in soup kitchens, literacy clinics, first aid stations, mentoring programs, YMCA's, and rehab facilities on three continents. It is too bad in your hypocrisy you forget about people and their WELFARE once they are outside of the womb. But I have come to expect that out of Christians. No, Husker, as a matter of fact I am brimming with love for my fellow humans, which extends beyond love just for Americans, which is yet another pathetic aspect of your existence.
I am sorry your mother dotted on you, and convinced you you were somehow special. I assure you that you are not. I am equally sorry she was weak and ultimately caved to the subjugation by your father, her husband, and all the other "Christian" males in her life.
It is apparent that there is no arguing with momma's little prince who needs butterfly kisses to feel special. So, I won't argue with you further.
Hi Fredd
You ought to take a break Fredd, you are violating several of the posting rules.
you deserve to be banned.
Hi Fredd
What does 666 mean to you?
gi
Can you really be that stupid? Maybe you and fredd are the same after all.
You are a tumor...no attack on your mother. Read again my misguided unwanted fetus.
Although since you insist on continually taking it there, it is obvious that she did fail in many ways with you.
You volunteer...wow, guess you're some kind of hero. Three continents...I'll bet you think that impresses someone.
I volunteer too gi, don't feel the need to gloat about it on some blog anonymously. Does it make you feel good...take away the guilt of being you?
I'm through playing down here in the mud with you. You have sufficient rope now and have exposed yourself for the vile person you are.
You are a punk with a keyboard and a thesaurus...nothing more.
Husker - I tried to talk with Guillermo about this volunteer business some time ago. It is not volunteerism that made America great, it was the liberty for a man or woman to make a profit!
I have much more respect for a man/woman that takes a chance, engaging in self interest, and then having the ability to hire and pay workers.
Guillermo takes the easy way out, (what a shock there), and instead of taking risk, he wusses out and hides in the volunteer world.
Volunteerism is fine, but it is not a solution, merely a feel good step by the gutless. You really want to make a difference? Start a business, see if you have the ability to make a profit, and maybe you can one day offer employment, instead of a half-assed handout.
You also describe him as a punk. Actually, the punk mentality runs through all of liberalism. Look at the comments by Guillermo, Carl, Fredd, and I hate to say it, but HerndonHank as well. These are hateful, bitter folks, with delusions of intellegence.
Thanks Husker and other conservatives for your comments.
"It is not volunteerism that made America great, it was the liberty for a man or woman to make a profit!"
Sam, sorry to do this, my very old, very weak, very sad, idiotic friend, you are back to being Sham. Here is why I know more about your Bible than you do (and coincidentally why you are a bad Christian just like Husker).
WHAT DOES THE BIBLE SAY ABOUT GREED (PROFIT)?
"the greedy man curses and spurns God" Ps. 10:3
"the treacherous are caught by their own greed" Prov. 11:6
"everyone is greedy for gain" Jere. 6:13; 8:10
"be on guard against every form of greed; life is not in possessions" Lk. 12:15
"Gentiles...practice every kind of impurity with greediness" Eph. 4:9
"we did not come with pretext for greed" I Thess. 2:5
(deacons) "not fond of sordid gain" I Tim. 3:8
(false prophets) "in their greed they will exploit you with false words" II Peter 2:3
(false prophets) "have hearts trained in greed" II Peter 2:14
WHAT DOES THE BIBLE SAY ABOUT GIVING OF YOURSELF AND ASKING NOTHING IN RETURN (VOLUNTEERING)?
"But love your enemies, and do good, and lend, expecting nothing in return, and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High, for he is kind to the ungrateful and the evil." Luke 6:35
"For if you give, you will get! Your gift will return to you in full and overflowing measure, pressed down, shaken together to make room for more, and running over. Whatever measure you use to give -- large or small -- will be used to measure what is given back to you." (TLB, Luke 6:38)
"Feed the hungry! Help those in trouble! Then your light will shine out from the darkness, and the darkness around you shall be as bright as day. And the Lord will guide you continually, and satisfy you with all good things, and keep you healthy too; and you will be like a well-watered garden, like an ever-flowing spring." (TLB, Isaiah 58:10-11)
"He who gives to the poor will never want, but he who shuts his eyes will have many curses (Proverbs 28:27)
It is about time to stop calling yourself Christian old man. Your God is the American capitalist system--you hump that like some sort of hellbreed cross between a false "profit" (haha) and the anti-Christ. Keep spewing your filth and I will be here to keep you clothed in stupidity.
Good God, Sam, you chastise a man for volunteering??? It was taught to me at a very young age that helping those less fortunate is a virtue...taught to me IN CHURCH SAM!!! You , who proclaim Christian values would look down on those who aid others? Every year before we give thanks for our blessings, my family helps serve meals to those who have noone to share the holidays with. Sure there are some idle bodies but there are also widows, widowers, disabled people and veterans. Giving of my time and energy is an act that I am proud of and an act that should not be ridiculed. Shame on you calling yourself a good Christian Sam Eldridge.
GI, keep up the good work, the world needs people like us now more than ever.
"Charity begins at home, but should not end there"
-Proverbs...THE BIBLE
God bless America
Sam,
I think your response to GI sums up the conservative movement quite nice. And your words should be remembered and repeated to everyone you meet. I think you should go to your pastor and tell him how you feel. I think you should go to a local shelter and tell all of those freeloaders to get their own turkey dinner and let the volunteers eat the meal.
Sam, views like these are why I have abandoned many of my conservative positions. I disagree vehemently with GI on many, many issues, but how dare you downplay and ridicule charity the day before a holiday established to give thanks for what we have in our lives.
I also find it baffling that a conservative think people shouldn't volunteer to help those less fortunate than them. Who does that leave? The Government? Or No one? Which do you prefer?
The Bible does not say that money is the root of all evil, The Bible says the love of money is the root of all evil.
Reformed, you are thinking incorrectly. Have you not heard that it is better to teach a man to fish, than to just give a man a fish?
I think it would be much better to give a person a job, than a handout. I know the left doesn't like that attitude, they want the praise of others as they do their good deed. Volunteerism is fine, and if a person wants to do some volunteer work, go do it. But, liberty, the freedom to fail or succeed, is far more valuable than a handout.
Liberals want a welfare society, where all of us stand in line to get our cup of soup from these wonderful volunteers. Spare me.
I never called myself a "good christian" Carl, so stop telling lies. Who are you to determine how a Christian should act? Are you judging me? Heaven forbid.
There is a difference between profit and greed. Profit is the proper use of money, greed is the love of money.
The problem with your liberals is, that you are greedy for the profits others have made. You're eaten up with envy.
There are some who read the Bible and try and make it conform to their liberal delusions. Jesus was a fan of profit, and gave parables to prove it.
Just for the record: "Wow! You volunteers are a wonderful!" There, you have your reward.
I will wait to hear you explain how it is better to hand a guy a cup of soup than give him a job.
Sam,
You are on fire today...well written, to the point, and unlike with me, they haven't dragged you into the mud with them. Great points.
They are predictable and continue to read what they want to read, ignoring the facts...misguided perhaps, but I have had my fill of them all. They are not here looking for a debate, only a fight.
Good work Sam.
Sam,
You set a trap for Guillermo and he went for it full bore. The liberals really do think that profit is greed. They were taught that nonsense for years in the schools, part of the indoctrination you talk about.
If I listened to Guillermo, I should stop my small business, get rid of my employees, and work at the soup kitchen, like Michelle Obama did in her $500 tennis shoes.
You are right about Christ teaching that profit is good, not only good, but God expects it from us. Read the parable of the talents.
Buddy, you have a great Thanksgiving.
Husker, I am glad to know you are out there as well. I do think we conservatives, we mainstreamers, are winning, so expect the liberals to be even more hysterical in the days to come. Thank you for your comments.
Thanks again Sam.
Here is a more complete statement of what Ayn Rand thought of Thanksgiving:
"Thanksgiving is a typically American holiday. In spite of its religious form (giving thanks to God for a good harvest), its essential, secular meaning is a celebration of successful production. It is a producers' holiday. The lavish meal is a symbol of the fact that abundant consumption is the result and reward of production. Abundance is (or was and ought to be) America's pride--just as it is the pride of American parents that their children need never know starvation."
http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/thanks...
Randy says: "Anyone who quotes (and I am assuming reads) Ayn Rand most likely has the intellectual capabilities of a teenager."
This comment is an ad-hominem argument fallacy. Rather than speaking to a particular argument, the individual makes an attack against an entire group of people. Read about ad-hominem here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
"Her grand theories and diatribes on self reliance were hardly applicable to any real world situation, and the contradictions in her reasoning are flawed to the point of ridiculousness."
Randy commits the same argument fallacy here by calling Ayn Rand's ideas 'ridiculous'. He doesn't tell us about any particular line of reasoning that he disagrees with, but we should ASSUME that whatever it is, it is not applicable. Really? If that is the case, could someone tell me why a book filled with Ayn Rand's "grand theories and diatribes", namely Atlas Shrugged, continues to sell more than 100,000 copies per year?
Perhaps people aren't getting Randy's point. Or perhaps Randy is just plain wrong
I have always known Inglaterra's intellegence was over stated, but not knowing the difference between greed and profit proves it.
Profit inspires greed. Even a child understand this. The Bible is clear. I am embarassed for all of you. Shame.
Hey CPB - thus Guillermo illustrates educational malpractice. It is not that he isn't bright, but like allot of young folks, their "living water" has been poisoned with mailgnant liberalism.
How else can you explain Guillermos' utter disgust with almost all things American?
Spain is a Socialist country, I wonder why Guillermo doesn't stay in Spain?
Once again, Guillermo show his ignorance of Biblical teachings. Profit doesn't inspire greed, lust does. Seems like one of the 10 commandments addresses this, perhaps #10. Breaking this one leads to the others being broken. Just imagine where the world would be if we just simply followed the BIG 10. Great things have been done off of the profits great people have created.
By the way Iggy, you haven't shown you know the difference between profit and greed.
I can answer that. America is perhaps the greatest idea in recent human history, and this country's government needs to be helping America live up to its potential, as opposed to trading off its foundational ideologies like "promoting the general welfare" for something so banal as profit, something so fleeting as power. Which is not to understate the crucial role that profit has had in advancing our economy to the point we are at now. But it is clear that many Americans, like you Sham and your ilk, worship profit over humanity, over your own religion.
Spain is a great country, with a long and beautiful (and also terrible) history. But Spain is not a world power anymore, and so the work to be done there isn't as important to me as the work that needs to be done in America. The power and influence wielded by the US is so immense that a well educated, democratically minded, socially critcal citizenry is absolutely essential. This road begins with education, and so this is where I begin as well, like it or not.
So, what is profit?
Chunk,
I think I can safely assure you that my knowledge of the Bible is quite adequate.
As far as greed and profit, I watched Christmas Vacation yesterday, and there is perfect example of profit inspiring greed in that movie. I am referring to Clark's 17 years at his company being rewarded by a Christmas bonus that enlisted him the "Jelly of the Month Club," rather than the money he was counting on. The reason for this decision was simple: Clark's boss was more interested in profit and a healthier bottom line than his employees. What inspired this move? His avid desire for wealth and possessions, or put simply: greed.
This story is so simple and understandble because it is an example of art imitating life. Thus it is easily generalizable to real world America, where corporate whores like the recently imprisoned Bernie Madoff, the wild boys at Enron, auto and banking execs, and basically every Wall Street whiz lives and dies by profit (or the appearance of profit), and they do so because they are greedy little pigs. Capitalism would be impossible without people's desire for excess wealth and possesions. You cannot extract profit from greed, not honestly anyway.
You never answered the question. WHAT IS PROFIT?
Really, trying to equate the comedy Christmas Vacation to a real life scenario? Now you're scraping the bottom. Also, it wasn't profit that made your examples evil, but pure greed.
So the question remains, WHAT IS PROFIT?
Sorry I didn't anticipate that you would lack the creative ability to apply a moral in a story to real life scenarios. But do you really think that the situation in Christmas Vacation is not, as I argued, a reflection of the real world? That situation was not unbelievable because we know this kind of thing to happen in the corporate world all the time.
Profit is excess, the want of excess is greed, therefore the desire to profit is greed. There it is in a tidy little syllogism.
Profit is when revenues have exceeded total costs. Basically applies to business entities large and small.
If your goal is life is to work for a company that provides Christmas bonuses, then ask up front. No business is obligated to provide a Christmas bonus. If that ticks you off, find one who will.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I present the crown jewel of modern American education, Guillermo Inglaterra.
"Profit is excess, the want of excess is greed, therefore the desire to profit is greed."
Excess also allows for growth, growth allows for decreased need, therefore the desire to have excess creates less need.
You can word it how you like, but the key here is greed...not profit. Without profit, how would you and your liberal friends redistribute the wealth?
It looks like fun though...let me try one using your method: People eat, the over-indulgence of food is gluttony, therefore people with the desire to eat are gluttonous.
Shame on anyone who has eaten.
Chunk, Christmas bonuses have nothing to with it. That was simply an example that we could all readily recognize. Profit is, by definition excess. Put another way, gain. The Bible I read is quite clear about profiting and gain...or as I have argued, greed. Deny this if you will, although it may be at your own peril if you take the Bible seriously.
Husker,
That is not logical. People eating does not inhere over-eating, as your syllogism suggests. You make an illogical leap: people that eat must therefore over eat, which is not logical.
The difference between your attempt and mine is that profit is, by definition excess. Or as I wrote above gain. You can substitute any definition into my argument and it does not affect the logic...
Profit is gain, the desire for gain is greed, therefore profit is greed.
Keep in mind, I acknowledge fully that profit therefore greed has propelled America to become the enormous economic juggernaut that she is, but that does not reduce the simple and inevitable logic that profitting, and the desire to profit, is anti-Christian.
Profit:
the excess of returns over expenditure in a transaction or series of transactions; especially: the excess of the selling price of goods over their cost.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionar...
Here are more quotes from the Bible that display Sam's poor reasoning (profitting is better than volunteering) from a Christian perspective:
"They are to do good, to be rich in good works, to be generous and ready to share, thus storing up treasure for themselves as a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of that which is truly life." 1 Timothy 6:17-19
"For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils. It is through this craving that some have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many pangs."1 Timothy 6:10
"Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also." Matthew 6:19-21
"No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money." Matthew 6:24
Guillermo,
As you stated elsewhere, you choose not to adhere to Biblical teachings, yet you quote the Holy Bible to suit your needs in this discussion. Doesn't that make you a HYPOCRITE. The Bible is very clear with what we are to do with the fruits of our labors, give back to the Lord what is His,so that He will provide us with our needs. Your blurring of the lines that separate profit from greed won't work here.
No, I do not need to believe that God was properly defined by the Bible in order to be able to read and understand and form logical arguments from what it says. Nor is it necessary for me to believe that Jesus was devine in order to believe that the Bible is a good way to arrange my own personal morality when it comes to earning and giving.
To reiterate: profit is excess, the desire for excess is greed, therefore profit is greed. The Bible is clear when it comes to profit. It says (among MANY other things):
"[If a man]...lends at interest, and takes profit; shall he then live? He shall not live. He has done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon himself."
The Bible is also very clear regarding greed as I demonstrated above. Therefore, to profit or to desire to profit is an "abomination" and thus un-Christian.
Where Sam believes that his greed is better than my volunteering (which is what Jesus asks of us) he contradicts his own claims that he is Christian. Thus, it is Sam (Sham), not I, that is a "HYPOCRITE."
So in other words, you don't know the difference between profit and greed.
Guillermo,
How much of your profit/wage do you give to the needy?
Profit according to the Bible, is an "abomination." Also, profit as I have demonstrated is not distinguishable from, and is actually tantamount to, greed. The Bible is clear on greed also.
If you want to call yourself Christian then you would do well to make only what money you need to support yourself and family, and give the rest away.
To answer your question, I make no money, as I am a student, so my time is all I have to donate to those in need, which I give amply. It has been argued that time is money, thus I spend my excess time (which = money, thus profit) voluteering. Under these conditions, donating my profits (time) is something very important to me.
Assuming that I will one day have an ample salary, I will donate all that I can and still support myself and family. I will also continue to donate my excess time. I will not do this because I believe in doing so I will go to heaven, but rather because giving to those in need is in keeping with my moral identity.
Doing what?
Where in the Bible is PROFIT called an abonination?
And since you seem to have ample time o respond to the blogs in the Gazette, and who knows how many more, could it be said your being greedy with your time?
"[If a man]...lends at interest, and takes profit; shall he then live? He shall not live. He has done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon himself."
http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?q=Ezeki...
Chunk, you could say I am being greedy with my time by posting on this blog (this is the only one), but I never claimed to be a Christian, Sam did/does. The origin of this discussion began when Sam called volunteering "gutless" and "not a solution," as he argued that business and profit is what makes people and America great. This is a blatantly contradictory argument for a person claiming to be a Christian to make.
This is why fredd is right when he says Sam's God is money. This is true of so many people. For them profit and money, wealth and possesions come before religion, before community, before their fellow humans.
Do you know for a fact Sam does not give freely of himself. Did you ask Jesus Christ, or did you just assume?
"It is not volunteerism that made America great, it was the liberty for a man or woman to make a profit!
I have much more respect for a man/woman that takes a chance, engaging in self interest, and then having the ability to hire and pay workers.
Guillermo takes the easy way out, (what a shock there), and instead of taking risk, he wusses out and hides in the volunteer world.
Volunteerism is fine, but it is not a solution, merely a feel good step by the gutless. You really want to make a difference? Start a business, see if you have the ability to make a profit, and maybe you can one day offer employment, instead of a half-assed handout."
Sam Eldridge
There is no assumption Chunk. It is quite clear what Sam believes about giving to others. Any handout, "half-assed" or otherwise would be against the conservative dogma that Sham values and worships well above Jesus's teachings.
It really shouldn't surprise us that someone who can't make the distinction between a fetus and a tumor doesn't know the difference between profit and greed.
Who said I can't tell the difference? The removal of either from a woman's body is a medical decision that is left up to her. That is where I didn't make the distinction. I am not surprised that I had to explain that to an imbecile like you.
Try to see how these "handouts" can save people.
Your intolerance and disdain for those in need makes me sick.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/11/26/s...
God bless America
Somehow,
I fail to see how being a numbers-reliant conservative businessman requires me to switch off my own brain regarding complex issues.
Single issue political litmus tests will never solve local, state or national problems.
The only way to provide workable answers to questions is to consider all possible solutions.
Ruling out 50% to 90% of solutions for being politically incorrect is not businesslike or truly conservative.
Democracy is the messiest form of government.
That said -- It still is the best form of government created to date.
The problem comes when corrupt politicians rig elections and the top court votes along party lines in resolving serious constitutional questions.
In the case of the 2000 Florida elections -- quite possibly the single most important Supreme Court decision in history.
It gave us two wars, total failure to pursue elimination of our nation's and the world's greatest single threat, total disregard for this nation's citizens' constitutional rights, overwhelming financial irresponsibility, debt and federal deficits, endless dispensing for public monies to political cronies and finally -- near total national and global economic collapse.
And for the past year, it has resulted in non-stop vitriolic carping attacks upon a legitimately elected president with whom his critics will disagree regardless.
Tragically, primarily because of his bi-racial reality.
Very well-stated Hank. Brace yourself for the insults.
GI beat me to the cheerlead but great post Hank. Someone will be calling you very unflattering names very soon.
God bless America
Interesting, Hank that you use the term "democracy" to describe our government.
The basic principles of democracy are equality and freedom, which means all citizens are equal before the law and have equal access to power.
Since neither is present in our current state of government; I would propose that we do NOT live in a democracy, but rather a represenative republic, where we give our power to others to govern.
Now, the concept of law predetermines an accepted higher power. In most instances, law from man is precedented by law from God. The laws of our federal government concede power to the states and both concede power to our Creator.
Interesting. I wonder what it would take for the unborn to realize equality before the law in this land?
Hank, you are the one that brought up his race, again, by the way. Are you consumed with race?
These liberals say you have made a brilliant post. Personally, I have never seen any brilliance from you, just anger, hatred, envy, jealously, and a complete lack of understanding of how a Republic works. Well, I guess I do see why these liberals think you are brilliant. You also have a marvelous way of not letting the facts get in the way of your hatred.
The Florida 2000 election was a case of Democrats trying to still an election, and change the rules in the middle of the game, again, typically liberal. The Supreme Court did not let the very liberal Florida Supreme Court, re-write election law in the middle of an election.
So I must conclude that you are ignorant on purpose.
What is wonderful to see, is the American people are becoming wise to liberals and their tactics. It will be an expensive lesson, one that will take decades to correct, but Americans are good folks, regardless of what you liberals think.
You make me laugh too Sam. I think someone has poopy pants. Hank makes a perfectly valid, measured and well written point (something I would never expect you to recognize), he is complimented for it, you fire back with some half-witted screed about ignorance which has no coherence or logic, and HE is the jealous one? Me thinks someone cannot handle the spotlight being off of him. It's okay Sam, I promise that we all still believe you have no idea what you are talking about when write ANYTHING about politics.
You know I don't think these guys hardly ever get out of their cubicles.Keep up the great work Sam...
Fred,The Great Work is the Truth.Not just this government today but the past ones too.Sir,I know because I live in it each and every day.We Americans are losing our FREEDOMS EVERY DAY and if you can't see that my the LORD HAVE MERCY ON YOU SOLE,Sir..
Fredd,you sir,are so blind to real life.
fredd,
You make some good points about Sam and his alleged hate, care to INTELLIGENTLY PROVE IT!
Sean, you are quickly lumping yourself into the same category as Chunk and Duff, which is to say your posts are the blog equivalent of pornography that has been edited for prime time television. Since I know subleties like metaphor and simile are out of your league I will it out for ya...your posts have absolutely no content worth subjecting myself to read.
Having said that, I should note that I do derive a strange joy from reading the senseless, pointless, and devoid of any independent thought blatherings that you and your cronies spew. It pleases me greatly to know that, despite Sam's affirmations, ignorance like yours is just the death rattle of a thankfully endangered beast. May God have mercy on your spiteful souls.
God bless America
Fredd, I use to think that you could not possibly be as half-witted as you appear, but I stand corrected.
I grow tired of your constant mindless attacks on Sam, you have called him a liar numerous times, yet you have never given an example. You are a hater sir, a sad example of a liberal. You and your compadres, Guillermo and Carl, do nothing to advance your cause. You are so bird-brained that you think by smearing Sam over and over again, you are engaging in debate.
The only lies, half-truths, and hatred I have seen, have come from the three of you.
Orville, I can sense your frustration in dealing with the mindless hate demonstrated by Fredd and his pals. You were right to say that Fredd is blind to real life. Liberalism is a fantasy. Liberalism is mental masturbation at best.
So, Orville, I join you in urging Sam to keep up the good work.
My hatred lies only with ignorance Leo.
Hey Sammy, glad to see your cheeleaders are out again givin ya some western grips but offering nothing of substance...as usual.
God bless America
I further agree that Fredd has violated the blog policies repeatedly. He has never made a real point that I can see. Venom seems to be his only weapon. I want to thank you decent folks for speaking out, and supporting Sam, and even more than supporting Sam, you are supporting the truth, common sense, and the real America.
I for one, appreciate it.
Fredd is right. What Sham passes for "facts" are simply the regurgitated OPINIONS of Rush/Beck/Savage. Sam says, Obama hates America; that liberals are out to get him; that greed is a good thing (while also claiming to be Christian); that homosexuality is a disease tearing at the fabric of our society; that evolution is wrong (despite the overwhelming evidence against him); that all media sources that aren't right leaning are in collusion with the left; that our legal system is a puppet for the left; he says honest hard-working "lady police cops" simply doing their jobs are liberal whackos...and on and on...
No leo. and other worshipers of Sham, these are not facts, they are the half-bright opinions of a self-proclaimed ex-hippie whose new psychedelic trips is a.m. radio and the open road. Keep on trippin' Sham, I'll be here when you sober up.
Somewhere Howard Dean is screaming, "Stop posting gi and fredd! You're giving progressive liberals a bad name. Bwwaaaa!!"
Oh snap, Husker! I guess I will stop posting. Err, no wait...you are barely capable of a reasoned thought, let alone determining what is or isn't worthy of Howie's esteemed approval.
Gawd! These liberals are freaking crazy! It is unreal to listen to their trash.
Husker, these liberals on here actually make Howard Dean look sane. I did not think anything could do that.
Fredd is just nuts. So much hate, so much anger, and so many lies. It's hard to believe that there are actually people out there that are that totally messed up in the head.
You know fredd, there was a time in my life that I thought that the xenophobia that Conservatives are often stereotypically accused of was unwarranted. Part of me believed that any population claiming to be so in touch with a benevolent God couldn't possibly be hostile and intolerant towards any of God's creatures, even those that appeared different to them.
This was, of course, pure folly. Conservatives on this site confirm this stereotype with every divisive post. They cannot tolerate alternative opinions from their fellow countrymen and women, they cannot tolerate debate, they turn in abject fear of facts or logic that challenge or dispel their perspective. If they can't tolerate their own people, why should it be surprising that they are just as inhospitable and exclusive to foreign outsiders? Realistically, with their warped version of God and Christianity they are just about the least tolerant, least accepting, and consequently least Christian people that I have come across in my life. Grow up McCook Gazette Cons, do the right thing.
Is there a liberal handbook somewhere that states, "When losing a political argument, attack their Christianity"?
You liberal bloggers seem to play that card an awful lot. It's getting repetitive and tiresome. You must be running out of shock-jock material.
Is there a Conservative handbook that somewhere states "when an opponent gets the better of you, and points out something that makes you look like a total idiot (which will inevitably happen) accuse them referencing a make-believe liberal handbook?"
Talk about a warmed over tactic.
Nice comeback. Essentially repeating my comment, but inserting "conservative"...are you in 5th grade?
Did not...did too...did not...did too...
I am glad we agree that your comment was juvenile.
Guill,Fred,Carl your parents should be ashamed of themselves for letting you out.Maybe they are and none us know it.
Maybe, (as Husker23 so Christianly implied in another thread) our mothers made the wrong choice and should have had an abortion?
Interesting note: you are the second Conservative to attack an argument by bringing up the mother's of posters you disagree with.
Question: What is it about being imbecilic, uneducated, narrow-minded, and Conservative that impels you to such a mind bogglingly illogical and inappropriate tactic? Is it one of these individual characteristics that describes you, or is it a mixture of all of them?
Guill,my apologies to you and Fred,Carl for stooping to your level.And yes I thank for good lord that I'm not as book smart as you.
Surprise, surprise...there's the old liberal stab at Christianity - yet again. You are laughably predictable.
I think gi has debate dyslexia. Reading the blog and rearranging the words into a form that he can argue with.
Let me help you out with that: fool what pathetic you a are!
That was not a stab at Christianity generally Husker, as you so dumbly argue. It was, however, most certainly a stab at you individually calling yourself a Christian, and yet using the argumentative tactic of implying that someone's mother "made the wrong decision" to keep them. Orville, I accept your apology (Husker now its your turn to be a big boy).
It makes me laugh, and it pleases me to know end when you employ such dirty tactics. But if it puts you at ease, or helps in any way, I can promise you I am smart enough to discern that just because you are a bad person claiming to be Christian, it doesn't mean that all Christians are that way.
The Lord killed the Egyptian Army, eh Sean? I wonder, is there any archaeological evidence of that? Or is this one of those, "you just have to have faith" things? Like Joesph Smith's cataclysmic battle between the Nephites and Lamanites that apparently occurred in North America? You know, one of those, well its in the Bible and that's all the evidence I need kinda things?
Here is a the illogical thing about that argument:
The Bible is the word of God, and therefore is true.
How do we know that statement is true?
The Bible says so.
But you are wrong about one thing, it wasn't the Lord that killed the Indians, Europeans and subsequently Americans carried out that genocide. Do you know about free will Sean? If you are Christian I am certain you do. Let's assume that any decent and loving God doesn't conduct genocide, rather, he lets humans carry them out according to their own free will. And in that regard, man is a bad animal, Sean.
But I don't blame you for hating me. It must be frustrating to never have facts or logic on your side, and be constantly reminded of this fact.
"Impossible to walk in this muck, no footing at all!"
Nice counter argument Sean.
Boys, boys, boys. Play nicely. I'm sure there's something compellingly attractive from/about each of you that can be shared on this blog.
Sean, you seem like a Biblical scholar. Can you explain to me how free will (God granting humans the ability of choosing their own destiny), and a predetermined future (God imposes his plan upon humankind) is not a contradiction? Which is it?
Sean,
Don't let the vile from these two (one?) get to you.
gi is like a kirby vacuum salesman who owns a hoover...he appears to be knowledgeable regarding bible verses, then turns around and condones the murder of unborn babies (or as he calls them "tumors")...even using Christianity as a dirty word when he disagrees with someone. He picks and chooses which parts of the Bible are valid depending on the argument at hand and his perceived position.
Didn't you know that the Bible says profit is bad? According to him, the Bible is correct there, but incorrect when you use it to defend your beliefs. I guess you didn't know but he is more wise than God. Just ask him.
fredd...well fredd is his intellictually impaired alter ego who seems to have a man crush on gi (wouldn't that be some kind of narcicist incest?). To respond to anything fredd says gives him too much credit. He is like a monkey randomly pushing the buttons on a keyboard...lucky if his keystrokes make a complete sentence.
So God gave us free will, but has already determined our actions in His plan? The Bible is true, because the Bible says it is true? Can you understand why this stuff is so difficult to believe for anyone with a modicum of critical thinking ability?
But all these contradictions and logical leaps do explain why so many Christians on this site contradict themselves (Husker23's implication that my mother should have had an abortion, Sham's conviction that greed is good). It also explains why there is a giant void in the middle of Conservative posters here where logic and reason was supposed to be.
Since you insist on continually taking my comment out of context, I suggest you go back and reread it and our discussion leading up to it.
Husker,
A) I never said a fetus was a tumor, I said like removing a tumor is medical decision that woman can make, so too is removing a fetus.
B)The Bible DOES say "profit is an abomination."
C) The point that I made, that you failed to refute, is that SAM says greed/profit is good, and that he is Christian, thus he contradicts himself because the Bible is explicit in regard to greed/profit. I never commented on whether I think profit is good or bad, accept when I said that I recognize that greed built the American economy into a juggernaut.
D) How can I be more wise than something nobody can possibly understand; something that may not even exist?
E) I do pick and choose which parts of the Bible are valid. I bet you do too. Is it valid to cut off the heads of gay people? Stone your daughter to death? Or how about Luke's advocating of murder in the New Testament? Is that valid? See what makes you a bad Christian is that you claim to believe these to be God's wishes, and therefor you picking and choosing means you don't follow God's word (shame on you). Whereas I don't believe Jesus was divine, just that had SOME solid moral principles that can be plucked from the Bible and used to arrange my own personal morality.
gi,
A) And I never said your mother should have aborted you...I asked if you thought (in your pro-abortion mind) that she made the right choice in keeping you in an attempt to make you think about how the decisions your mother made affect your very life.
B) The Bible also maintains Seans point which you were so quick to attack simply because the Bible said so.
C) Sam did not say greed was good...profit rather. You can't seem to wrap your warped mind around the concept that profit is not only good, but necessary.
D) Yes, I know...the point is that at times it appears that you don't.
E) If you are going to pick and choose, how can you justify attacking someone (Sean) when he does the same. How can you argue..."just because the Bible says so" in one sentence and turn around and quote from the Bible.
You are correct...I pick and choose too, but I don't attack someone for their interpretation and call them Un-Christian. That's the difference. Whether you or I agree with Sean is irrelevent. Disagreement is one thing, but attacking him, his religion and the Bible to prove your point are another.
Attacking his sources and using those same sources to justify your liberal political position is hypocritical.
Wow Sean, so liberal genocide is your answer...a fine Christian you are indeed!
God bless America
Sean, you are quickly lumping yourself into the same category as Chunk and Duff, which is to say your posts are the blog equivalent of pornography that has been edited for prime time television. Since I know subleties like metaphor and simile are out of your league I will it out for ya...your posts have absolutely no content worth subjecting myself to read.
Having said that, I should note that I do derive a strange joy from reading the senseless, pointless, and devoid of any independent thought blatherings that you and your cronies spew. It pleases me greatly to know that, despite Sam's affirmations, ignorance like yours is just the death rattle of a thankfully endangered beast. May God have mercy on your spiteful souls.
God bless America
A) "So you were the equivalent of a tumor in your mothers belly...hmmmm...hard to argue with that."
Yes, very Christian of you. This is a blatant misrepresentation of what I had said. And, if you disagree with your own misconstruction that tumors are the same as fetuses, then how can that apply to me as you suggest?
B) Which point is that? I am going to explain this once more and then I will chalk it up as lost on you. I DONT CLAIM TO BE CHRISTIAN. This frees me from following ANY tenets of Christianity that I feel are backwards, stupid, illogical, unproven, etc. Claiming you are Christian, but not following these tenets makes you BY DEFINITION a bad Christian, as opposed to a good Christian who follows the tenets. Sorry to illuminate this very simple reality to you.
C) The want of profit is greed. This is simple logic. There is no magic trick here, nothing terribly academic or difficult to understand. I agree that profit has built many nations into great places to live, America among them. I prefer, as I have said many times, a mixture of capitalism and market regulation (socialism). However, great America has become because of regulated profit, profit DOES NOT align with Christianity. In fact to profit is UNCHRISTIAN.
E) The point here is it might be time to start questioning how seriously you take this belief system that you pick and choose from.
Why is that Sean can levy the most insanely un-Christian attacks upon me and others, and that is fine, but me pointing out the hypocrisy in that is not okay? You can trust I will not stop.
I have NEVER used the Bible to support ANY political position of mine. You just aren't discerning the argument I was making...
Sam claimed that profit (which is greed) is necessary and good (I agree with that to a certain extent). But Sam also claims to be a Christian. I demonstrated very clearly the contradiction between desiring profit (greed) and being Christian.
I also mentioned that I volunteer a great deal, which Sam admonished. Another contradiction on Sam's part, as the Bible says that this what the Lord expects. As I have said, I have no belief in the Bible or Jesus other than there are neat moral lessons to be learned from them. But the point is that for Sam to say he is Christian, and he loves profit ("an abomination") AND for him to say he disapproves of volunteering (something the Jesus said was good) he is, like you, like Sham, like Sean, which is to say he is, by definition, a BAD CHRISTIAN. Res ipsa loquitor.
Hey Carl,
"Sean, you are quickly lumping yourself into the same category as Chunk and Duff, which is to say your posts are the blog equivalent of pornography that has been edited for prime time television. Since I know subleties like metaphor and simile are out of your league I will it out for ya...your posts have absolutely no content worth subjecting myself to read.
Having said that, I should note that I do derive a strange joy from reading the senseless, pointless, and devoid of any independent thought blatherings that you and your cronies spew. It pleases me greatly to know that, despite Sam's affirmations, ignorance like yours is just the death rattle of a thankfully endangered beast. May God have mercy on your spiteful souls.
God bless America"
-- Posted by Carl Leibowitz on Tue, Dec 1, 2009, at 7:51 PM
and;
"Sean, you are quickly lumping yourself into the same category as Chunk and Duff, which is to say your posts are the blog equivalent of pornography that has been edited for prime time television. Since I know subleties like metaphor and simile are out of your league I will it out for ya...your posts have absolutely no content worth subjecting myself to read.
Having said that, I should note that I do derive a strange joy from reading the senseless, pointless, and devoid of any independent thought blatherings that you and your cronies spew. It pleases me greatly to know that, despite Sam's affirmations, ignorance like yours is just the death rattle of a thankfully endangered beast. May God have mercy on your spiteful souls.
God bless America"
-- Posted by Carl Leibowitz on Thu, Dec 3, 2009, at 5:58 PM
Have you run out fresh ideas? Carl?
Naw, Chunk, I have plenty of ideas but just found reiteration to apropos. Since I know you don't know what those big words mean I'll gladly translate it for ya...I felt that repeating myself was appropriate.
God bless America
Well, Sean the first problem with your scenario is that Conservative women get just as many abortions as anyone else. In fact, there is some data that says because of the tendency for young Christian women to have premarital sex, and the conflicting dogmatic requirement that young Christian men and women cannot use contraceptives, this is leading to disproportionate numbers of unwanted pregnancy rates among those affiliated with Christianity. This is in turn raising abortion rates among this demographic as well.
The other problem with your scenario is that abortion cannot be genocide. One woman aborting one fetus is not deliberately and systematically destroying, in whole or in part, an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group--which is of course the definition of genocide.
Sean does have a small mind, but through no fault of his own. Developmental psychologists like Koffman, Marcia, and Gibbs have mountains of empirical data to identify people like Sean who have strong commitments to belief structures that were instilled by his parents, or agents of his specific culture that clearly were not actively choosen. Sean, like most Conservatives, is not a rational agent, he has been handed his ideology by his parents, pastors, friends, rehab councelors, uncles, aunts, etc.
People like Sean are not uncommon, many religously affiliated people throughout the world experience this disconnect from agency. That is why an education system that instills critical thinking abilities, especially the sort found in higher eduaction, that challenge young people to question their social order, and allow them to independently construct their own identites rationally, is so important.
The US public education system failed Sean, but there are plenty of folks out there trying hard to reform the broken system. I am a stalwart. There will be fewer Seans than more on my watch, I can guaruntee that.
Hey Sean - just so you know, you're appreciated. It is difficult to understand the mindset of a leftist, but then, pure hate is difficult to understand.
Right Sam good point...afterall sean writes things like:
-You should be imprisoned! Go back to spain! Communist demon.
-I hate him sooo much I just want to smash up my computer screen!
-Fredd wants to slaughter Indian children!
-Guillermo is a nazi spanish pig rapist
-an immigrant from a country like spain that will never respect our God (by the way Sapin is 95% Christian)
-canine sucklefish
-dill hole
I suppose you also appreciate Sean's genocide in the name of God. You see, THIS is the type of person Sham appreciates. He LOVES people like this: xenophobic bottom feeding scumbags whose only station in life is to hate all things not white, not Christian, not midwestern, not Conservative. Shame on you Sam, you have proven to all that you are truly the wporst kind of person there alive.
Would we be better Christians if we just kept out of your way?? Didn't have passion about the issues that you spew??
Perhaps we should be wearing robes and sandals, being more passive, and just allow you and your left wing cronies to spread the liberal gospel without fear of accountability.
What a relief you must feel not to have that "burden" of Christianity to hold yourself accountable for, yet have that tool in your arsenal to use anytime you become cornered.
The arrogance it must take to be you..."I'm not Christian, but YOU'RE acting like a bad one". Kind of like a terrorist complaining about inappropriate pictures, while beheading a civilian on the internet. We have rules to play by while you don't, huh? If only the rest of us could be more like you, without a belief in God...and if we do, then our Faith should dictate that we measure our words when debating the great gi.
I'm not that kind of Christian gi...don't misinterpret me again. If arguing with you (using your own words against you - e.g. fetus vs tumor) makes me "Un-Christian", then I guess I'm Un-Christian. Like you always claim, gi - I'm in this until the end...I will call you on your bullying, arrogance, and lies until this gets settled or you go away. Let the "Un-Christianity" begin tumor boy.
Husker with every word you write you betray your believe system even further; you undermine your "alleged" connection to the "Christian God." I have never misinterpreted you, your policy of not sticking to Christian values speak for itself.
It is a great relief to not be burdened by Christianity. I spent a good portion of my childhood in a country that is 94% Catholic. Organized religion is a terrible albatross around the necks of its patrons.
America's "Christians" are no different. It is a stifling and oppressive organization of zombies that are herded around by charlatans and child molesters in disgusting robes and costumes. They lust after power and sin, and corral you into opulent buildings adorned with lavish stained glass masterpieces and enormous pipe organs. The Jesus that I admire and respect would admonish what people like you, Husker, have done to his teachings...that is made them a pure bastardization of every single tenet he preached until now all that is left is your black and evil hatred.
Sean, close your eyes for a moment, and let these thought roll through your mind...
Think of all the gay people and the progress they keep making in attaining civil rights, think of all the illegal immigrants that nobody is really doing anything about, think about the increasing number of other ethnicities and the decreasing numbers of white people in America, think of abortions, think of the inevitable overhaul of health care, the publicization of private industries like banks and car manufacturers, think of the green energy movement and the increasing number of Americans attending liberal colleges, think of increased regulations on business, and the rich being fleeced by the government.
Think of all these things happening around you right now and ask yourself, "Do I really want to be in America?"
Sean,
It is educational to see what happened when you used the same tactics against the liberals that they enjoy as their daily bread.
Fredds' idiotic assertion that Christ was a liberal shows the true deprivation of liberal thought.
Fredd, let us talk about God's will for a minute. It is God's will for American women to kill off over fifty million of their own children?
I will give you no credit for bringing up Sand Creek. You had to go back to November of 1864 to find a nutcase like Chivington, who was an ordained minister, to claim that the United States slaughtered 22 million Indians.
Your 22 million figure is completely bogus, but even if it was correct, you have supported the murder of more than twice that amount since Roe v. Wade. Can you say hypocrite?
There are some that believe that our lives, and what happens to us in our lives, has already been "pre-ordained". If you believe that, then you must conclude that whatever happens to an individual, good or bad, was God's will.
Of course, I don't believe that you can put the Creator of all things into a box. It was not God's will that any innocent child be murdered, whether they be native Indian or not. However, God has granted us free will on Earth, and humans, being the imperfect creatures that we are, will make mistakes.
In your zeal to slander America, you forgot that not everyone who was with the crazy Chivington agreed with his hideous actions.
Did you forget about Captain Silas Soule? Or did your Marxist professor fail to school you properly? It was Captain Soule who said, "I refused to fire and swore that none but a coward would, for by this time, hundreds of women and children were coming towards us begging for mercy..."
Captain Soule was later murdered on the streets of Denver for standing against the cowardly acts committed by Chivington and the others. Not surprising that in your hate, you would conveniently forget that small fact.
To take the massacre of 165 souls, and turn that into 22 million is silly, and blatantly untrue.
Maybe you should request a refund on any money that you spent on education.
My mom is native Indian, and if anyone should have a bone to pick, it would be her and not you. You seek any chance, any excuse to profligate hate, and show yourself to be a fool in doing so.
What I am curious about is your sins bro! You are so good at pointing out Rush's mistakes, or O'Reilly's or Becks, what about you fredd? Are you perfect?
Since none are perfect, except for Christ, then can no one ever speak, or act or believe? Did you support Bill Clinton, I suspect you did. So his sins are okay because he was a liberal?
If we listened to the insanity that you put forth, only liberals can act after their sin is discovered. That is ridiculous, as you are.
No sane person ever claimed that the United States is perfect, or has always been perfect. What is perfect is truth. What is perfect is liberty, what is perfect is respect for life. WE, being imperfect, can therefore cling to what is perfect. Is this just too much for your little brain to comprehend.
I have given you much more time than your deserve, but your arguments are so crude, so incendiary, that I had to speak out.
Next time, try a better argument, will you? You are beginning to bore me.
Clint Eastwood said in the movie, Heartbreak Ridge, "You can beat me, you can hit me, you can kick me, and even kill me, just don't bore me."
I'd have to say, the only pure hatred on these blogs comes from fredd.
Upon further review, fredd and Guillermo are the same person.
I don't know Sean, both are gifted name callers, yet both are polar opposites. One seems slovenly and unmotivated. The other is an over-educated, under-employed, intellectual snob. One hasn't found the "shift" key, yet at times can actually form a complete thought. The other, who constantly sources everything, at times cannot form an original thought.
Just makes me wonder.
fredd/Guillermo,
I believe the title of this blog was "Some Words of Wisdom". My how this degraded.
Chunk/Dufferxyz,
You were, and continue to be, an integral part of that degradation. Congrats.
of all the arguments I have seen that accuse liberals of being anti American...let it be me, a liberal, on the anniversary of the day that will live in infamy, to be the first to honor the fallen...
God bless America
By the way, Thank you Carl
May God Bless you.