Donald J. Trump is Dangerous for America

Posted Sunday, July 3, 2016, at 9:29 PM
Comments
View 39 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • As I See It:

    The Vote will go to the one God would Hallow,

    To Save America, or be a Land, laying Fallow,

    Considering the Blindness of Liberal Eye,

    Hillary might win, and, America, probably Die.

    She'll take all the 'Guns,' to allow 'Sharia Law,'

    As Obama's Agenda, give all, to children of Esau,

    So, do what you can, to venerate, Hillary Clinton,

    That, Constitution, and Freedom, be 'Totally Smitten.'

    AMEN

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Tue, Jul 5, 2016, at 12:52 PM
  • *

    You chastising anyone for allegedly having an 8th grade mentality is rich.....just rich.

    -- Posted by divorcedugly on Tue, Jul 5, 2016, at 3:32 PM
  • I almost didn't respond, then thought, why not. Of all the leftist tripe posted by Michael, this has to be at the top of the "asinine list". You don't care for Trump, that's fine. There are millions of us who feel the same way about your "queen" of treachery. The Clintons stole from the White House once, and you want to give them another chance? All you folks who think Killery is not lower than a snakes belly in a wagon rut, have a severecase of H.U.A!

    -- Posted by Manuel on Tue, Jul 5, 2016, at 3:33 PM
  • Science lesson for the day, Michael.

    The Earth revolves around the sun. Contrary to your opinion that it revolves around you and your opinion.

    You are welcome.

    Have a nice day!

    -- Posted by allstar69 on Tue, Jul 5, 2016, at 6:03 PM
  • *

    Navy, didn't you already predict that Obama was going to take our guns, and that American would die under his sharia law?

    Still waiting for that to happen, there isn't much time left for him to do what you have predicted for years.

    The last time we had a president that pronounced that God had ordained he be president was George Bush. Two bad wars and thousands left dead and the economy collapsed I don't think that is the best course of action.

    I seriously doubt just from listening to him that Trump has ever opened a Bible let alone is a Christian.

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Tue, Jul 5, 2016, at 9:48 PM
  • *

    You know, Manny, for all your (you, the radical right, and conspiracy theorist) sniping that Clinton has broken laws or actually killed anyone (Killery, cute) you never actually offer up any proof.

    You know why? There is no proof. For 24 years you and your ilk have repeatedly tried to get the Clintons arrested (even thrown out of office) the only things you have to show for it is the most popular modern ex-president (who actually gained popularity after your failed attempt to kick him out) and higher popularity for your wife.

    It should shame you that nothing you and your ilk has done has even dented Hillary. The fact that in less than a year Bernie Sanders was able to dent her popularity more than you could in 26 years is just embarrassing.

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Tue, Jul 5, 2016, at 9:53 PM
  • KoolAid drinking sycophants..What was it that Lenin called them? "Useful idiots!"

    Go back to your couch and watch TV, Michael!

    -- Posted by allstar69 on Wed, Jul 6, 2016, at 8:22 AM
  • And I notice that you conveniently did not address the fact that Clintons stole from the White House. Of course, they made restitution out of the "kindness of their hearts". And I also notice that you conveniently left out the fact that most Dems supported Bush's decision to go to war. They must have "lied" right along with Bush.

    Anyone who admires HRC must have slithered out of the same cesspool that she did.

    -- Posted by Manuel on Wed, Jul 6, 2016, at 9:22 AM
  • Manny, the real problem is that they seem to love their cesspool, and want to force the rest of us into the pool also! Useful Idiots, indeed!

    -- Posted by allstar69 on Wed, Jul 6, 2016, at 7:00 PM
  • I continue to wonder why these useful idiots continue to call themselves "progressives" when they are really regressives, trying to drag this country and everyone in it down into the same crapholes as the third world countries their beloved muzzies came from?

    Michael, why don't you go back to writing about college football and the moronic unreality tv shows you seem to actually know something about? Or not?

    Or better yet, why don't you just go away?

    -- Posted by allstar69 on Wed, Jul 6, 2016, at 10:21 PM
  • *

    I won't go away allstar because then you wouldn't have anything to grip about.

    Wow I must have touched a nerve with you. I asked you for one simple proof of Hillary law breaking and you change the subject. It's to be expected. When pressed for facts your ilk either bring up conspiracy theories hoping that no one will actually check them out or change the subject.

    It's odd that you bring up the Iraqi War because you should know that I was against the war from the beginning. I can post the blogs if you want.

    Also, what I find very interesting is that I absolutely trashed Donald Trump the torch bearer for the Republican Party and not a single person defended him, yet every single on of you will vote for him. Talk about drinking the Kool-Aid. I know the faults of Clinton. I have talked about them. Hell I voted for Bernie Sanders. However, she is the torch bearer for my party and despite her faults she is more prepared to be president than any other candidate in modern history. Despite her faults I have no problem supporting her and will defend he against untrue allegations.

    I give you all a great chance to defend Trump and I get crickets. Amazing.

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Thu, Jul 7, 2016, at 4:37 PM
  • Michael--Believe most of the citizens of southwest Nebraska drank the hate Kool Aid years ago and drink it often in their day to day lives. Sad, they could not recognize the truth if Jesus Christ came back and told them face to face.

    -- Posted by ontheleftcoast on Thu, Jul 7, 2016, at 6:46 PM
  • I believe the FBI Director confirmed that Clinton lied to Congress. Not sure what authority congress has. Rafael Palmeiro lied to congress and I don't think they punished him.

    -- Posted by wallismarsh on Thu, Jul 7, 2016, at 7:42 PM
  • And once again you avoid mentioning that the Cintons STOLE from the White House. Of course, restitution absolves them of blame for theft? You thief admirers simply amaze me. I don't expect to change your mind as I'm sure you don't expect to change mine.

    -- Posted by Manuel on Thu, Jul 7, 2016, at 8:44 PM
  • *

    Manny try to stay up. I asked for proof of Hillary Clinton breaking the law. You come back with the same response as allstar that the Clinton stole from the White House.

    That's not proof, that's a statement. If you make a statement but don't follow it up with any proof to back up to your statement, it's not proof, it's still just a statement.

    I don't think my request could be any easier. Show me proof. I'm not trying to change your mind I'm simply asking for proof that Hillary Clinton broke the law.

    Are you able to do that?

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Thu, Jul 7, 2016, at 9:04 PM
  • *

    By the way I'm also waiting on that defense of Trump.

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Thu, Jul 7, 2016, at 9:05 PM
  • Michael, you are becoming delirious! What did I say about the Iraq war? For that matter, what did I say about the theiving Clintons stealing stuff from the White House? You have worked yourself into such a lather that you can't even seem to keep track of who is challenging you about what! And we should consider your opinion about anything?

    Go back to football and unreality tv shows, Micheal. Something you really understand! Bashing heads and BS made up situational made-for-morons tv garbage.

    Have a nice day!!

    -- Posted by allstar69 on Thu, Jul 7, 2016, at 9:51 PM
  • Michael, you are becoming delirious! What did I say about the Iraq war? For that matter, what did I say about the theiving Clintons stealing stuff from the White House? You have worked yourself into such a lather that you can't even seem to keep track of who is challenging you about what! And we should consider your opinion about anything?

    Go back to football and unreality tv shows, Micheal. Something you really understand! Bashing heads and BS made up situational made-for-morons tv garbage.

    You see, Michael, I really don't hate the Clintons, or Bernie, or Osama bin Lying. I just really dislike you! Because you represent everything I dislike about "progressives" and socialists, who want to drag our country into the third-world cesspool of slime and filth!

    Have a nice day!!

    -- Posted by allstar69 on Thu, Jul 7, 2016, at 9:55 PM
  • A link for your perusal (to read): abcnews.go.com/politics/story Clintons return furniture to White House.

    I'm not defending Trump; it's not that I think he will do the best job, it's that I think he will do a much better job than your lying, cheating, thief.

    -- Posted by Manuel on Thu, Jul 7, 2016, at 9:59 PM
  • I am really curious about something! Who is it at the Gazette that thinks that the tripe that this guy writes is useful? And, who allows it to continue?

    Just wondering?

    -- Posted by allstar69 on Thu, Jul 7, 2016, at 10:09 PM
  • *

    Yeah, sorry Manny but that story doesn't exist on ABC's webpage. Maybe if you put the actual link in instead of a made up one.

    "I'm not defending Trump; it's not that I think he will do the best job, it's that I think he will do a much better job than your lying, cheating, thief."

    That has to be one of the saddest endorsements of a presidential candidate I have ever read.

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Fri, Jul 8, 2016, at 8:59 AM
  • *

    You are a sad little person allstar? Next thing we know you're going to start going to all my blogs trashing me because you apparently, literally, have nothing better to do. Oh, wait - never mind.

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Fri, Jul 8, 2016, at 9:00 AM
  • Michael, if you weren't fearful of finding the story, go to: abcnews.com Then type in (the same browser): Clintons stole from White House. There are dozens of entries, both pro and con. Draw your own conclusions. I'm sure I could, with reasonable accuracy, predict your conclusions.

    Sad endorsement? Could be, but I'm not endorsing someone who is currently under investigation by the F.B.I.

    -- Posted by Manuel on Fri, Jul 8, 2016, at 9:27 AM
  • *

    Has anyone every noticed that the ones yelling the loudest about "waking up" and "think for yourselves" are the ones that will seemingly believe any conspiracy theory out there?

    The group above, specifically allstar and Manny are perfect examples. They are convinced of Hillary Clinton's evilness as it has been pounded into their heads for over 20 years.

    So it is no surprise that when asked for proof of lawbreaking they have nothing but sad little insults.

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Fri, Jul 8, 2016, at 9:55 AM
  • *

    Manny, I asked you for proof and now you're telling me that I have to do it for you?

    Why is this so hard for you?

    What you want me to do is read articles and draw my own conclusion? That's not how this works. You saw that Clinton is a lawbreaker and thief. I ask you to prove your claim. If you are able to then you do. That's how it's supposed to work.

    Instead what we get is you say that the Clintons are lawbreakers and thieves. I ask you to prove it. You come back with they are they stole from the White House but returned it. I ask you again to prove your claim. You provide a link that isn't actually a link. I inform you of this and again ask you to prove your claim. You then tell me that I have to do my own research on your claim and to read articles and then come to my own conclusion. That is not how proving your claim works.

    Can you prove your claim or are you just blowing smoke.

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Fri, Jul 8, 2016, at 9:59 AM
  • *

    I'm not endorsing someone who is currently under investigation by the F.B.I.

    -- Posted by Manuel on Fri, Jul 8, 2016, at 9:27 AM

    I'm not really sure what this in reference to because there isn't a candidate for president under investigation by the FBI. The FBI closed their investigation on Clinton.

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Fri, Jul 8, 2016, at 10:01 AM
  • Apparently your cocoon is self sealing, keeping out news. Apparentlly you have not heard, or choose not to see, that the Clinton email investigation has been re-opened. Speaking of typical Michael, I believe you are a perfect example.

    -- Posted by Manuel on Fri, Jul 8, 2016, at 10:32 AM
  • *

    Aw poor Manny. You chastise me for not keeping up with the news when you yourself are the one not paying attention.

    Congressional Republicans bullied the Justice Department to re-open the investigation (once again wasting millions of taxpayers dollars, but apparently that's okay).

    The FBI concluded their investigation and closed the case. Congressional Republicans are trying to bully the FBI to re-open their investigation.

    The two investigations are completely different. Just as in the first case. Both the Justice Department and FBI investigated. When the FBI closed their investigation, the Justice Department saw no need to continue their investigation.

    Please learn how government works before posting next time. You just look foolish with these easy mistakes

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 2:09 PM
  • *

    By the way Manny I'm still waiting on your proof of lawlessness and thievery of the Clintons.

    This is the problem with people like you. You like to throw blanket accusations but when you are asked to prove your accusations you demand that other people do it for you and you try to change the topic.

    It seems so simple to me. Prove your accusation or admit that it is just simply hate for the Clintons.

    If it's solely for hate I can at least respect that but continuing to duck and jive away from proving your accusations is just plain pitiful.

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 2:12 PM
  • *

    What's really going to be funny is if this whole Donald Trump run was just his way of ensuring that Hillary Clinton becomes president making all you look like fools.

    I don't think this is actually the case but it would be hilarious.

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 2:14 PM
  • I provided info to illustrate my points. If you choose to ignore them that is your privilege. You are a fine one to point out others lack of desire to "check further". You voted for Bernie Sanders? Bwahahaha Tells me you are looking for a free ride on the coattails of others' efforts.

    -- Posted by Manuel on Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 3:27 PM
  • Please, folks, a little respect for Michael. He is entitled to his opinion (see instructions).

    A nation's political life is like a Shakespearian play written hundreds of years ago. The actors change but the play remains the same.

    The powerful in each party make sure the only people on the ballot are normally people they control. Not sure Trump fits the bill for them, and thus, the constant attacks by the media and the Republican party against him. If the nomination were stolen from him at the convention, or he was the victim of an accident, it would not be surprising.

    It is a false dichotomy.

    Respectfully submitted,

    -- Posted by JohnGalt1968 on Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 4:35 PM
  • *

    The media have by and far let Trump do and say anything he wanted until a month ago. Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC routinely let him phone interviews in while the other candidates were asked to appear.

    Reporting on the garbage spewing from Trump's mouth is not the media attacking him, it's the media actually doing their job and holding him accountable for what he says. Unfortunately he likes to lie about what he has said and done so it can be difficult to hold a compulsive liar accountable.

    What false dichotomy are you talking about?

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 8:15 PM
  • *

    I provided info to illustrate my points. If you choose to ignore them that is your privilege. You are a fine one to point out others lack of desire to "check further". You voted for Bernie Sanders? Bwahahaha Tells me you are looking for a free ride on the coattails of others' efforts.

    -- Posted by Manuel on Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 3:27 PM

    You are either a horrible liar or you think you did something you didn't do. The one example you provided (the Clintons stealing furniture from the White House) you provided a like that didn't work and then demanded that I do my own research and come to my own conclusion. That's not how proving your point works.

    I will continue to make the request, provide proof that Hillary Clinton has violated the law.

    You equate voting for Bernie Sanders to looking for a free ride on the coattails of others' efforts. This statement tells me everything I need to know about you Manny. You let others do your thinking for you. You don't have any idea of what Bernie Sanders actually said, what any of his positions were, but you heard someone make that statement so you have adopted it as your own.

    Bernie Sanders is a Democratic Socialist. He calls back to the economic pinnacle of this country (40s through the early 70s) where the government was run in the Democratic Socialist manner. Taxes were highest on the rich but everyone paid their share. During this time the interstate system was built, we went to space, we landed on the moon all paid for by taxes.

    Buy yeah you go ahead and live in your little fantasy land where trickle down economics actually works and Hillary Clinton is a murdering law breaker.

    -- Posted by MichaelHendricks on Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 8:50 PM
  • Michael, one of these days, you might actually grow up and realize that there are lots of folks out there that disagree with you! You can call them all the names you want, but you have no right to do so, rather than your own arrogance telling you it is ok! Maybe you should get back on your couch, surround yourself with your dogs, and chill out? As for growing up, most of us think that will be a lost cause!

    Have a really nice day, as I can't think of anybody who deserves one less than you do!

    -- Posted by allstar69 on Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 9:54 PM
  • Michael, I will continue to read your blog but you may not hear from me again. I am trying to get some inkling of the liberal mind-set but have come to the conclusion that may be impossible. I also wanted to have a reasonable disagreement on opinion with you but have come to the conclusion that may also be impossible.

    -- Posted by Manuel on Tue, Jul 12, 2016, at 6:52 PM
  • False dichotomy:

    That there is a real difference between the candidates nominated by the two parties.

    President Obama railed against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the prisoners at Guantanimo, and most policies of President Bush. Yet, we see him send more troops to Iraq (when he promised to have us out very quickly if elected). We doubled down with interventions in Egypt, Iran and Syria. Guantanimo has not been closed as he promised. (Hint: there is lots of money to be made in wars and the campaign funds coming from the military-industrial complex are a huge benefit to those in politics).

    The size and spending of the government both increase every year, no matter who gets elected. That much is obvious. Take an unbiased look and you will see no difference, no matter who you vote for. Oh, they talk differently, but ye shall know them by their works.

    Michael, you refer to others having a fantasy, while it seems you enjoy your own, as well.

    I care deeply about my country, and I served in the US Army when I was young. But I do not care who gets elected, since it does NOT matter.

    I can do far more productive things attending to the things I CAN control in my own life, in my own way.

    -- Posted by JohnGalt1968 on Tue, Jul 12, 2016, at 7:58 PM
  • Michael, in anticipation of your denial of the false dichotomy, I post one last time.

    While you are overwrought by Trump's candidacy, and others here are mad at you and Hillary, the powers that be (the 1%ers) are getting rich off both sides. The one percenters got their riches in many cases by lurking behind the scenes, getting rich from funding both campaigns--they win either way.

    It's like going to the roulette wheel at the casino. Some of you bet on red, some of you bet on blue. But you all lose to the house. Every time. Still you persist in believing that blue or red are the best.

    Fantasy.

    -- Posted by JohnGalt1968 on Tue, Jul 12, 2016, at 8:04 PM
  • i am in Chicago and just happened to be staying across the street from the Trump International. Trump had a fund raiser yesterday and my son and I went over to check out the protestors.

    You can see my photo's on my twitter account.

    Raiseanative_99

    Wallis Marsh

    -- Posted by wallismarsh on Wed, Jul 13, 2016, at 9:12 AM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: